首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
公务员
You can not go forward by going backward.Take the current debate about trade and globalization,for instance,while the impulse to
You can not go forward by going backward.Take the current debate about trade and globalization,for instance,while the impulse to
admin
2019-11-28
87
问题
You can not go forward by going backward.Take the current debate about trade and globalization,for instance,while the impulse to erect trade barriers is understandable given the pain experienced in recent years,it is not the way to create lasting growth and shared prosperity.
Over the past three decades,global flows of trade and investment have accelerated dramatically,creating enormous economic value.However,trade and globalization have also brought wrenching job losses.The financial crisis and weak recovery have made matters worse,intensifying the backlash against trade and globalization.
Part of the problem is that the benefits of trade and investment go largely unrecognized,while the job losses are often overstated.Another significant problem is that participation in trade and investment is limited to a relatively small set of firms.In the U.S.,large firms account for three-quarters of total exports,and the vast majority of small and medium-size businesses do not export.This means firms have a great opportunity to boost growth and productivity through wider participation in trade.
That leaves the question of how to help those hurt by trade and globalization.Too often we talk about re—training as a panacea(万能药).And yes,it helps.But it needs to take into account the different requirements of each workforce and needs to be part of a wider set of support for affected workers and communities.
Above all,it is important to recognize that our economic transition to a global and digital economy is an irreversible trend.Only by broadening participation in the global economy,ratherthan by trying to turn back the clock,will we discover answers to today’s most vexing economic problems.
请回答下列问题。
What does the author think of re-training as a solution?
选项
A、It iS a one-size-fit-all solution.
B、It is not helpful to those hurt by trade and globalization.
C、It should meet the different needs of affected workforee.
D、It should not be talked about SO often.
答案
C
解析
细节题。通过题干关键词re-training可定位到原文第四段。从原文“But it needs to take into account the different requirements of each workforce and needs to be part of …”可知,再培训需要考虑到每种劳动力的不同需求,故C项为正确答案。A项属于过度推断,原文讲的是“Too often we talk about re-training as a panacea”“我们经常说再培训是万能药”,但并不等于它就是万能药,故错误。B项“对被贸易和全球化伤害的人没有帮助”与原文相反,原文讲的是“And yes,it helps.”“是的,它有帮助”,故错误。D项“它不应该经常被谈论”原文没有提及,原文只是提到“我们经常谈论”而没有讲“我们应不应该谈论”的问题,故错误。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vzjY777K
本试题收录于:
银保监财会类题库国家公务员分类
0
银保监财会类
国家公务员
相关试题推荐
(1)某领域发生系统性风险(2)合理的财政结构(3)建立多元经济结构(4)财政收入过度集中于某领域(5)财政危机()
某县为了改善办学条件,计划集中采购一批投影仪和教室音响。已知购买2套教室音响比购买3台投影仪多4000元,购买4套教室音响和3台投影仪共需要71000元。则1套教室音响比1台投影仪贵:()
所谓产业和就业之间矛盾在几乎所有情形下都是虚拟的,虽然生产力提高可能减少特定产业中的就业(有时不尽如此),但它并不会永久地造成经济中工作机会减少的那种失业,它使就业地点从一个产业转向另一个产业。由此可以推出正确的结论是:()
如何区分科学与伪科学?一个残酷的现实就是两者之间的界限有时是模糊的。在发展迅速的生命科学、人工智能等领域,今天的发现很可能就会颠覆昨天的定论。更让人头痛的是,当科学知识被撕裂、混杂再拼到一起时,哪怕是专业人士也很难即刻辨析真伪,更不用说被专业术语一下子搞晕
下列关于吉林省历史沿革的表述。错误的是:()
2018年4月4日,由美国、韩国和中国三国研究人员组成的一个国际研究团队在华盛顿开发出一款不用电池、可无线传输数据的新型传感器系统,可用于监测患者生理数据。下列关于该设备的说法,错误的是:()
气象服务经济包含两层意义,一是指利用气象服务来防灾、抗灾以避免风险和损失;二是指利用有利的气象条件来创造效益。人们可以利用气象信息作为从事经济活动的决策依据之一,可以根据气象服务提供的信息,安排生产经营活动,减少经济损失,提高经济效益。根据上述定义,下列属
非经常性损益是指与公司正常经营业务无直接关系,以及虽与正常经营业务相关,但由于其性质特殊和偶发性,影响报表使用人对公司经营业绩和营利能力做出正常判断的各项交易和事项产生的损益。根据上述定义,下列描述属于非经常性损益的是:
Youcannotgoforwardbygoingbackward.Takethecurrentdebateabouttradeandglobalization,forinstance,whiletheimpulseto
Youcannotgoforwardbygoingbackward.Takethecurrentdebateabouttradeandglobalization,forinstance,whiletheimpulseto
随机试题
排卵前卵泡液中显著增加,于排卵时达高峰,有助于排卵的是
郭某涉嫌参加恐怖组织罪被逮捕,随后委托律师姜某担任辩护人。关于姜某履行辩护职责,下列哪一选项是正确的?(2016年卷二26题)
资质认定部门应当自受理申请之日起45个工作日内,依据检验检测机构资质认定基本规范、评审准则的要求,完成对申请人的现场评审并发证。()
我国目前的旅馆客房内最常见的空调系统是()。
采用单价法和实物法编制施工图预算的主要区别是()。
减肥的最佳方法是运动、节食双管齐下。()
下列诸债属于法定之债的是()。
试述传统媒体和新媒体在相互影响新形势下各自的发展方略。(南京大学,2009年)
下列关于用益物权的说法错误的是()
数据模型质量的高低不会影响数据库性能的好坏,这句话正确否?【】
最新回复
(
0
)