首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
admin
2013-10-17
71
问题
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most
All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re also the only way to pick a school. I’ve heard those exact words dozens of times and inferred their sentiment hundreds more. They undoubtedly were a major contributing factor in the 250,000 applications to the top colleges this past year. With only 14, 000 chances available, there will be a lot of disappointed families when decisions are announced in a few days. For 30 years, I’ve co-authored bestselling books and provocative articles about how to improve one’s chances of being accepted at a "top" college.
The first edition of our book Getting In ! revealed what went on behind the admission committees’ closed doors, and introduced the concepts of packaging and positioning to the college-application vocabulary. The newest edition adapts the same principles to the digital age. But the core message remains: good colleges are not looking for the well-rounded kid—they’re looking to put together the well-rounded class.
What were revelations in 1983 are common knowledge today—at least among college-bound students, parents, and counselors. They also don’t have to be told that the odds of getting into a "highly selective" school are ridiculously low. Brown and Dartmouth will each accept about 9 percent of applicants; Cornell, Northwestern, and Georgetown about 16 percent. And Harvard, Yale, and Stanford? Forget about it: less than 7 percent!
Wanting to attend a "name" school isn’t illogical. And there is nothing illogical in parents wanting a better return on their investment. A college’s brand value—whether that school’s name will be recognized and open employers’ door.
Colleges, counselors, and parents talk a lot about finding the right "fit" between a school and a student. In reality, the process is dominated by reputation.
The problem is that college reputations have been controlled by rankings. Far too many " highly ranked" colleges are gaming the rankings and trying to attract more and more applicants—when the particular college is actually a poor "fit" for many of the kids applying. Colleges want to attract and reject more kids because that "selectivity" improves the institution’s ranking.
College presidents publicly complain there are too many college rankings. Privately, they admit they have to provide the data that feed that maw(大胃口). They can’t afford to be left off a rankings list.
The real losers in this system are students and their parents. A bad fit is costly, not just in dollars, but in time, energy, and psychological well-being.
The emphasis should be on finding the right fit. But finding the right fit is not easy. Subjective guidebooks like Edward Fiske’s—originally titled The New York Times Selective Guide to Colleges—are very useful and consciously do not include rankings. Ted changed his three-category rating system to make it more difficult to simply add " stars" and rank-list colleges. Even families who can afford to visit lots of colleges and endure the backward-walking tours find that campus personalities soon blur in their memory.
Thus it is not surprising that anxious, busy parents turn to rankings for shorthand comfort. Unfortunately, the data that U. S. News and other media companies are collecting are largely irrelevant. As a result, the rankings they generate are not meaningless, just misleading.
Some examples: U. S. News places a good deal of emphasis on the percentage of faculty who hold a "terminal degree"—typically a Ph. D. Unfortunately, a terminal degree does not correlate(相关的)in any way with whether that professor is a good teacher. It also doesn’t improve that professor’s accessibility to students. In fact, there is usually such a correlation: the more senior the professor, the less time they have for undergraduates.
U. S. News’ second most heavily weighted factor—after a college’s six-year graduation rate—is a peer assessment of colleges by college presidents and admissions deans. You read that right; administrators are asked to evaluate colleges that are competitive with their own school. If not an complete conflict of interest, this measure is highly suspect.
Even some seemingly reasonable "inputs" are often meaningless. U. S. News heavily weights the number of classes with fewer than 20 students. But small classes are like comfort food: it is what high-school kids are familiar with. They have never sat in a large lecture hall with a very interesting speaker. So it is not something they could look forward or value.
While most rankings suffer from major problems in criteria(标准)and inputs, the biggest problem is simpler; all the ranking systems use weightings that reflect the editors’ personal biases. Very simply, some editors’ priorities are undoubtedly going be different from what is important to me. Assuredly, my preferences are different from my kids’. And both will differ markedly from our neighbors’ objectives.
Colleges say they truly want to attract kids for whom the school will be a good fit. To make good on that promise, colleges need to provide families with insight, not just information; and they need to focus on outputs, not just inputs. Collecting and sharing four sets of very different data would be a good start;Better insight into the quality of education a student will get on that campus. Colleges need to share the exam scores for all students applying to medical school, law school, business school, and graduate programs. These tests reflect not just the ability of the kids who’ve gone to that college, but what they’ve learned in the three-plus years they’ve attended.Colleges need to assess a campus’ "happiness" coefficient(系数). A happy campus is a more productive learning environment; and one that has a lower incidence of alcohol and drug abuse.The full debt that families incur(招致); not just student debt.The salaries of graduates one, five, and 10 years after graduation.
A fifth useful metric is what employers—both nationally and regionally—think of graduates from particular colleges. Hiring preferences are a useful proxy(代表)for reputation.
The last piece in enabling families to find a better fit will come from entrepreneurs. Some smart " kid" will develop an online tool that will allow students and parents to take this new college-reported data and assign weighting factors to the characteristics that are important to them. The tool would then generate a customized ranking of colleges that reflects the family’s priorities—not some editor’s.
Colleges may complain about the rankings, but they are complicit(串通一气的)in keeping them. It is reminiscent(怀旧的)of the classic Claude Raines line in Casablanca; "I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!" If colleges really want kids for whom their college is a good fit, they will collect and publish the types of honest data that will give families a better basis for smart decisions.
The customized ranking of colleges generated by an online tool does not indicate some editor’s priorities but______.
选项
答案
the family’s(priorities)
解析
本题考查在线生成的由客户定制的大学排名不是反映某些编者的倾向而是反映了什么。根据定位句可知,这样生成的排名反映了家庭的倾向。此处要求填入名词性短语作介词宾语,故the family’s(priorities)为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wSc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Boy,tourismreallyisabigbusinessthesedays.It’s【B1】______.Itinvolveshotels,transportation,restaurants,shops,andth
Boy,tourismreallyisabigbusinessthesedays.It’s【B1】______.Itinvolveshotels,transportation,restaurants,shops,andth
A、ThewomanshouldbuysomeJewelryinstead.B、ThewomanshouldbuyabatteryfromtheSmith’sJewelry.C、Heknowswhat’swrong
Thescientistsmadeapredictionthat______(气候变化会产生灾难性的后果).
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulous(人口多的)countries.ButsinceChinalaunchedafamilyp
GeneticTestingGenetictestingistransformingmedicineandthewayfamiliesthinkabouttheirhealth.Asscienceuncovers
Geographyisthestudyoftherelationshipbetweenpeopleandtheland.Geographers(地理学家)compareandcontrast(67)placesonthee
DistanceEducation1.在中国,远程教育发展迅速2.远程教育加强了发达地区与贫困地区、国内院校与国外院校之间的联系3.然而中国的远程教育还不是很发达
A、Drawingpictures.B、Buyingcameras.C、Takingphotos.D、Doingbusiness.C女士问:“你给别人拍照时,会让他们知道吗?”男士回答:“我尽量不让他们知道,因为我不喜欢人们对着照相机摆姿势
现代人类现代人类约公元前50000年第一次从中亚或印度来到中国。这些石器时代的人,居住在洞穴中,穿着毛皮。公元前4000年左右,这些人开始种植水稻,并饲养羊和鸡。约公元前3000年,他们开始使用陶器,并住在房子里。到公元前2000年,中国人已进入
随机试题
A.百会、神门B.肾俞C.印堂D.气海、肺俞、足三里遗尿肾阳虚者加
左肾上腺解剖描述中,下列哪一项最确切
患者女,67岁。发现乳腺包块1个月余,伴乳头溢液,X线图像如下,最有可能的诊断是
试戴时,可采用如下方法判断颌位关系是否正确,除了
王某过世后留下的6间房屋应由哪些人分配?各自应分得多少?为什么?如王乙要求以自己的名义代位请求孙某支付车祸致人损害的赔偿金,其主张能否得到支持?为什么?
以下属于准公共产品的是()。
你是一个工作组的组长,你们组的小马性格直爽。只对组里很有才能的同事非常尊敬,对其他同事则爱答不理。请问你如何与他沟通?
A、正确B、错误B
Peoplefrommanyplacesweredrawntothecitybyitsgrowingeconomy.
It’spossibletoadmireOprahWinfreyandstillwishHarvardhadn’tawardedheranhonorarydoctoroflawdegreeandthecommenc
最新回复
(
0
)