首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
If you’ve ever been on a jury, you might have noticed that a funny thing happens the minute you get behind closed doors. Everybo
If you’ve ever been on a jury, you might have noticed that a funny thing happens the minute you get behind closed doors. Everybo
admin
2019-06-20
54
问题
If you’ve ever been on a jury, you might have noticed that a funny thing happens the minute you get behind closed doors. Everybody starts talking about themselves. They say what they would have done if they had been the plaintiff or the defendant. They bring up anecdote after anecdote. It can take hours to get back to the points of law that the judge has instructed you to consider.
Being on a jury reminds me why I can’t stomach talk radio. We Americans seem to have lost the ability to talk about anything but our own experiences. We can’t seem to generalize without stereotyping or to consider evidence that goes against our own experience.
I heard a doctor on a radio show the other day talking about a study that found that exercise reduces the incidence of Alzheimer’s. And caller after caller couldn’t wait to make essentially the opposite point: " Well, my grandmother never exercised and she lived to 95, sharp as a tack. " We are in an age summed up by the aphorism: " I experience, therefore I’m right.
This isn’t a new phenomenon, except by degree. Historically, the hallmarks of an uneducated person were the lack of ability to think critically, to use deductive reasoning to distinguish the personal from the universal. Now that seems an apt description of many Americans. The culture of "I" is everywhere you look, from the iPod/iPhone/iPad to the fact that memoir is the fastest growing literary genre.
How’d we get here? The same way we seem to get everywhere today: the Internet. The Internet has allowed us to segregate ourselves based on our interests. All cat lovers over here. All people who believe President Obama wasn’t born in the United States over there. For many of us, what we believe has become the most important organizing element in our lives. Once we all had common media experiences: Walter Cronkite, Ed Sullivan, a large daily newspaper. Now each of us can create a personal media network—call it the iNetwork— fed by the RSS feeds of our choosing.
But the Internet doesn’t just cordon us off in our own little pods. It also makes us dumber, as Nicholas Carr points out in his excellent book, " The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. " He argues that the way we consume media changes our brains, not just our behavior. The Internet rewards shallow thinking: One search leads to thousands of results that skim over the surface of a subject.
Of course, we could dive deeply into any one of the listings, but we don’t. Studies show that people skim online, they don’t read. The experience has been designed to reward speed and variety, not depth. And there is tangible evidence, based on studies of brain scans, that the medium is changing our physical brains, strengthening the synapses and areas used for referential thinking while weakening the areas used for critical thinking.
And when we diminish our ability to think critically, we, in essence, become less educated, less capable of reflection and meaningful conversation. Our experience, reinforced by a web of other gut instincts and experiences that match our own, becomes evidence. Case in point; the polarization of our politics. Exhibit A: the debt ceiling impasse.
Ironically, the same medium that helped mobilize people in the Arab world this spring is helping create a more rigid, dysfunctional democracy here: one that’s increasingly polarized, where each side is isolated and capable only of sound bites that skim the surface, a culture where deep reasoning and critical thinking aren’t rewarded.
The challenge for most of us isn’t to go backwards: We can’t disconnect from the Internet. Nor would we want to. But we can work harder to make "search" the metaphor it once was; to discover, not just to skim. The Internet lets us find facts in an instant. But it doesn’t stop us from finding insights, if we are willing to really search.
Please explain "I" culture. (4 points)
选项
答案
It refers an atmosphere in which people are indulged in an arbitrary empiricism.
解析
事实细节题。开篇以参加陪审团为例,描述了人们交谈的场景,并由此指出,美国人似乎一说话就必会提到自己的经验,随后又以事例加以证明。以自己的经验来以偏概全,忽视批判性思维,这是目前美国人的一种文化倾向。可见所谓的I culture就是一种人们沉溺于武断的个人经验主义的氛围。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/zDra777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Thetransformational一generativegrammarwasputforwardby________.
OfallthecatastrophesthatcouldbefallAmericaincomingyears,abigterroristattack,perhapsevenbiggerthanthoseonSep
Overall,itisgoingtobecomemucheasierforpeopletocommunicate______theNetCommunicatingwithothersinrealtimewill
Thiscollectionofshortstoriesissaid______intoatleastfiveforeignlanguagesintheyearstocome.
Asmyfatherisnot______withthelanguage,hehasaskedmetoassumetheroleofprivatesecretaryandmeetyouonhisbehalf
Theevolutionofintelligenceamongearlylargemammalsofthegrasslandswasdueingreatmeasuretotheinteractionbetweentw
It’snothingnewthatEnglishuseisontherisearoundtheworld,especiallyinbusinesscircles.ThisalsohappensinFrance,
Weattempttotakealanguageaparttoseehowitworks.Whenwestudyhowlanguageworks,wefinditisextraordinarilycomplex
Itwasimpoliteforyoutoleavewithoutsayinggoodbye;youreally______havedoneso.
Who______wascomingtoseemeinmyofficethisafternoon?
随机试题
水喷雾系统是通过水雾喷头使水从连续的洒水状态转变成不连续的细小水雾滴而喷射出来,其灭火机理主要是()等作用。
“他在教室看书呢”中“在”是动词。()
背景资料:某机电安装公司通过招标承担了某小区采暖锅炉及辅助设备安装工程,在进行分项工程质量验收时,有下列事件发生:事件一:锅炉本体已安装完毕,但钢骨架因施工过程中保护不够造成局部垂直度超差;事件二:与锅炉本体连接的主干管上,发现有一
自动喷水灭火系统具有()的特点。
国家规定有数量限制的进口货物实行()管理。
假设证券组合P由两个证券组合I和Ⅱ构成,组合Ⅰ的期望收益水平和总风险水平都比Ⅱ的高,并且证券组合Ⅰ和Ⅱ在P中的投资比重分别为0.48和0.52,那么()
下列说法中,()是正确的。
胡克定律
世界经济全球化时期的特点有( )
低冲击力的
最新回复
(
0
)