The Internet, e-commerce and globalization are making a new economic era possible. By the middle of the 21 st century, capitalis

admin2015-02-12  26

问题     The Internet, e-commerce and globalization are making a new economic era possible. By the middle of the 21 st century, capitalist markets will largely be replaced by a new kind of economic system based on networked relationships, contractual arrangements and access rights.
    Has the quality of our lives at work, at home and in our communities increased in direct proportion to all the new Internet and business-to-business Intranet services being introduced into our lives? I have asked this question to hundreds of CEOs and corporate executives in Europe and the United States. Surprisingly, virtually everyone has said, "No, quite the contrary." The very people responsible for ushering in what some have called a "technological renaissance" say they are working longer hours, feel more stressed, are more impatient, and are even less civil in their dealings with colleagues and friends—not to mention strangers. And what’s more revealing, they place much of the blame on the very same technologies they are so aggressively championing.
    The techno gurus promised us that access would make life more convenient and give us more time. Instead, the very technological wonders that were supposed to liberate us have begun to enslave us in a web of connections from which there seems to be no easy escape.
    If an earlier generation was preoccupied with the quest to enclose a vast geographic frontier, the dotcom generation, it seems, is more caught up in the colonization of time. Every spare moment of our time is being filled with some form of commercial connection, making time itself the most scarce of all resources. Our e-mail, voice mail and cell phones, our 24-hour electronic trading markets, online banking services, all-night e-commerce, and 24-hour Internet news and entertainment all holler for our attention.
    And while we have created every kind of labor-and time-saving device to service our needs, we are beginning to feel like we have less time available to us than any other humans in history. That is because the great proliferation of labor-and time-saving services only increases the diversity, pace and flow of commodified activity around us. For example, e-mail is a great convenience. However, we now find ourselves spending much of our day frantically responding to each other’s electronic messages. The cell phone is a great time-saver. Except now we are always potentially in reach of someone else who wants our attention.
    Social conservatives talk about the decline in civility and blame it on the loss of a moral compass and religious values. Has anyone bothered to ask whether the hyperspeed culture is making all of us less patient and less willing to listen and defer, consider and reflect?
    Maybe we need to ask what kinds of connections really count and what types of access really matter in the e-economy era. If this new technology revolution is only about hyperefficiency, then we risk losing something even more precious than time—our sense of what it means to be a caring human being.
In the sixth paragraph the author suggests that______.

选项 A、new technologies may make people more impatient
B、social conservatives do not understand the importance of technology
C、the speed of modern culture may improve our moral and religious values
D、people in the technology sector are less civil than those in other fields

答案A

解析 属态度推断题。根据文章第六段的内容,尤其最后一句:有没有人问过是不是这种高速文化把大家弄得失去了耐心,不愿意倾听和服从,不愿意深思和反省?此句以疑问句的形式出现,其实暗示着作者有此观点,也是在提醒并引导读者的思路。因此,选项A“可能是新技术使我们大家变得越来越不耐烦”正确。选项B、D没有推理依据,选项C与本段第一句内容不符(社会上的保守派认为道德规范和宗教价值的沦丧使人们的文明礼貌程度降低了)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wo74777K
0

最新回复(0)