首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
admin
2015-10-21
46
问题
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avoiding the danger of a" scientific hierarchy" would be to see to it that every member of the general public was, as far as possible, scientifically educated. At the same time, scientists should be brought out of their isolation and encouraged to take a greater part in politics and administration.
As a general statement, I think most of us would agree with this, but I notice that, as usual, Mr. Cook does not define science, and merely implies in passing that it means certain exact sciences whose experiments can be made under laboratory conditions. Thus, adult education tends "to neglect scientific studies in favor of literary, economic and social subjects", economics and sociology not being regarded as branches of science, apparently. This point is of great importance. For the word science is at present used in at least two meanings, but the whole question of scientific education is obscured by the current tendency to dodge from one meaning to the other.
Science is generally taken as meaning either(a)the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc. ,or(b)a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to(b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say"science"they mean(a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, an astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician, is described as a"man of science" :no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology of their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. But a" scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist" ,in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so. Take one simple test—the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. There were plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb.
On the other hand, what happened to German literature when the Nazis came to power? I believe no exhaustive lists have been published, but I imagine that the number of German scientists—Jew apart—who voluntarily exiled themselves or were persecuted by the regime was much smaller than the number of writers and journalists. More sinister than this, a number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of "racial science".
But does this mean that the general public should not be more scientifically educated? On the contrary! All it means is that scientific education for the masses will do little good, and probably a lot of harm, if it simply boils down to more physics, more chemistry, more biology, etc. to the detriment of literature and history. Its probable effect on the average human being would be to narrow the range of his thoughts and make him more than ever contemptuous of such knowledge as he did not possess; and his political reactions would probably be somewhat less intelligent than those of an illiterate peasant who retained a few historical memories and a fairly sound aesthetic sense.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method—a method that can be used on any problem that one meets—and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the exact sciences, in other words—more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this.
An average person ignorant of history being compared with an illiterate farmer with historical memories is to show that______.
选项
A、in scientific education, the teaching of history shouldn’t be neglected
B、history is important for a person who wants to be outstanding
C、history is the most important subject in scientific education
D、in scientific education, more history courses should be provided
答案
A
解析
推断题。倒数第二段前三句指出,但是,这是否意味着,一般大众不应该接受更多的科学教育呢?恰恰相反!所有这一切意味着,如果科学教育仅仅落脚于削弱文学和历史而强化物理、化学、生物等,那么大众科学教育将会弊大于利。接下来进一步将没有历史知识的普通人和不识字的农民进行对比,其目的显然是为了说明前面的历史知识很重要,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yWKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheAmericanWay:FreedomTheheartoftheAmericancalendarisJuly【4】Americanshavecelebratedthisdateas"Independence
HowtoBeanExpertI.BackgroundinformationaboutthespeakerA.BeinganexpertinanthropologyhimselfB.Startingconsider
ThecityofLondonis【N1】______foraseriesofeventstocelebratetheChineseNewYear,andiflastyear’scelebrationsarean
______istheauthorofScarletLetter.
HowtoStudyEnglishinYourDream:theTheoryI.IntroductionA.ConnectionsamongEnglishstudy,imaginationanddreamB.Two
Inwritingthepoem"TheRiver-Merchant’swife:Aletter",Poundtookitsmaterialfromtheancient______poetry.
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?Hashigh-speedInternetmadeyouimpatientwithslo
AzharUsman,astand-upcomic,saysheisa"verypatriotic"AmericanMuslim."Iwoulddieforthiscountry,"hedeclares.After
Cigarettesleaveyouwithmorethanasmokyscentonyourclothesandfingernails.Anewstudyhasfoundevidencetobacco【M1】__
Thatexperienceinfluencessubsequentbehaviorisevidenceofanobviousbutneverthelessremarkableactivitycalled"rememberi
随机试题
根据我国《专利法》,申请专利的发明创造在申请日之前6个月内具有下列情况之一的不丧失新颖性,这些情况包括()
下列由慢性肾衰竭引起的肾性骨病中,最常见的是
以下颌支、下颌角为中心的肿胀、充血、压痛是何间隙感染的表现
男,25岁,突感上腹部剧痛。检查:血压130/80mmHg,脉搏110队/分,板样腹,肠鸣音消失。血红蛋白120g/L,血白细胞数8.0×109/L。首先应采取的检查是
1岁小儿结核菌素试验阳性,可以推测患儿()
利用燃烧或电能,把加热到熔化或接近熔化状态的金属微粒,喷附在金属制品表面上而形成保护层的一种方法称为()镀。
群体决策支持系统按照决策时间和群体成员地理上的邻近程度可分为决策室、局域决策网、电子会议、远程决策四种应用类型。下列有关四种应用类型特征的描述正确的有()。
政治社团,指的是在社会政治生活中,按照特定的利益集合在一起,有组织地参与、影响政府政策制定、变动和执行过程的社会团体。下列不属于政治社团的一项是()。
给定资料1.A市南部两个乡镇为招商引资,和一家畜牧企业签订了投资协议书,并和农民签订了上千亩的土地征用合同,用来创办生猪养殖基地及配套设施等。然而,2018年这家畜牧企业经营跟不上,无力支付土地租赁租金,表层土壤还遭到了破坏。村民张海村说,早知道
简述资本结构信号理论的主要内容。
最新回复
(
0
)