首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
From getting into a taxi to asking a fellow train passenger to keep an eye on your luggage while buying a coffee, we’ve all put
From getting into a taxi to asking a fellow train passenger to keep an eye on your luggage while buying a coffee, we’ve all put
admin
2020-11-04
53
问题
From getting into a taxi to asking a fellow train passenger to keep an eye on your luggage while buying a coffee, we’ve all put our trust in those we do not know. Now researchers have revealed that strangers are more likely to be trusted if they look like someone who has earned your trust before—and more likely to be distrusted if they resemble someone who has betrayed your faith in them.
While previous research has shown how people can learn whether others are trustworthy over time, the team say it was unclear how an initial judgment is made about whether to trust or cooperate with someone. "What we wanted to figure out was what happens when you come across somebody for the first time," said Dr. Oriel FeldmanHall, co-author of the research and a social neuroscientist from Brown University.
A team of researchers in the US reveal how they asked 29 participants to either keep $10 or invest all— or part—of it with one of three men they did not know but whose photographs they were shown. The team then carried out a second experiment in which participants were asked to pick a partner for a new game: either a player whose face they couldn’t see, or a player whose face they were shown in a photograph.
The results reveal that the more a possible player looked like the trusted individual from the previous game, the more likely participants were to select them as their partner for the next task, while an even stronger negative effect was found for those who resembled the untrustworthy man in the initial game. Just over 68% of participants turned down the pictured player if he bore any resemblance to the untrustworthy man.
FeldmanHall noted the findings are similar to the seminal (开创性的) experiments in which Russian scientist Ivan Petrovich Pavlov’s dogs learned to associate the sound of a certain bell with food. "If Pavlov would ring a similar type of bell, the dog would also salivate—it would just salivate a little bit less," said FeldmanHall.
The team then carried out the same experiments with 28 new participants, while fMRI brain scanning took place. Among their findings, the team discovered that as the image of the potential candidate was tweaked to look more like the untrustworthy player of the initial game, activity in the amygdala (杏仁体) — an area of the brain linked to processing threat—became stronger.
Antonio Espin, a behavioural economist from Middlesex University, London, said the study’s implications could be wide-ranging. "Interestingly, since the main reason for facial similarity is shared genes, the study not only advances our understanding of why we trust or distrust specific strangers but also has broader implications, for example, for ethnic or racial discrimination and in the evolutionary arena of partner selection. "
According to the researchers, what could be the prominent feature of the new study?
选项
A、It revealed the time needed to win trust.
B、It focused on the very initial establishment of trust.
C、It noticed participants’ response to stimulation.
D、It made a novel design for the experiment procedure.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。本题考查新研究的突出特点。定位段通过将新研究与以往的研究进行比较,说明其特点。作者指出,以往的研究表明了人们是如何通过一段时间的了解确定其他人是否可信,但研究小组称,对于是否信任某个人并与之合作的最初判断是如何做出的,这一点尚不明确。由此推断,新研究的研究对象是陌生人,主要研究信任最初建立的基础,故答案为B)。A)“它揭示了赢得信任所需的时间”,根据原文,这与以往研究有关,不是新研究的特点,故排除;C)“它注意到参与者对刺激的反应”和D)“它对实验步骤进行了创新设计”在定位段中都没有提及,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ztP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、ChildreninCaliforniaarenotlikelytolearncreativegeography.B、ChildreninprivateschoolsrunbyJapanesearesmarter.
A、Anancientbuilding.B、Aworldofantiques.C、AnEgyptianmuseum.D、AnEgyptianMemorial.A
Who’sReallyAddictingYoutoTechnology?[A]"NearlyeveryoneIknowisaddictedinsomemeasuretotheInternet,"wroteTonyS
Let’sallstopjudgingpeoplewhotalktothemselves.Newresearchsaysthatthosewhocan’tseemtokeeptheirinnermonologues
A、Lastweek.B、Threeweeksago.C、Twomonthsago.D、Threeyearsago.B由选项可知,此题考查时问。录音详细说明了购物中心的情况:花费三年打造,终于在三个星期前正式营业,比预期晚了两个月,故
A、Encouragingotherstofollowhiswrong-doingB、Stealingendangeredanimalsfromthezoo.C、Organisingpeopleagainsttheautho
A、Aplatewithwater.B、Aplatewithfood.C、Adirtyplate.D、Acleanplate.D选项均涉及盘子,预测题目应该跟餐饮有关。讲座最后聊到餐饮习俗:与埃及和中国不同,美国人认为你把盘里的
Tsunamis[A]UpuntilDecemberof2004,thephenomenonoftsunamiwasnotonthemindsofmostoftheworld’spopulation.Tha
A、Theyhelppeoplegetlegalshelters.B、Theycontinuethecycleofhomelessness.C、Theyforcethehomelesstosupportthemselve
随机试题
疏散通道上防火卷帘所在防火分区内任意两个独立的感烟火灾探测器或一个专用于联动防火卷帘的感烟火灾探测器的报警信号触发联动模块,由防火卷帘控制器联动控制防火卷帘下降至距地(楼)面()m处停止;再触发一个专用于联动防火卷帘的感温火灾探测器联动
有关家庭病床的描述,错误的是
卫生费用的评价指标包括
血液不回流至门静脉的器官是()
请选择最适合的一项填入问号处,使之符合整个图形的变化规律。
若正项级数收敛,则().
在项目管理工作中,项目管理师认识到,如果只有领导能力而没有管理能力或只有管理能力而没有领导能力,都可能带来不好的结果。在以下这些能力中()最能代表项目管理师的领导才能。
下列定义变量的语句中错误的是
以下是宏m的操作序列设计:条件操作序列操作参数MsgBox消息为“AA”[tt]>1MsgBox消息为“BB”…MsgBox消息为“CC”
Dad,WhyDidYouDoIt?EverytimethephoneringsinmyfiatIjump,especiallyifit’snearmidnight.DeepdownIknowit’
最新回复
(
0
)