首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
40
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
"British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. " It implies that______.
选项
A、the British legal system can do the basic job well—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、the British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
这是一道推断题,句意为“英国审判制度与其说是严肃执法,倒不如说是一场游戏。”其言外之意就是“英国法律制度并不公正。”于是,正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vYxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStates,olderpeoplerarelylivewiththeftadultchildren,Butinmanyothercultureschildrenareexpectedtoca
Wesometimesthinkhumansareuniquelyvulnerabletoanxiety,butstressseemstoaffecttheimmunedefensesofloweranimalsto
Whatisanimportantgoalforsomedevelopingcountries?
Atatimewheneveryone’smindistheexplosionsofthemoment,itmightseemobtuseofmetodiscussthefourteenthcentury.Bu
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
Somepeoplebelievethatinternationalsportcreatesgoodwillbetweenthenationsandthatifcountriesplaygamestogetherthey
Jewish从给出的信息(GermanyofJewishnationality)可以判断答案是Jewish,此外,文中说1938年他到了美国,所以可以猜测他不是美国人,这个信息可以辅助我们确定正确答案。注意民族、国籍等需要用形容词形式。
Whatmustyoumakesurewhenyouloadthecassette?
Whatmustyoumakesurewhenyouloadthecassette?
随机试题
女,59岁。右下腹隐痛,伴腹胀、腹泻3个月余,诊为右侧结肠癌。手术探查发现:距回盲瓣5cm处升结肠腔内一3cm×4cm质硬肿块,呈结节状,累及浆膜层,未见壁腹膜受累和腹腔内淋巴结转移灶,行右侧结肠根治术,术后病理证实为腺癌,癌肿穿透肠壁,切除相应系膜内淋巴
室内某点的采光系数取2%,当室外照度为15000lx时,室内照度是()。
【真题(初级)】下列各项中,属于经营预算的有()。
( )是指在债券质押式回购交易中融出资金、享有债券质权的一方。
(2010年)下列行为中,属于税收执法监督中事后监督形式的有()。
某集团公司总经理张先生2003年各项收入情况如下:(1)每月工资5000元,12月分得全年效益工资90000元(该集团公司对管理层实行年薪制);(2)与某大学王教授合著一本专业著作,取得稿酬收入20000元,其中:张总分得稿酬12000元,并拿出300
饭后参加剧烈运动前,一般应休息()。
试结合某一文艺流派的产生、发展,分析艺术发展中继承与创新的关系。
在一项问卷调查中,有一个题目的选项X和选项Y的被选率都是35%。研究者在分析研究结果时,把符合其意向的选项X表述为“高达35%”,而把不符合其意向的选项Y表述为“仅占35%”。这种做法违背了教育研究的()
下列哪种情形不属于间接故意?()
最新回复
(
0
)