首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Unlike the situation with hurricanes, tornadoes, or floods, there are no storm clouds or rising river levels to foretell an eart
Unlike the situation with hurricanes, tornadoes, or floods, there are no storm clouds or rising river levels to foretell an eart
admin
2010-03-25
69
问题
Unlike the situation with hurricanes, tornadoes, or floods, there are no storm clouds or rising river levels to foretell an earthquake. Because they hit without advance warning, earthquakes are particularly terrifying. When earthquakes strike, they can cause massive human casualties and large amounts of damage. The January 1994 earthquake in Northridge, California, killed 57 people and injured almost 12,000 others while causing more than $ 25 billion in damages. But these numbers pale in comparison to what happened in Kobe, Japan, one year later. The Great Hanshin Earthquake there killed more than 5,000 people, left more than 300,000 homeless, and resulted in more than $ 300 billion in damages.
Because earthquakes have the potential to greatly impact society, the US government embarked on an ambitious programme in the 1970s to develop methods for predicting earthquakes. The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Programme sought to develop technologies that would allow for earthquake prediction on time scales of hours to days. Such predictions would not necessarily lead to reduced damage, but the hope was that they could reduce injuries and the loss of life suffered in a large quake. Scientists were optimistic in the beginning, in part due to a number of apparent successes in anticipating some earthquakes in the United States and China. However, earthquake prediction has proved more difficult than expected.
One method of earthquake prediction involves studying the geologic history and noting when previous quakes have occurred. One study of a particular segment of the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, noted that it had experienced four earthquakes over the previous 100 years at intervals of roughly 22 years. Based on this information, scientists predicted in 1984 that the area had a 95 percent likelihood of experiencing a moderate earthquake sometime between 1985 and 1993. As part of the Parkfield experiment, steps were taken to prepare for the expected event, including the development of warning strategies and studies of public response.
Through November 1998, however, no earthquake had occurred in Parkfield, leading many people to conclude that the experiment had been a failure. Joanne Nigg, a sociologist who has studied the Parkfield experiment, concluded that the project was at least somewhat successful in forging links between scientific procedures and policy concerns. Much was learned about publicly issuing earthquake predictions; in particular, that earthquake predictions themselves have important impacts on society. If an earthquake does occur in Parkfield, scientists will be prepared with a dense network of scientific instruments to record the quake and improve knowledge about how and why earthquakes occur.
From the perspective of the late 1990s, it is evident that expecting timely and accurate earthquake predictions was too ambitious. In the mid-1980s the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Programme reported to the US Congress that earthquake prediction was more problematic than had been anticipated. Today scientists are more focused on developing improved estimates of long-term earthquake probabilities, measured in decades or centuries.
The programme is also working on early warning systems that detect ground motion after an earthquake has started. This information can be used to warn people farther from the epicenter (the point where the earthquake originates). The goal is to create early warning systems to notify people that a large earthquake has begun, from a few seconds to minutes in advance. This warning could allow some useful actions, such as shutting down or backing up systems in a nuclear power plant. In the early 1990s this type of warning system provided Mexico City about 75 seconds of notice that an earthquake had occurred off the coast.
After the Parkfield programme, experts concluded that earthquake prediction in terms of days and years was
选项
A、chancy.
B、hopeful.
C、unrealistic.
D、difficult.
答案
C
解析
在Parkfield项目开始前,科学家对此很有信心。但是事实上,预报没有成功。因此,到了90年代,人们对于短期预报地震的准确率已有不同看法。原文用了“too ambitious”,相比而言,C(unrealistic)较准确地反映了这种态度。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ymqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Pleasedrawaneatline.B、Goheadifyouhaveenvelopes.C、Areyoureadytogo?D、Canyouexplainwhyyoulie?B
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualisminclude:"Doyourownthing.""Ididitmyway."
Confidenceismorethananattitude.Itcomesfromknowingexactlywhereyouaregoingandexactlyhowyouaregoingtogetther
Allherlife,MrsFosterhadhadanalmostpathologicalfearofmissingatrain,aplane,aboat,orevenatheatercurtain.In
Goodafternoon,folks.Today’sdiscussiontopicis"OnlineShopping".Withonlytwoweekstogo【C1】______,buyingpresentsisa
Walkingistheexerciseofchoiceformostdieters.Nowonder.Youdon’tneedagymmembership.Youcandoitvirtuallyeverywhe
A、TheysendthemessagetothePresidentwithintendays.B、Theyofficiallystatereasonsforrejectingthemessage.C、Theymeet
Canoneimposeanoccupationupononeselforone’spartnerwhennopositiveinterestinthisoccupationisdisplayed?Canoneco
Thename"QueenVictoria"【1】_____upapictureofasmall,plumpoldlady.Itishardto
A、cautiouspredictions.B、impartialjudgment.C、carefulcalculation.D、simplestatistics.D
随机试题
声门裂位于()
女性盆底功能障碍性疾病
下列组合,正确的是
对乙酰氨基酚贮藏不当可产生的毒性水解产物是
下列关于合同债务免除的说法正确的是()。
【2020年真题】氯化钠水溶液电解生产氯气、氢氧化钠、氢气,属于典型的化工工艺,在电解过程中要对电解槽温度、压力、液位、流量采取报警和联锁,实现安全控制。下列氯化钠水溶液电解过程的技术措施中,不属于安全控制措施的是()。
房地产价格与房地产()成负相关。
关于行政法的特征说法错误的是()。
政府考虑以两种方式补贴低收入家庭。一种是实物性补贴(如食品补贴),另一种是现金补助。请画图回答以下问题:(1)请表明如果两种方式耗赞相同的财政收入,被补贴的人一般喜欢第二种方式的补助;(2)假设两种方式都耗费相同的财政收入,请解释在什么
个别行业公私合营阶段,对企业利润的分配实行
最新回复
(
0
)