首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance,
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance,
admin
2019-08-01
433
问题
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance, we tend to look harder for flaws in a study when we don’t agree with its conclusions and are more critical of evidence that undermines our point of view. So birthers dismiss evidence offered by Hawaiian officials that Obama’s birth certificate is real, and death-penalty foes are adept at finding flaws in studies that conclude capital punishment deters crime. While motivated reasoning may cloud our view of reality and keep us from objectively assessing evidence, Mercier says, by letting us to accept flaws(real or not)in that evidence it prepares us to mount a destroying strategy in arguments.
[B]Another form of flawed reasoning shows up in logic puzzles. Consider the syllogism "No C are B; all B are A; therefore some A are not C. " Is it true? Fewer than 10 percent of us figure out that it is. One reason is that to evaluate its validity requires constructing counterexamples(finding an A that is a C, for instance). But finding counterexamples can, in general, invent our confidence in our own arguments.
[C]Women are bad drivers, Saddam plotted 9-11, Obama was not born in America, and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction: to believe any of these requires stopping some of our critical-thinking faculties and succumbing instead to the kind of irrationality that drives the logically minded crazy. It helps, for instance, to use confirmation bias. It also helps not to test your beliefs against empirical data; not to subject beliefs to the plausibility test; and to be guided by emotion.
[D]Even the sunk-cost fallacy, which has tripped up everyone from supporters of a losing war to a losing stock, reflects reasoning that turns its back on logic but wins arguments because the emotions it appeals to are universal. If Mercier is right, the sunk-cost fallacy, confirmation bias, and the other forms of irrationality will be with us as long as humans like to argue. That is, forever.
[E]An idea sweeping through the ranks of philosophers and cognitive scientists suggests why this is so. The reason we succumb to confirmation bias, why we are blind to counterexamples, and why we fall short of Cartesian logic in so many other ways is that these oversights have a purpose: they help us " invent and evaluate arguments that are intended to persuade other people," says psychologist Hugo Mercier of the University of Pennsylvania. Failures of logic, he propose, are in fact effective arms to win arguments. That puts poor reasoning in a completely different light. Arguing, after all, is less about seeking truth than about overcoming opposing views. So while confirmation bias, for instance, may mislead us about what’s true and real, by letting examples that support our view monopolize our memory and perception, it maximizes the arms we use when trying to convince someone that, say, he really is "late all the time. "
[F]Forms of reasoning that are good for solving problems and winning arguments lose out, over the course of evolution. In fact, rationality refers to the success of goal attainment, whatever those goals may be. Sometimes, rationality is equated with behavior that is self-interested to the point of being selfish. Sometimes rationality implies having complete knowledge about all the details of a given situation.
[G]The fact that humans are subject to all these failures of rational thought seems to make no sense. Reason is supposed to be the highest achievement of the human mind, and the route to knowledge and wise decisions. But as psychologists have been documenting since the 1960s, humans are really, really bad at reasoning. It’s not just that we follow our emotions so often, in contexts from voting to ethics. No, even when we intend to deploy the full force of our rational faculties, we often failed.
Order:
选项
答案
E
解析
[G]项提出问题:人类不善于理性思考,即便我们有意愿充分发挥我们的理性思考的能力,也总是失败。因此下文应该是针对这个问题的分析。综观其余的几个选项,只有[E]项符合逻辑,[E]项首句提到:在心理学家和认知科学家中间普遍流行的一种观点解释了其中的原因(whythis is so),这个原因就是指人类不善于理性思考的原因,因此[E]项为答案。[B]项首句提到Another form of flawed reasoning,而[G]项并没有说明一种flawed reasoning的形式,因此可以排除;同样,[D]项也提到了非理性思考有利于争辩,而上文的[G]项并未提到,因此可以排除;[F]项首句提到了Forms of reasoning,而后面一直在定义理性(rationality),这和[G]项也无法衔接,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xB2Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
ThepastfiveyearshavebeenabadtimetobeataxpayerinEurope.Acrossthecontinent,governmentshavereliedheavilyonta
EvenbeforeeconomistHowardDaviesthinkingwheretoputextraairportcapacityinBritain,rejectingtheideaofbuildingabi
EvenbeforeeconomistHowardDaviesthinkingwheretoputextraairportcapacityinBritain,rejectingtheideaofbuildingabi
Writeanessaybasedonthechartbelow.Inyourwriting,youshould1)interpretthechart,and2)giveyourcomments.
FormonthsTwitter,themicro-bloggingservice,hasreceivedthekindoffreeattentionofwhichmostcompaniescanonlydream.
Whenmymother’shealthwasfailing,Iwasthe"bad"sisterwholivedfarawayandwasn’tinvolved.Mysisterhelpedmyparents.
Whenmymother’shealthwasfailing,Iwasthe"bad"sisterwholivedfarawayandwasn’tinvolved.Mysisterhelpedmyparents.
Americanpresidentsseemtoagebeforeoureyes.Butthecommonbeliefthathigh-officestressgraysourleadersfasterthan【C1】
Encouragementandpraisecancomeinmanyforms,andsomewaysarebetterforchilddevelopmentthanothers.Researchersatthe
Encouragementandpraisecancomeinmanyforms,andsomewaysarebetterforchilddevelopmentthanothers.Researchersatthe
随机试题
我国门脉高压症主要发病原因是
A.推动作用B.温煦作用C.防御作用D.固摄作用E.调控作用津液输布和排泄的动力是指气的
传染病与感染性疾病的主要区别是
物业资产管理的职能包括()。
中、低压地下燃气管道可采用(),但应符合有关标准的规定。
对于企业已经出租的土地使用权以及已经出租的建筑物等,作为投资性房地产的确认时点为租赁开始日。()
某出租车司机因为违章被某公安机关交警部门吊销了驾驶执照。该司机认为处罚过重,并且给其造成了经济损失,其可以依法()。
阅读下列说明和HTML文本,分析其中嵌入的JavaScript脚本,将应填入(n)处的语句填到对应栏内。[说明]在文本框中实现时钟显示功能,格式如下:“-年-月-日小时:分:秒星期几”[HTML文本]<html>
在下列Java组件中,不属于容器的是______。
Thechildren______manytimesnottoswiminthereservoir.
最新回复
(
0
)