首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2013-01-12
70
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly: all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story.) In each case investors------mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans------all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis: a banking crisis because on bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries’ split difference------and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most clichés, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the fight track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong: now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right The IMF points to Korea’s recovery------and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all-----a s proof that its policy recommendations were right Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia------which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls------also seems to be on the mend. Malaysia’s prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news------even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform------whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no mere money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner, at worst, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
It can be inferred from the passage that IMF policy recommendations______.
选项
A、were far from a panacea in all cases
B、were feasible in their recipient countries
C、failed to word in their recipient countries
D、were rejected unanimously by Asian countries
答案
A
解析
关于国际货币基金组织的经济复苏政策,文章的第四段从多方面进行论述,该政策对韩国经济的复苏产生了一定的作用,但同时指出“Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse.”接着以没有接受IMF帮助的马来西亚为例说明,IMF的经济复苏政策并不是万能的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/zC9O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Someweeksago,ridinginacabfromBostontoCambridge,mydriverturnedandaskedmewhatIdidforaliving."TeachEnglish,
AlthoughAlicehadexpectedherparentstobeworriedbyherlong,unexplainedabsence,bothhermotherandfatherseemedquite
Theprofessorstoppedforadrinkandthen______withhislectureontheIndianculture.
InhistypicallyAmericanopenstyleofcommunication,Mr.HayesconfrontedIsabetaaboutnotlookingathim.Reluctantly,shee
Theoutcryagainstthecorporation’spolicieswill______onlyifacompromiseisreachedintheassembly.
Inthesearchforsolutiontoseeminglyoverwhelmingproblems,itbecameincreasingly______toincluderadical,evenrevolution
Justiceinsocietymustincludebothafairtrialtotheaccusedandtheselectionofanappropriatepunishmentforthoseproven
Groomingandpersonalhygienehavebeenaroundforages.It’shardtoimagineatimewhenpeopleweren’tconcernedwithtakingc
Baroquehasbeenthetermusedbyarthistoriansforalmostacenturytothedominantstyleoftheperiod600~750.
随机试题
脂肪的主要生理功能是
工期优化一般通过压缩关键工作的持续时间来达到优化目标。在优化过程中,下列说法正确的是()。
《会计法》规定,对单位直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员可以处2000元以上20000元以上罚款的行为有()。
(2018·山东)“榜样学习”可以对学生起到较好的教育效果。下列理论可以给出合理解释的是()
代位继承是指被继承人的子女先于被继承人死亡时,由被继承人的死亡子女的晚辈直系血亲继承其应继承的遗产份额的制度。根据定义,下列属于代位继承的是()。
对于史上最严交通规则主要针对开车的人.有人说行人也该罚,你怎么看?
危机公关是指由于企业管理不善、同行业竞争甚至遭遇恶意破坏或者是外界特殊事件的影响,而给企业或者品牌带来危机,企业针对危机所采取的一系列自救行为,包括消除影响、恢复形象等。根据上述定义,下列属于危机公关的是()。
下列关于栈的叙述中,正确的是()。
Itishardtotrackthebluewhale,theocean’slargestcreature,whichhasalmostbeenkilledoffbycommercialwhalingandis
Ifyouareastudentwithbadcreditoralowcreditscore,nothavingacreditcardcanbefrustrating.【D1】______,youcanincr
最新回复
(
0
)