2. 考研
  3. Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal

Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal

admin2019-06-20  53
问题    Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both "normal" and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.
   Moreover, those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non-socialist countries other than the United States. These economies employ intentional price-fixing, usually in an overt fashion. Formal price-fixing by cartel and informal price-fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are commonplace. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price-fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.
   Socialist industry also works within a framework of controlled prices. In the early 1970’s, the Soviet Union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market. But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by a free market over which they exercise little influence than are capitalist firms; rather, Soviet firms have been given the power to fix prices.
The primary purpose of the passage is to______.
选项 A、suggest methods by which economists and members of the government of the United States can recognize and combat price-fixing by large firms
B、show that in industrialized societies price-fixing and the operation of the free market are not only compatible but also mutually beneficial
C、explain the various ways in which industrialized societies can fix prices in order to stabilize the free market
D、argue that price-fixing, in one form or another, is an inevitable part of and benefit to the economy of any industrialized society
答案D
解析 主旨大意题。文章开头即将主题定位在定价的问题上，由消费者掌握定价权是自由市场论的经济学家的一贯看法，而作者则提出并分析了自由市场派观点的不合理性，指出在必要时由卖方出价的合理性和对经济发展的裨益，故[D]项为答案。文章没有讨论定价的方法，故排除[A]项和[C]项；文章批驳了自由市场论的看法，但是并没有论述卖方出价和市场定价两者之间有何关系，故排除[B]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xUra777K
本试题收录于： 翻译硕士（翻译硕士英语）题库专业硕士分类
0

翻译硕士（翻译硕士英语）

专业硕士

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)