首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
admin
2013-02-14
38
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30%, i.e., car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division; Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in France; as the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers.
What was the result of businesses having surplus capacity?
选项
A、Many companies aimed to developing new vehicles.
B、Some companies re-launched old vehicles with new technology.
C、Some companies lose capacity by selling off parts of a business.
D、There came a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yF7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Accordingtotheman,whatdoesheneedtodothismorning?
Accordingtotheman,whatdoesheneedtodothismorning?
Whatdoesthecompanywanttodo?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatisthecompany’spriority?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatisthecompany’spriority?
Question询问
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
•YouwillheartheChairmanoftheBusinessBroadcastingCommitteeofatelevisioncompany.Heisaddressingameetingofthec
随机试题
通过证券交易所的证券交易,投资者持有或者通过协议、其他安排与他人共同持有一个上市公司已发行的有表决权股份达到30%时,继续进行收购的,应当依法向该上市公司所有股东发出收购上市公司全部或者部分股份的要约。()
Doyourealizethatyouhavemadeastatement?Holdtheglanceforasecondlonger,andyouhavemadeadifferentstatement.Hol
辩证思维方法“由抽象上升到具体”,是指()
健康足月女婴,7个月,体重7kg,母乳喂养,母亲突患急性乳腺炎,来门诊咨询。母亲询问正常小儿适宜的断奶时间为()
A.中药材B.中药饮片C.中成药D.血液制品(特殊适应症)E.果味制剂
F公司是一家专营进口高档家具的企业。媒体曝光该公司有部分家具是在国内生产后,以“先出口,再进口”的方式取得进口报关凭证,在销售时标注为外国原产,以高于出厂价数倍的价格销售。此时,已经在F公司购买家具的顾客,可以行使下列哪些权利?(2011年试卷一第65题)
实行会计电算化的单位,其会计账簿的登记、更正,应当符合国家统一的会计制度规定。()
党的十八届六中全会聚焦了全面从严治党的主题,并明确提出全面从严治党必须以加强和规范党内()作为起点和支点。
在唐德斯(F.C.Donders)的减法反应时实验中,A、B、C三种反应时分别代表简单反应时、选择反应时和辨别反应时,它们的关系为()
阅读以下说明,回答问题1至问题3,将解答填入答题纸对应的解答栏内。【说明】某企业在采用WindowsServer2003配置了共享打印、FTP和DHCP服务。FTP的配置如图3一2、图3一3所示。1.默认情况下,用户登录FTP服务器时,服务
最新回复
(
0
)