首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2011-02-11
72
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and i990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then--are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"-- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
When the author is talking about the Jewish Population Survey, he seems ______.
选项
A、to believe the shrinking of the Jews in America
B、to support the rejection of full integration into society
C、to blame United Jewish Communities
D、to be willing to tolerate the fault of United Jewish Communities
答案
C
解析
文章的主要内容是揭示调查所得出的犹太人口下降谬论并指出其负面影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wieO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、BritishB、AmericanC、IndianD、IranianC考查学生对新闻中Indian-born和试题中byorigin的理解。
Eliot’sinterestedinpoetryinabout1902withthediscoveryofRomantic.HehadrecalledhowhewasinitiatedintopoetrybyE
Althoughthedistributionofrecordedmusicwentdigitalwiththeintroductionofthecompactdiscintheearly1980s,technolog
A、thepresident’sfamilyB、thepresident’sintegrityC、officials’abuseofmoneyD、officials’illegalmansionsC考查推理判断能力。新闻的中心问
BritishPrimeMinisterTonyBlairbelongsto______.
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】______anotherkindofexaminationinadditiontoobje
______andWilliamShakespearearcthebestrepresentativesoftheEnglishhumanism.
DreamFunctionsDreamingisacommonphenomenon.Practicallyallpeopledream,althoughwhethertheycan【1】______themisa
DreamFunctionsDreamingisacommonphenomenon.Practicallyallpeopledream,althoughwhethertheycan【1】______themisa
随机试题
《天上的街市》是义务教育课程标准实验教科书七年级上册的一篇课文,请根据课文特点完成下列问题。天上的街市郭沫若远远的街灯明了,好像闪着无数的明星。天上的明星现了,好像点着无数的街灯。我想那缥缈(piāomiǎo)的空中,定然有美丽的街市。街市上
初产妇,26岁,妊娠40周,临产12h,宫口扩张8cm持续2h,胎头未下降。腹部检查:胎儿为头先露,肢体在腹部于右前方明显扪及,胎背在左后方,耻骨上扪及胎头,额隆突明显。下列阴道检查结果与腹部检查相符合的是
急性白血病FAB分型中,ALL-L2的特点是
降落伞计划(ParachutesPlan),即目标公司与其公司职员订立雇佣合同,一旦目标公司被收购,公司必须向他们立即支付巨额去职费或退休金,其中与公司员工签立的为()
个人征信系统对采集到的数据的处理方式为()。
客户的开户资料、委托记录、交易记录和内部业务经营的各项资料,证券公司应当至少保存()年。
组织的人力资源战略制定包括( )等阶段。
企业持有交易性金融资产期间对于被投资单位宣告发放的现金股利或企业在资产负债表日按分期付患、一次还本债券投资的票面利率计算的利息,应当确认为应收项目,计入“应收股利”或“应收利息”科目,并()。
下列关于法律意识的表述,能够成立的有()。(2011年多选49)
在FTP协议中,请求使用被动模式建立数据连接可以使用的命令是()。
最新回复
(
0
)