首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
66
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
The author assumes that the readers are______.
选项
A、afraid of a nation of dictators
B、worried about the abuses of cloning
C、eager to put cloning to practical use
D、ready to be cloned
答案
B
解析
从文中第四段“But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society?Might it notbe used for destructive purposes?”可推断,读者害怕克隆手法会被滥用。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
Althoughsolutionstoaproblemareoftenthe.fruitofdirectinvestmentsintargetedresearch,themostrevolutionarysolution
Althoughsolutionstoaproblemareoftenthe.fruitofdirectinvestmentsintargetedresearch,themostrevolutionarysolution
BecauseofherdualnationalityintheUnitedStatesandMexico,Mariawasalmostrequiredtopaytaxesinbothcountriesuntil
Thebiosphereisthenamebiologistsgivetothesortofskinonthesurfaceofthisplanetthatisinhabitablebylivingorgani
Themarveloustelephoneandtelevisionnetworkthathasnowenmeshedthewholeworld,makingallmenneighbors,cannotbeextend
BuildingonthebaseofevidenceandinterpretationinHansen’s(1994)qualitativestudyofworkingpeople’sdiaries,weassigne
Hecannotseeanythingwithouthisglasses,sohemadea______ofrememberingtogetthemfixedbeforehewenttowork.
Abigdateisnervewrackingenough,letalonehavingtoworryaboutwhattowear.Haveyoueverquestionedwhetheryourensembl
A______ofsoapandtwobrightlycoloredtowelswereleftbesidethebath,thewomensmiledpolitelyatNicoleandwithdrewcar
随机试题
A.冲击性损伤B.对冲性损伤C.旋转性损伤D.机械性损伤E.间接性损伤脑损伤时,发生在对侧者称为()
为什么只有人类有下巴?一直以来,人们对下巴这一看似毫无用处的附属部位提出了多种不同解释。新研究指出,下巴的进化源于人类牙齿与下颚的萎缩,这是由于烹饪使食物变软所致。以下哪项是上述论证所依赖的假设?
当煤炭有多种用途时,作为最终产品可以列入GDP核算的是()。
根据计算得到的控制限和描点值绘制分析用控制图,判断过程处于统计控制状态,下一步需进行过程能力分析,查表得到,n=5时c4=0.94,计算得到的过程能力指数Cpk为()
波力实业公司总裁的高级助理班子中,李金是一位最不可缺少的人才,因为其他助理仅是公司业务某一方面的专家,他们仅在自己精通的领域有独到的能力,而唯独李金是一位全才,熟悉该公司全方位的业务。以下哪项如果为真,最能削弱上述论证?
艺术的民族性(山东大学2012年研)
[*]
intense成熟期的竞争仍然是激烈的。
CultureShockI.Thephasesofcultureshock1)【T1】phase【T1】________a.culturaldifferences:romantic,wonderfulandnewb.
Sendingyourchildrentopianoorviolinlessonsinabid(努力)toboosttheiracademicachievementisawasteofmoney,according
最新回复
(
0
)