2. 考研
  3. Wilmut maintains that cloning animals has tremendous potential for helping people. Cloned Sheep, he says, could be used as livin

Wilmut maintains that cloning animals has tremendous potential for helping people. Cloned Sheep, he says, could be used as livin

admin2010-01-13  143
问题    Wilmut maintains that cloning animals has tremendous potential for helping people. Cloned Sheep, he says, could be used as living drug factories. Scientists could "engineer" sheep that produce drugs in their milk. And by altering the proteins on the surfaces of animal organs to make them more like human organs, scientists believe they may be able to create a plentiful source of organ donors for people.
   Why not clone humans as organ donors? Theoretically, Wilmut says, there is no reason his techniques couldn’t someday be used to clone people. Think about the possibilities: a whole basketball team of Michael Jordans, a scientific panel of Albert Einsteins, a movie starring and co-starring Brad Pitts.
   On a more serious note, some experts argue that couples who have difficulty having a baby could make copies of themselves. And parents whose child has a fatal disease like cancer might be able to clone the child, creating a twin who could be a bone-marrow (骨髓) donor.
   But even Ian Wilmut draws the line at cloning humans. "All of us would find that offensive," he says. Several countries, including Britain, Denmark, Germany and Australia, have made all scientific work on cloning humans illegal. The U.S. has no such law, but President Clinton has set up a panel of scientists and philosophers to study the issue. In the meantime, Clinton has imposed a ban on using federal money to clone humans.
   Humans are more than the sum of their genes, argues a philosopher at one research institute. Though they look exactly the same, clones are not necessarily exact copies. The younger twin might grow up with different influences—say, unusual friends or special teachers. A cloned Albert Einstein might fail his physics class. A cloned pop star might sing terribly.
   Say you were cloned. Would your twin live a shorter life because he or she started out with DNA that was already 10, 20 or 30 years old? Scientists aren’t sure. And how could you prevent someone from taking a sample of your hair and making a clone of you? Again, no solutions.
   What do you think? Should scientists be allowed to clone animals? How about humans?
A philosopher at one research institute argues that ______ .
选项 A、humans are no less the sum of their genes than the animals
B、genes cannot alone determine the life of human beings
C、humans are nothing but the sum of their genes
D、genes are the foundation of human lives
答案B
解析 第五段第一句指出：Humans are more than the sum of their genes, argues a philosopher at one research institute.意为：一个研究所的一位哲学家认为，人，不仅仅是基因的总和。由此可知哲学家的论点，故选B，其他选项均为干扰项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yNmi777K
0

在职申硕（同等学力）英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)