首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
admin
2015-10-21
100
问题
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avoiding the danger of a" scientific hierarchy" would be to see to it that every member of the general public was, as far as possible, scientifically educated. At the same time, scientists should be brought out of their isolation and encouraged to take a greater part in politics and administration.
As a general statement, I think most of us would agree with this, but I notice that, as usual, Mr. Cook does not define science, and merely implies in passing that it means certain exact sciences whose experiments can be made under laboratory conditions. Thus, adult education tends "to neglect scientific studies in favor of literary, economic and social subjects", economics and sociology not being regarded as branches of science, apparently. This point is of great importance. For the word science is at present used in at least two meanings, but the whole question of scientific education is obscured by the current tendency to dodge from one meaning to the other.
Science is generally taken as meaning either(a)the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc. ,or(b)a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to(b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say"science"they mean(a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, an astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician, is described as a"man of science" :no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology of their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. But a" scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist" ,in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so. Take one simple test—the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. There were plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb.
On the other hand, what happened to German literature when the Nazis came to power? I believe no exhaustive lists have been published, but I imagine that the number of German scientists—Jew apart—who voluntarily exiled themselves or were persecuted by the regime was much smaller than the number of writers and journalists. More sinister than this, a number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of "racial science".
But does this mean that the general public should not be more scientifically educated? On the contrary! All it means is that scientific education for the masses will do little good, and probably a lot of harm, if it simply boils down to more physics, more chemistry, more biology, etc. to the detriment of literature and history. Its probable effect on the average human being would be to narrow the range of his thoughts and make him more than ever contemptuous of such knowledge as he did not possess; and his political reactions would probably be somewhat less intelligent than those of an illiterate peasant who retained a few historical memories and a fairly sound aesthetic sense.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method—a method that can be used on any problem that one meets—and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the exact sciences, in other words—more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this.
An average person ignorant of history being compared with an illiterate farmer with historical memories is to show that______.
选项
A、in scientific education, the teaching of history shouldn’t be neglected
B、history is important for a person who wants to be outstanding
C、history is the most important subject in scientific education
D、in scientific education, more history courses should be provided
答案
A
解析
推断题。倒数第二段前三句指出,但是,这是否意味着,一般大众不应该接受更多的科学教育呢?恰恰相反!所有这一切意味着,如果科学教育仅仅落脚于削弱文学和历史而强化物理、化学、生物等,那么大众科学教育将会弊大于利。接下来进一步将没有历史知识的普通人和不识字的农民进行对比,其目的显然是为了说明前面的历史知识很重要,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yWKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
GovernmentsAreTryingA1990UnitedNationssurveyrevealedthatthemorehighlydevelopedcountriesspendanaverageof2t
WherewillBushhaveastopoverbeforehisvisittotheRussiancoastaltownSochi?
AndrewWright’sworkcoversthefollowingEXCEPT
DifferentTypesofLearningI.ThedefinitionoflearningA.AprocessofpeopleexperiencingrelationshipbetweeneventsB.【B1】
DifferentTypesofLearningI.ThedefinitionoflearningA.AprocessofpeopleexperiencingrelationshipbetweeneventsB.【B1】
Researchersinvestigatingbrainsizeandmentalabilitysaytheirworkoffersevidencethateducationprotectsthemindfromthe
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?Hashigh-speedInternetmadeyouimpatientwithslo
AndrewCarnegie,knownastheKingofSteel,builtthesteelindustryintheUnitedStates,and,intheprocess,becameoneof
Cigarettesleaveyouwithmorethanasmokyscentonyourclothesandfingernails.Anewstudyhasfoundevidencetobacco【M1】__
随机试题
《别粱锽》是一首()。
政府在国家经济建设中主要扮演着参与者的角色和()的角色。
既能治疗心痛、惊悸,又能治疗骨蒸盗汗的穴位是
某年轻女患者因患左侧乳腺癌住院行根治术。术中同时为右侧乳房一个不明显硬节也作了常规的冰冻病理切片,结果提示:右侧乳房小肿块部分癌变。此时,医生的最佳伦理选择是
A市甲会计师事务所(以下简称“甲所”)是特殊的普通合伙企业。20l8年年初,合伙人王某为了招揽业务向介绍案源者支付高额介绍费;A市财政局接到举报后对甲所予以警告,并责令其停业整顿。甲所不服,向人民法院提起诉讼;在诉讼期间,被告撤销了对甲所的处罚,甲所遂向人
下列行为中,会使得发行在外普通股股数增加,但不会改变所有者权益总额和内部结构的是()。
请阅读下列材料,并按要求作答。组成比例的四个数,叫做比例的项。两端的两项叫做比例的外项,中间的两项叫做比例的内项。两个外项的积是2.4×40=______,两个内项的积是1.6×60=______。如果把比例改成分数形式,等号两边的分子
A.K+外流B.Ca2+内流C.两者均有D.两者均无心室肌细胞动作电位平台期离子流有
Kate:Doyoumindopeningthedoorforme?Bob:______
ItisablazingmorninginthePermianbasin,inwestTexas,America’smostproductiveoilfield.Onthehighplainsariggnaws
最新回复
(
0
)