首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance,
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance,
admin
2019-08-01
427
问题
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance, we tend to look harder for flaws in a study when we don’t agree with its conclusions and are more critical of evidence that undermines our point of view. So birthers dismiss evidence offered by Hawaiian officials that Obama’s birth certificate is real, and death-penalty foes are adept at finding flaws in studies that conclude capital punishment deters crime. While motivated reasoning may cloud our view of reality and keep us from objectively assessing evidence, Mercier says, by letting us to accept flaws(real or not)in that evidence it prepares us to mount a destroying strategy in arguments.
[B]Another form of flawed reasoning shows up in logic puzzles. Consider the syllogism "No C are B; all B are A; therefore some A are not C. " Is it true? Fewer than 10 percent of us figure out that it is. One reason is that to evaluate its validity requires constructing counterexamples(finding an A that is a C, for instance). But finding counterexamples can, in general, invent our confidence in our own arguments.
[C]Women are bad drivers, Saddam plotted 9-11, Obama was not born in America, and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction: to believe any of these requires stopping some of our critical-thinking faculties and succumbing instead to the kind of irrationality that drives the logically minded crazy. It helps, for instance, to use confirmation bias. It also helps not to test your beliefs against empirical data; not to subject beliefs to the plausibility test; and to be guided by emotion.
[D]Even the sunk-cost fallacy, which has tripped up everyone from supporters of a losing war to a losing stock, reflects reasoning that turns its back on logic but wins arguments because the emotions it appeals to are universal. If Mercier is right, the sunk-cost fallacy, confirmation bias, and the other forms of irrationality will be with us as long as humans like to argue. That is, forever.
[E]An idea sweeping through the ranks of philosophers and cognitive scientists suggests why this is so. The reason we succumb to confirmation bias, why we are blind to counterexamples, and why we fall short of Cartesian logic in so many other ways is that these oversights have a purpose: they help us " invent and evaluate arguments that are intended to persuade other people," says psychologist Hugo Mercier of the University of Pennsylvania. Failures of logic, he propose, are in fact effective arms to win arguments. That puts poor reasoning in a completely different light. Arguing, after all, is less about seeking truth than about overcoming opposing views. So while confirmation bias, for instance, may mislead us about what’s true and real, by letting examples that support our view monopolize our memory and perception, it maximizes the arms we use when trying to convince someone that, say, he really is "late all the time. "
[F]Forms of reasoning that are good for solving problems and winning arguments lose out, over the course of evolution. In fact, rationality refers to the success of goal attainment, whatever those goals may be. Sometimes, rationality is equated with behavior that is self-interested to the point of being selfish. Sometimes rationality implies having complete knowledge about all the details of a given situation.
[G]The fact that humans are subject to all these failures of rational thought seems to make no sense. Reason is supposed to be the highest achievement of the human mind, and the route to knowledge and wise decisions. But as psychologists have been documenting since the 1960s, humans are really, really bad at reasoning. It’s not just that we follow our emotions so often, in contexts from voting to ethics. No, even when we intend to deploy the full force of our rational faculties, we often failed.
Order:
选项
答案
E
解析
[G]项提出问题:人类不善于理性思考,即便我们有意愿充分发挥我们的理性思考的能力,也总是失败。因此下文应该是针对这个问题的分析。综观其余的几个选项,只有[E]项符合逻辑,[E]项首句提到:在心理学家和认知科学家中间普遍流行的一种观点解释了其中的原因(whythis is so),这个原因就是指人类不善于理性思考的原因,因此[E]项为答案。[B]项首句提到Another form of flawed reasoning,而[G]项并没有说明一种flawed reasoning的形式,因此可以排除;同样,[D]项也提到了非理性思考有利于争辩,而上文的[G]项并未提到,因此可以排除;[F]项首句提到了Forms of reasoning,而后面一直在定义理性(rationality),这和[G]项也无法衔接,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xB2Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
LastyearnearlyonemillionAmericansfiledforbankruptcy.Thatisfarfewerthanthenumberwhousedtoseekbankruptcyprote
Zoe,yourcurrentcolleagues,isleavingforanewpositionatadifferentcompany.Writealettertocongratulateheronthene
TheBigMacindexisbuiltontheideaofpurchasing-powerparity,thetheorythatinthelongruncurrencieswillconvergeunti
Retrofittinghousestouselessenergyshouldbeano-brainerforhomeowners.【C1】______time,moneyspentonwaystoreduceheat
Retrofittinghousestouselessenergyshouldbeano-brainerforhomeowners.【C1】______time,moneyspentonwaystoreduceheat
FormonthsTwitter,themicro-bloggingservice,hasreceivedthekindoffreeattentionofwhichmostcompaniescanonlydream.
FormonthsTwitter,themicro-bloggingservice,hasreceivedthekindoffreeattentionofwhichmostcompaniescanonlydream.
Itisagoodtimetobeafisherman.Theglobalfish-priceindexoftheUN’sFoodandAgriculturalOrganization(FAO)hitareco
Americanpresidentsseemtoagebeforeoureyes.Butthecommonbeliefthathigh-officestressgraysourleadersfasterthan【C1】
Biographiescanbewearisomecontrivances,oftentoolongandtoodetailedfortheirowngood.Biographersmakethemistakeofs
随机试题
企业营销宏观环境中的政治因素有()
下列B受体阻断药中哪个兼有α受体阻断作用
货币供给是()的经济手段。
甲公司2013年至2015年与投资业务相关的资料如下。(1)2013年5月20日,甲公司与乙公司的原股东A公司签订股权转让合同。合同约定:甲公司向A公司购买其所持有的乙公司80%的股权;以乙公司2013年5月31日经评估确认的净资产价值为基础确定股权转让
十八届三中全会指出,公有制为主体、多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度,是中国特色社会主义制度的重要支柱,也是社会主义市场经济体制的根基。公有制经济和非公有制经济都是社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分,都是我国经济社会发展的重要基础。必须毫不动摇巩固和发展公有
A、 B、 C、 D、 D(2+3+3+0)÷2=4,(3+5+2+14)÷2=12,(2+4+4+6)÷2=8。
2011年第三季度,江苏城镇居民人均可支配收入的月平均数是()。
数学教师在教应用题时,一再强调要学生看清题目,必要时可以画一些示意图,这样做的目的是为了()
根据我国民法的规定,下列不适用不当得利的是()。
假设某种型号的螺丝钉的重量是随机变量,期望值为50克,标准差为5克.求:(Ⅰ)100个螺丝钉一袋的重量超过5.1千克的概率;(Ⅱ)每箱螺丝钉装有500袋,500袋中最多有4%的重量超过5.1千克的概率.
最新回复
(
0
)