首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
57
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
The author assumes that the readers are______.
选项
A、afraid of a nation of dictators
B、worried about the abuses of cloning
C、eager to put cloning to practical use
D、ready to be cloned
答案
B
解析
从文中第四段“But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society?Might it notbe used for destructive purposes?”可推断,读者害怕克隆手法会被滥用。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
Thestudyofsocialscienceismorethanthestudyoftheindividualsocialsciences.Althoughitistruethattobeagoodsoci
CarlyFiorina,Hewlett-Packard’schiefexecutive,cameoutfightingonNovember14th.Inaconferencecallwithanalysts,shean
Whydoesstorytellingendureacrosstimeandcultures?Perhapstheanswerliesinourevolutionaryroots.Astudyofthewaytha
ThePortuguesegiveagreatdealofcredittoonemanforhavingpromotedseatravel,thatman______princeHenrythenavigato
Allanimalsmustrest,butdotheyreallysleepasweknowit?Theanswertothisquestionseemsobvious,Ifananimalregularl
Therearesomethatwouldarguethathospitalsarenoplacefordogs,whiletheyarewrong.Atleastaccordingtonewresearchr
Scholarsmaintainthatsocialdevelopmentcaneasily____languagechanges.
Canexercisebeabadthing?Suddendeathduringorsoonalterstrenuousexertiononthesquashcourtoronthearmytraininggr
He_____thejobbecauseitinvolvedtoomuchtraveling.
随机试题
患者,女,70岁。突发头痛,随即意识丧失呼之无反应。查体:血压24/15kPa,脉率60次/min,体温38℃;瞳孔3mm,双侧等大、等圆,对光反射迟钝,右侧肢体肌张力Ⅱ级,痛觉反射消失应用20%甘露醇静脉注射。患者的意识程度是
患者,43岁,因同房后出血半个月就诊,病理结果提示为宫颈癌Ial期。宜选择何种手术方式
我国轻工系统规定表面活性剂7天生物降解率必须大于
某运输机场的改扩建工程由国家投资,飞行区指标由4C升为4D。施工结束后,机场建设项目法人应当组织有关单位进行竣工验收,由于技术档案和施工管理资料不够完整,此次竣工验收没有通过。问题运输机场竣工验收的标准是什么?
2×16年1月1日,A商场店庆酬宾,开展一项奖励积分计划。该奖励积分计划规定:2×16年1月1日,客户每在商场内消费10元可兑换1个积分,每个积分可在未来购买产品时按1元的折扣兑现,有效期为3年。当日,共销售了100000元的产品,应授予客户可在未来购买
请根据以下教学片段,回答问题。(1)教师播放录音,学生听录音选取图片,听完后教师立即提取反馈,学生能够给出正确的选择。(2)教师再次播放录音,要求学生听录音补全对话。教师播放了一遍录音,没有留出学生填空的时间,而是开始提问学生两人一组朗读填
【2015年济南市真题】学校的法律地位是指学校作为法人或法律主体的地位,是学校()的统一体。
作为互联网革命的产物,网络文化已经成为______80后一代青年人的主流文化。我们这些印刷文化的过来人,对这一新崛起的网络文化,不管喜欢还是不喜欢,都______认真对待。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
三、根据下列资料,回答106—110题。2015年全国海洋生产总值64669亿元,比上年增长7.0%,海洋生产总值占国内生产总值的9.6%。其中,海洋第一产业增加值3292亿元,第二产业增加值27492亿元,第三产业增加值33885亿元。2
栈通常采用的两种存储结构是
最新回复
(
0
)