首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
admin
2012-01-21
32
问题
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Between 1993 and 1997 in New York city violent crime fell by 39% in central Harlem and by 45% in the once-terrifying South Bronx. The latest figures released by the FBI, for 1997, show that serious crime continued to fall in all the larger cities, though a little more slowly than in 1996.
Violent crime fell by 5% in all and by slightly more in cities with over 250,000 people. Property crimes have fallen, too, by more than 20% since 1980, so that the rates for burglary and car-theft are lower in America than they are in supposedly more law-abiding Britain and Scandinavia. And people have noticed. In 1994, 31% of Americans told pollsters that crime was the most important challenge facing the country, while in 1997, only 14% thought so. Some cities’ police departments are so impressed by these figures, it is said, that they have lately taken to exaggerating the plunge in crime.
Why this has happened is anyone’s guess. Many factors — social, demographic, economic, and political — affect crime rate, so it is difficult to put a finger on the vital clue. In March this year, the FBI itself admitted it had "no idea" why rates were falling so fast.
Politicians think they know, of course. Ask Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York, why his city has made such strides in beating crime that it accounts for fully a quarter of the national decline. He will cite his policy of "zero tolerance". This concept, which sprang from a famous article by two criminologists in Atlantic Monthly in March 1982, maintains that by refusing to tolerate tiny infractions of the law — dropping litter, spray — painting walls — the authorities can create a climate in which crime of more dangerous kinds finds it impossible to flourish. The Atlantic article was called "Broken Windows"; if one window in a building was left broken, it argued, all the others would soon be gone. The answer: mend the window, fast.
The metro system in Washington, D.C was the first place where zero tolerance drew public attention, especially when one passenger was arrested for eating a banana. The policy seemed absurdly pernickety, yet it worked: in a better environment, people’s behavior improved, and crime dropped. Mr. Giuliani, taking this theme to heart, has gone further. He has cracked down on windscreen-cleaners, public urinates, graffiti, and even jaywalkers. He has excoriated New York’s famously sullen cabdrivers, and wants all New Yorkers to be nicer to each other. Tony Blair, visiting from London, has been hugely impressed.
But is this cleanliness and civility the main reason why crime has fallen? It seems unlikely "Zero tolerance" can also be a distraction, making too many policemen spend too much time handing out littering tickets and parking fines while, some streets away, young men are being murdered for their trainers. It is localized, too: though lower Manhattan or the Washington metro can show the uncanny orderliness of a communist regime, other parts of the city — the areas of highest crime maybe left largely untreated.
William Bratton, New York’s police commissioner until Mr. Giuliani fired him for stealing his thunder, has a different explanation for the fall in crime. It came about mostly, he believes, because he reorganized the police department and restored its morale: giving his officers better guns, letting them take more decisions for themselves, and moving them away from desk jobs and out into the struts. Mr. Bratton made his precinct commanders personally responsible for reducing crimes on their own beats. There was no passing the buck, and those who failed were fired. Within a year, he had replaced half of them.
Where in the passage does the author give a definition?
选项
A、The last sentence in the 1st paragraph.
B、The 2nd sentence in the 2nd paragraph.
C、The 4th sentence in the 4th paragraph.
D、The 2nd sentence in the 5th paragraph.
答案
C
解析
第四段中提到了zero tolerance概念,段落中对这概念进行了说明,具体是第 四段第四句。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xhXd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhyWouldTheyFalselyConfess?Whyonearthwouldaninnocentpersonfalselyconfesstocommittingacrime?Tomostpeople,
EvenIntelligentPeopleCanFail1Thestrikingthingabouttheinnovatorswhosucceededinmakingourmodernworldishow
ItcanbeinferredfromthefirstparagraphthateachbigcityinEuropeWhydopeoplethinkthatVeniceissogreat?
RonaldKahnandhiscolleaguescanmakemicelivelongerbyWhatcanbeinferredfromthepassageabouttheroutetolonglife?
ThepassagetellsusthatasachildgrowsupWhohavethebestchanceofgrowingupsuccessfully?
TheOldGateIntheMiddleAgesthevastmajorityofEuropeancitieshadwallsaroundthem.Thiswaspartlyfordefensive【C1
TheOldGateIntheMiddleAgesthevastmajorityofEuropeancitieshadwallsaroundthem.Thiswaspartlyfordefensive【C1
WhatwasSteve’sattitudetowardswomenwhowrotelovestories?WhatwereHelen’sfeelingsaboutthemovefromLondontoStrett
WhatwasSteve’sattitudetowardswomenwhowrotelovestories?WhatwereHelen’sfeelingsaboutthemovefromLondontoStrett
WherewouldhestayafterhisscholarshipyearinLondonwasover?
随机试题
内部招聘,防范“士气危机”小张和小王同一天进入了心仪已久的某公司的质检部。进入了各自梦寐已求的企业,小张和小王都是兴奋不已,在正式工作后,他们总是干劲十足,工作满意度较高,而且也为公司解决了不少质检技术和管理上的难题。尤其值得一提的是,一次供应商在
药材常用的浸出溶剂是
有关非甾体抗炎药下列说法错误的是
患者,24岁。人流术后1周,突然阴道流血增多,伴腹痛,无发热,查宫口有少量活动出血,子宫稍大稍软,压痛(±),附件正常。可能诊断是()
旅游者有权自主选择旅游产品和服务并拒绝强制交易。因此,旅游经营者在旅游活动中任何情形下均不得安排行程外的购物活动。()
笔墨与文人长相厮守,须臾不离,年深日久,似乎也具有了特殊的性灵。因此,笔可以“歌”,墨可以“舞”,“妙笔”可以“生花”,笔底可走“龙蛇”,甚至文人也被称为“墨客”——工具与人,达成了性灵的相通。在长达数千年的历史里,笔墨成为文人精神生活重要的呈现手段之一。
Thecomputercanbeprogrammedto______awholevarietyoftasks.
【特辖领地制】南京大学1999年世界古代中世纪史真题;中国人民大学2017年世界通史真题
求
Inthecircularregionshownabove,sectionsAandBrepresent3/8and5/11,respectively,oftheareaofthecircularregion.S
最新回复
(
0
)