首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
39
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word
heritage
in Paragraph 8 is closest in meaning to______.
选项
A、legacy
B、hero
C、proof
D、heir
答案
A
解析
本题仍为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词heritage的理解。结合第32题的解析,heritage所在句子“We want to bring it into the light,to have it as part of our preciousartistic heritage”的意思是“我们想将所有美好的东西展示给世人,将它们作为我们珍贵艺术遗产的一部分”。所以答案应为选项A(遗产)。而选项B(英雄)、C(证据)和D(继承人)均不合适。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vhfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completetheexplanationoftheroomnumber.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.INSURANCE
Completethetablebelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
Acardinalrolefor(players)ofthelute,(astringed)instrument,(are)thateverynoteissustainedfor(aslongas)possible
A、Shewasafamousauthor.B、Herfamilylaterbecamefamouslandowners.C、Sheexemplifiestheimmigrantspirit.D、Sheinventeds
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?TherearemanylegendsabouttheworldfamousEgyptianPharaohs’tombs,whichhavelainsilentf
"PhysicsClass"Accordingtothediscussion,whatreasondoesthemangiveforrejectingstringtheory?
随机试题
A、辐射B、传导C、对流D、蒸发E、辐射+对流用酒精擦浴为高热病人降温所运用的散热方式是
女性,45岁,唇部黏膜肿胀破溃3个月余。口腔检查:下唇左侧可见一个直径1cm的浅表、微凹溃疡,基底有少许渗出物,渗出物下可见桑葚样肉芽肿,溃疡边缘清楚,微隆,呈鼠噬状。根据诊断:强化治疗阶段采用的标准化疗联合用药方案是()
某企业2012年3月31日的银行存款日记账账面余额为385200元,银行对账单上存款余额为357500元。经逐笔核对,发现有以下未达账项及相关错误:(1)3月26日,企业开出转账支票29000元支付前欠货款,持票人尚未到银行办理转账。(2)3月27日,
采用赊销、分期付款结算方式的,增值税专用发票的开具时限为( )。
根据我国土地增值税暂行条例实施细则的规定,土地增值税的计税依据是()。
(2011年卷一第43题)下列关于创造性的说法哪些是正确的?
《导游人员管理条例》规定:取得导游资格证,()不可以申请导游证。
(2017·山东)三结合教育一般是指()(常考)
设f(x)二阶连续可导,f’(0)=0,且=一1,则().
WhenPaulGorski,thefounderofanorganizationcalledEdChange,visitscollegesanduniversitiestoadvisethemoncampusdiv
最新回复
(
0
)