首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2013-04-25
112
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age persen. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:
(a) get a job and work until they die;
(b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or
(c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.(A)But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The word recalcitrant in Paragraph 13 is closest in meaning to ______.
选项
A、relent
B、stolid
C、unruly
D、unfilial
答案
D
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词recalcitrant的理解。该词所在句子的意思是:如果recalcitrant子女知道这是一种公开的审判……既然受审判的是子女,根据上下文可以判断出recalcitrant的意思是“叛逆的,反抗的”,因此,选项D(不孝顺的)为最佳答案。选项A(温和的)、B(迟钝的)和C(不守规矩的)都是干扰项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xOyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
CompletethenotesonthepoliceusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachgap.•don’tbeaggressive•donottrytobribepolice
Theprofessorwantsthestudentstopretendthattheyare______.
Theprofessorwantsthestudentstopretendthattheyare______.
Matchthesoundswiththeircorrectmeanings.Writetheappropriateletteronyouranswersheet.A.continuoushigh-pitchedhum
Benused______asasourceofinformation.Olgasaysthataseriesof______determinesaperson’sfitnesslevel.
Questions26-30CompletethefollowingsentencesusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethesummarybelow.UseNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.PROJECTMANAGENTLastweek’sdefinitionofpro
SECTION4Questions31-40Questions31-32CompletethefollowingsentencesusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDS.
Choosethecorrectletter,A,BorC.WinridgeForestRailwayParkWhentheystarted,thefamilydecidedto
随机试题
在项目成本分析的依据中,既可对已经发生的经济活动进行核算,又可对尚未发生的经济活动进行核算的方式是()。
根据单元顶极理论,一个气候区只会出现一个气候顶极群落。()
梁桥各片主梁荷载横向分布系数之和应为1。( )
在简谐波传播过程中,沿传播方向相距(λ为波长)的两点的振动速度必定()。
“酒好不怕巷子深”反映的观念是()。
某化妆品生产企业为增值税一般纳税人,2000年10月上旬从国外进口一批散装化妆品,支付给国外的货价120万元、相关税金10万元、卖方佣金2万元、运抵我国海关前的运杂费和保险费18万元;进口机器设备一套,支付给国外的货价35万元、运抵我国海关前的运杂费和保险
在中国古代四大发明向西方传播的过程中,贡献最大的是()。
道尔顿制(2019年陕西师大、2013年西南大学、2013/2018年华东师大、2012年北京师大、2011/2013年南京师大、2010/2016年华中师大)
法律的强制作用是指法律能运用国家强制力制裁违法和犯罪行为,保障自身得以实施的作用。法律强制的主体是国家、社会成员与社会组织。国家是
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofan【C1】______shouldbemade
最新回复
(
0
)