首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
admin
2015-10-21
37
问题
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avoiding the danger of a" scientific hierarchy" would be to see to it that every member of the general public was, as far as possible, scientifically educated. At the same time, scientists should be brought out of their isolation and encouraged to take a greater part in politics and administration.
As a general statement, I think most of us would agree with this, but I notice that, as usual, Mr. Cook does not define science, and merely implies in passing that it means certain exact sciences whose experiments can be made under laboratory conditions. Thus, adult education tends "to neglect scientific studies in favor of literary, economic and social subjects", economics and sociology not being regarded as branches of science, apparently. This point is of great importance. For the word science is at present used in at least two meanings, but the whole question of scientific education is obscured by the current tendency to dodge from one meaning to the other.
Science is generally taken as meaning either(a)the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc. ,or(b)a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to(b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say"science"they mean(a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, an astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician, is described as a"man of science" :no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology of their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. But a" scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist" ,in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so. Take one simple test—the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. There were plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb.
On the other hand, what happened to German literature when the Nazis came to power? I believe no exhaustive lists have been published, but I imagine that the number of German scientists—Jew apart—who voluntarily exiled themselves or were persecuted by the regime was much smaller than the number of writers and journalists. More sinister than this, a number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of "racial science".
But does this mean that the general public should not be more scientifically educated? On the contrary! All it means is that scientific education for the masses will do little good, and probably a lot of harm, if it simply boils down to more physics, more chemistry, more biology, etc. to the detriment of literature and history. Its probable effect on the average human being would be to narrow the range of his thoughts and make him more than ever contemptuous of such knowledge as he did not possess; and his political reactions would probably be somewhat less intelligent than those of an illiterate peasant who retained a few historical memories and a fairly sound aesthetic sense.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method—a method that can be used on any problem that one meets—and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the exact sciences, in other words—more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this.
An average person ignorant of history being compared with an illiterate farmer with historical memories is to show that______.
选项
A、in scientific education, the teaching of history shouldn’t be neglected
B、history is important for a person who wants to be outstanding
C、history is the most important subject in scientific education
D、in scientific education, more history courses should be provided
答案
A
解析
推断题。倒数第二段前三句指出,但是,这是否意味着,一般大众不应该接受更多的科学教育呢?恰恰相反!所有这一切意味着,如果科学教育仅仅落脚于削弱文学和历史而强化物理、化学、生物等,那么大众科学教育将会弊大于利。接下来进一步将没有历史知识的普通人和不识字的农民进行对比,其目的显然是为了说明前面的历史知识很重要,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yWKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Toreducespammails,whichofthefollowingisNOTsuggestedbyDavid?
DifferentTypesofLearningI.ThedefinitionoflearningA.AprocessofpeopleexperiencingrelationshipbetweeneventsB.【B1】
DifferentTypesofLearningI.ThedefinitionoflearningA.AprocessofpeopleexperiencingrelationshipbetweeneventsB.【B1】
HowtoStudyEnglishinYourDream:theTheoryI.IntroductionA.ConnectionsamongEnglishstudy,imaginationanddreamB.Two
HowtoStudyEnglishinYourDream:theTheoryI.IntroductionA.ConnectionsamongEnglishstudy,imaginationanddreamB.Two
HowtoStudyEnglishinYourDream:theTheoryI.IntroductionA.ConnectionsamongEnglishstudy,imaginationanddreamB.Two
LosAngelescabinet-makerEdwardStewartmaybeamodernDr.Frankenstein.In1959,heclaims,herestoredadeadfriendtolife
AzharUsman,astand-upcomic,saysheisa"verypatriotic"AmericanMuslim."Iwoulddieforthiscountry,"hedeclares.After
AzharUsman,astand-upcomic,saysheisa"verypatriotic"AmericanMuslim."Iwoulddieforthiscountry,"hedeclares.After
Thatexperienceinfluencessubsequentbehaviorisevidenceofanobviousbutneverthelessremarkableactivitycalled"rememberi
随机试题
A.开髓引流B.开髓封失活剂C.开髓拔髓开放D.麻醉拔髓+根管封药E.开髓开放+切开引流以下疾病的首诊处理为:急性根尖炎
A.亚硫酸氢钠B.苯甲酸钠C.葡萄糖D.枸橼酸钠E.三氯叔丁醇在注射剂中可作为止痛剂的是
某住宅楼共120户,若每户按4人计,生活用水定额取200L/(人.d),小时变化系数为2.5,用水时间为24h,每户设置的卫生器具当量数为8,则最大用水时卫生器具给水当量平均出流概率U0为()。
股票指数期货合约的价值是股票指数与每点指数所代表的金额的乘积。()
全面风险管理是一种以先进的风险管理理念为指导的新型管理模式,其体现了()。
贫血是常见的营养性疾病之一,缺铁性贫血在我国也是婴幼儿、青少年和妇女普遍存在的问题。现在需要对某山区的贫困县进行膳食习惯和缺铁性贫血之间关系的调查,请根据上述情境回答以下问题:该方法的应用原则是什么?
下列关于社会工作领域的说法中,正确的是()。
幼儿早教是促进儿童发展的一项具体内容,那么适用于幼儿早教的方法主要有()。
在垄断市场的长期中,垄断企业可以通过调节________来实现利润最大化。
Therewillbeaninternationalconferencenextmonth.Thesecretarysayswe’11havetosetofftomorrow.Infact,______.
最新回复
(
0
)