首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2011-02-11
60
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and i990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then--are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"-- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
When the author is talking about the Jewish Population Survey, he seems ______.
选项
A、to believe the shrinking of the Jews in America
B、to support the rejection of full integration into society
C、to blame United Jewish Communities
D、to be willing to tolerate the fault of United Jewish Communities
答案
C
解析
文章的主要内容是揭示调查所得出的犹太人口下降谬论并指出其负面影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wieO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts.【1】______InAmerica,moneysupplyconsists
Althoughthedistributionofrecordedmusicwentdigitalwiththeintroductionofthecompactdiscintheearly1980s,technolog
TheobjectiveoftheChartistMovementwasdemocraticrightsforallmen,andittookitsnamefrom"______".
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】______anotherkindofexaminationinadditiontoobje
______andWilliamShakespearearcthebestrepresentativesoftheEnglishhumanism.
TheFamilyThenandNowThingswerenevereasywithinthefamily.Butatatimewhenthefamilywasorientedtowardtheprod
TheCinemaThefirstmovingpictures,developedinthe1890’s,weredifferentfromwhatweknowaboutcinematoday.Because
Australiahasalwaysbeenacontinentwithfewpeoplemainlybecause______.
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysandyoumightevengetareply,providedyouaskit
随机试题
A.肾上腺素B.促肾上腺皮质激素C.两者均是D.两者均非通过cGMP-蛋白激酶途径发挥作用的是
主动脉瓣关闭不全导致心脏负荷加重的是
一奶牛长期患病,临床表现咳嗽、呼吸困难、消瘦和贫血等。死后剖检可见多种器官组织,尤其是肺、淋巴结和乳房等处有散在大小不等的结节性病变,切面有似豆腐渣样、质地松软的灰白色或黄白色物质。进行病理组织学检查,似豆腐渣样物为()
炎症的基本病理变化包括_________、_________、_________。
对同一类型的问题寻找不同类型的答案可以培养学生具有()。
我国城市基础设施等城镇化建设的资金筹措方式,是随经济金融体制改革逐步变化的。从l979年开始,国家在基本建设投资领域实行财政拨款改为银行贷款的试点;上世纪90年代,分税制改革和政策性银行的设立进一步推动了城市基础设施融资的市场化。经过多年改革发展,目前地
有关现代教育特征的描述,不正确的是()
李某以给吃麻醉糖的方法将小玲(女,7岁)骗走,意图贩卖营利,后因行情不好,多次未能成交,一直将其用来供自己使唤、奴役,后来在一次交易尚未达成之前,李某被公安机关抓获。则其行为属于哪种犯罪形态?()
FlorenceNightingaleFlorenceNightingalewasborninFlorence,Italy,whileherwealthyEnglishparentsweretravelinginEurop
(1)Presidentwillmakehiscaseforhis$1.6trilliontaxcutplan,deliveringaspeechatacommunitycenterinSt.Louis.The
最新回复
(
0
)