首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swep
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swep
admin
2018-09-19
112
问题
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swept aside by the mechanical loom. Over the past 30 years the digital revolution has displaced many of the mid-skill jobs that underpinned 20th-century middle-class life. Typists, ticket agents, bank tellers and many production-line jobs have been dispensed with, just as the weavers were.
(2)For those who believe that technological progress has made the world a better place, such churn is a natural part of rising prosperity. Although innovation kills some jobs, it creates new and better ones, as a more productive society becomes richer and its wealthier inhabitants demand more goods and services. Optimism remains the right starting-point, but for workers the dislocating effects of technology may make themselves evident faster than its benefits. Even if new jobs and wonderful products emerge, in the short term income gaps will widen, causing huge social dislocation and perhaps even changing politics.
(3)Why be worried? It is partly just a matter of history repeating itself. In the early part of the Industrial Revolution the rewards of increasing productivity went disproportionately to capital: later on, labor reaped most of the benefits. The pattern today is similar. The prosperity unleashed by the digital revolution has gone overwhelmingly to the owners of capital and the highest-skilled workers. Over the past three decades, labor’s share of output has shrunk globally from 64% to 59%. Meanwhile, the share of income going to the top 1% in America has risen from around 9% in the 1970s to 22% today. Unemployment is at alarming levels in much of the rich world, and not just for cyclical reasons. Fifteen years ago, 65% of working-age Americans were in work: since then the proportion has fallen, during good years as well as bad, to the current level of 59%.
(4)Worse, it seems likely that this wave of technological disruption to the job market has only just started. From driverless cars to clever household gadgets, innovations that already exist could destroy swathes of jobs that have hitherto been untouched. The public sector is one obvious target: it has proved singularly resistant to tech-driven reinvention. But the step change in what computers can do will have a powerful effect on middle-class jobs in the private sector too.
(5)Until now the jobs most vulnerable to machines were those that involved routine, repetitive tasks. But thanks to the exponential rise in processing power and the ubiquity of digitised information ("big data"), computers are increasingly able to perform complicated tasks more cheaply and effectively than people. Clever industrial robots can quickly "learn" a set of human actions. Services may be even more vulnerable. Computers can already detect intruders in a closed-circuit camera picture more reliably than a human can. By comparing reams of financial or biometric data, they can often diagnose fraud or illness more accurately than any number of accountants or doctors.
(6)At the same time, the digital revolution is transforming the process of innovation itself. Thanks to off-the-shelf code from the internet and platforms that host services (such as Amazon’s cloud computing), provide distribution (Apple’s app store)and offer marketing (Facebook), the number of digital startups has exploded. Just as computer-games designers invented a product that humanity never knew it needed but now cannot do without, so these firms will no doubt dream up new goods and services to employ millions. But for now they are singularly light on workers. When Instagram, a popular photo-sharing site, was sold to Facebook for about $1 billion in 2012, it had 30 million customers and employed 13 people. Kodak, which filed for bankruptcy a few months earlier, employed 145,000 people in its heyday.
(7)The problem is one of timing as much as anything. Google now employs 46,000 people. But it takes years for new industries to grow, whereas the disruption a startup causes to incumbents is felt sooner. Airbnb may turn homeowners with spare rooms into entrepreneurs, but it poses a direct threat to the lower end of the hotel business—a massive employer.
(8)If this analysis is halfway correct, the social effects will be huge. Many of the jobs most at risk are lower down the ladder (logistics, haulage), whereas the skills that are least vulnerable to automation (creativity, managerial expertise)tend to be higher up, so median wages are likely to remain stagnant for some time and income gaps are likely to widen.
(9)Anger about rising inequality is bound to grow, but politicians will find it hard to address the problem. Shunning progress would be as futile now as the Luddites’ protests against mechanised looms were in the 1810s, because any country that tried to stop would be left behind by competitors eager to embrace new technology. The freedom to raise taxes on the rich to punitive levels will be similarly constrained by the mobility of capital and highly skilled labour.
(10)The main way in which governments can help their people through this dislocation is through education systems. One of the reasons for the improvement in workers’ fortunes in the latter part of the Industrial Revolution was because schools were built to educate them—a dramatic change at the time. Now those schools themselves need to be changed, to foster the creativity that humans will need to set them a-part from computers. There should be less rote-learning and more critical thinking. Technology itself will help, whether through MOOCs (massive open online courses)or even video games that simulate the skills needed for work.
(11)Yet however well people are taught, their abilities will remain unequal, and in a world which is increasingly polarised economically, many will find their job prospects dimmed and wages squeezed. The best way of helping them is not, as many on the left seem to think, to push up minimum wages. Jacking up the floor too far would accelerate the shift from human workers to computers. Better to top up low wages with public money so that anyone who works has a reasonable income, through a bold expansion of the tax credits that countries such as America and Britain use.
(12)Innovation has brought great benefits to humanity. Nobody in their right mind would want to return to the world of handloom weavers. But the benefits of technological progress are unevenly distributed, especially in the early stages of each new wave, and it is up to governments to spread them. In the 19th century it took the threat of revolution to bring about progressive reforms. Today’s governments would do well to start making the changes needed before their people get angry.
Why is it harder for the politicians to address the problem?
选项
A、The mobility of the national capital is confined.
B、Protest against digitalized technology is singularly strong.
C、They cannot afford to get around the new technology.
D、The analysis of new technology is only halfway correct.
答案
C
解析
第9段第3句提到,回避进步(Shunning progress)是徒劳的,根据语境可知,此处的progress指的就是科技的进步,故选项C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/whEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ApprenticeshipshavelongbeenpopularinEurope,butworkforce-orientedhighschooltrainingisnearlyascommonin【M1】______U
Despitealloftheadvancesinmedicine,healthcareprovidershaveneverbeenonthecuttingedgeofnewbusinessandmarketin
Formany,thepursuitofhappinessisalsothepursuitofprosperity.PartoftheAmericandreamistheabilitytoprovide【M1】__
IhavebeenteachingforlongerthanIcaretosay,andalwaysofferacourseforenteringfreshmen.AndI’vediscoveredsomet
Changesinthetechnologyofcommunicationareoccurringsorapidlythatwehumanbeingsnowmovethroughacloudofmessagesa
Amazon,whichgotitsstartsellingbooksonline,announcedthisyearthat,forthefirsttime,itsdigitalbookshadoutsold
TheInternetprovidesanamazingforumforthefreeexchangeofideas.Giventherelativelyafewrestrictionsgoverningaccess
“假若我再上一次大学”,多少年来我曾反复思考过这个问题。我曾一度得到两个截然相反的答案:一个是最好不要再上大学,“知识越多越反动”,我实在心有余悸。一个是仍然要上,而且偏偏还要学现在学的这一套。后一个想法最终占了上风,一直到现在。我为什么还要上大学而又偏偏
A、It’sharmful.B、It’ssurprising.C、It’sunlucky.D、It’snormal.A根据句(5)可知,男士认为,人们在食物上的花费大于在娱乐上的花费不足为奇,毕竟人都要吃东西,但是美国人把越来越多的钱花费在
当我在小学毕了业的时候,亲友一致的愿意我去学手艺,好帮助母亲。我晓得我应当去找饭吃,以减轻母亲的勤劳困苦。可是,我也愿意升学。我偷偷地考入了师范学校——制服,饭食,书籍,宿处,都由学校供给。只有这样,我才敢对母亲提升学的话。入学,要交十元的保证会。这是一笔
随机试题
夜间驾驶机动车在窄路、窄桥会车怎样使用灯光?
患者,女,45岁,因输液出现静脉炎,进行湿热敷时,下列操作不当的是
甲向乙借款50万元注册成立A公司,乙与甲约定在A公司取得营业执照的第二天,乙的B公司向A公司借款50万元。A公司取得营业执照后,由甲经手将A公司50万元借给B公司。关于甲的行为性质,下列哪一选项是正确的?(2013年卷二13题)
在工作流程图中,菱形框表示()。
()是按照规定的抽样方案,随机的从一批或一个过程中抽取少量个体进行的检验。
教学科目又称学科,是根据一定的(),从某一学科中选择出基本事实、基本概念、基本原理,并按照一定的逻辑——心理顺序重新组织构成的新的知识体系。
公安机关治安行政管理工作的主要任务有()。
马斯洛需要层次论中最基本的需要是()。
已知两个线性方程组同解,求m,n,t.
()传统医药()龙舟节()假山()军阵
最新回复
(
0
)