首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to Get a Paper Published I . Prerequisite doing mass【B1】______【B1】______ collecting mass information and data II. Things y
How to Get a Paper Published I . Prerequisite doing mass【B1】______【B1】______ collecting mass information and data II. Things y
admin
2015-06-14
29
问题
How to Get a Paper Published
I . Prerequisite
doing mass【B1】______【B1】______
collecting mass information and data
II. Things you should do after the submission of your paper
A. If you do not get an acknowledgement
post【B2】______【B2】______
B. When not informed of a review decision for long
write to the editor in a(n)【B3】______way【B3】______
III . Advisable【B4】______to the editor in different situations【B4】______
A. If the paper is rejected with good reasons
accept and learn from the experience
B. If you view the rejection as【B5】______【B5】______
make a protest supported by strong evidence and good reasons
C. When confronted with the editor’s constructive advice
consider【B6】______and attempt to revise【B6】______
D. When sending back the revised manuscript
write a general【B7】______:【B7】______
thank for his effort and comments
promise comments considered
reproduce the editor’s review aligned with the reply:
remind the editor
show him your【B8】______【B8】______
offer a good reason for suggestions not followed
try to【B9】______the reviewer rather than fight with him【B9】______
IV. Other warnings and advice
attach importance to established【B10】______of academia【B10】______
avoid overemphasizing quantity of papers
【B2】
How to Get a Paper Published
Good morning, everyone! As college students, all of you. I believe, have the capacities to do researches by your own, and also have the basic knowledge of writing research papers. But do you know how to make your paper published? Today, I’m going to give you a lecture on this.
(1)First of all, you should write your papers well on the basis of doing mass researches and collecting mass information and data. It’s the prerequisite. Then, please focus your minds on the following tips. After you have followed all the advice on how to write a paper, had it submitted to a journal of your choice, here are things you should do.
(2)First, if the editor and the journal are established and responsible, you should receive an acknowledgement within two weeks. Otherwise, you should post an inquiry. Manuscripts do get lost at times.
Then, once receipt is acknowledged you should wait patiently for a review decision.(3)I personally suggest that if you have not heard from the journal in four months, then you should politely write to the editor to inquire about progress on the review, since occasionally there arc irresponsible editors and reviewers. Once they agreed to process your paper, they owe you some timely response. But be polite and professional in your dealings. Remember reviewing a manuscript is a volunteer activity. As authors, "demanding" actions will get you nowhere.
Finally, the reply comes back from the editor. If the editor accepts the paper without modification or with request for minor revisions only, congratulations!
More likely than not, however, the paper is not accepted as is and the editor wants major revisions and re-review : or worse, the paper is rejected.(4)In either case, you have some decisions to make. Here I offer my own experience on what to do next.
If the paper is rejected outright, then you need to decide if the decision is justified. Most of the time, this is done with good reason including value judgment. The author should accept and learn from the experience.(5)On the rare occasion when you think a real injustice has been committed and you want to protest, you had better do it with very strong evidence and well supported reasons. Furthermore, if you balance your action a-gainst the cost of protest some times you will realize it is not worth the trouble. For almost everyone, you will only have truly significant discovery a couple of times in your entire life. No one said the world is fair and most of the time, it is not worthwhile to get angry with the "small stuff".
(6)Most reviewers are fair and have constructive things to say which you should consider carefully when attempting to revise your paper. Try not to get annoyed by the sometimes sarcastic remarks of the reviewer. Often it is their chance to payback when they were on the receiving end as authors. Thus, don’t be sarcastic and mean in responding to their reviews. Getting angry will only hurt your cause. As the saying goes "don’t get mad, get even by having your paper accepted".
When responding to a reviewer with your revised manuscript and/or specific replies, remember that months probably has gone past since the reviewer read your paper and wrote his review. Make the job easy and pleasant for him.(7)First, write a general covering letter to each reviewer thanking him for his effort and comments. Then promise that you have considered each of his comments and what you have done and responded to each. Then, reproduce his review and give your reply side by side for each remark. Remember, by this time most reviewer probably has forgotten what he said about your paper. You need to make things easy and to remind him.(8)Also showing you took his comments seriously will impress him with your effort and sincerity.
But you need not agree with everything the reviewer said. If you must disagree, do it professionally and with no discomfort. Above all, explain why you cannot do what he suggests with a good reason. Fair referees and editors will respect you.
(9)Above all, remember your task is to win over the reviewer and not to fight with him. The playing field between a reviewer and an author is not level. You can seldom win a fight with an editor or a reviewer.
(10)In addition to dealing with the relationship with an editor or a reviewer, another thing I need to remind you is that though currently quantity of publication is all important, conforming to established custom and traditions of academia is of great significance. The emphasis on quantity will soon pass and you will regret if you give in to some incentives for aberrant and unethical behavior. Therefore, I want to say that you should put correct eyes on the publishing of papers. Never copy anybody’s work!
Well, in summary, when you contact a reviewer, remember to be patient and professional to him, learn from the experience rather than get annoyed if the paper is rejected, and furthermore, do something to remind a reviewer when you send to him your revised manuscript. If you follow my advice, chances are that you will have your paper published. OK, today’s lecture is over. Thank you very much!
选项
答案
an inquiry
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/zuOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
WhichofthefollowingsportswasNOTinventedinBritain?
ReviewingthedecadethatfollowedWorldWarn,Cartwrightspeaksofthe"excitementandoptimism"ofAmericansocialpsycholo
______isthenationalanthemoftheUnitedStates.
ThedecisionofestablishingtheUnitedNationswasmadeat
Evenahalf-heartedonlookercannothelpbutrealizethatinthisfast-pacedworld,mostaspectsofpopularcultureareconstan
TheToriesweretheforerunnersof______,whichstillbearsthisnicknametoday.
ImprovingYourMotivationforLearningEnglishI.TheimportanceofthetechniquesforimprovingmotivationA.Necessityforle
北京的道旁多植槐树,当槐花桂满枝头香飘回逸的时候,夏日就带着炎热与浓绿向人们涌来了。清晨,骑上自行车,加入上班的“洪流”,眼前闪动的是人们五颜六色的夏服,而八月盛夏,最高气温达到三十七、八度时.不少姑娘穿起露肩、低胸、无袖的上衣,有的小伙子把背心捋
Recently,Ihaveheardtwostoriesregardingtheautomobilesector.ThesalesofaSino-USjointventurehaveincreasedsignific
随机试题
A.高位结扎及剥脱术B.旁路转流术C.切开取栓术D.全皮下切除植皮术血栓闭塞性脉管炎的治疗
膝关节化脓性关节炎病人体检时最可能发现的阳性体征是
肺癌又称为
A、由具有初级技术职务任职资格的药学、临床医学、医院感染管理和医疗行政管理等方面的专家组成B、由具有初级以上技术职务任职资格的药学、临床医学、医院感染管理和医疗行政管理等方面的专家组成C、由具有高级技术职务任职资格的药学、临床医学
男性,30岁,2个月来感右下肢无力,左下半身麻木。查体:左侧乳头水平以下痛觉和温度觉减退,右下肢腱反射亢进,右侧Babinski征阳性,右侧髂前上棘以下音叉震动觉减退,右足趾位置觉减退为明确病因,辅助检查首选
高血压伴有低血钾,应首先考虑()
下列属于基金市场服务机构的是()。①基金份额登记机构②基金销售机构③基金估值核算机构④基金投资顾问机构⑤会计师事务所⑥基金评价机构
以劳动关系的协议为主,关注的问题主要包括工作规则的建立、职业晋升阶梯和职业生涯设计、以资历为基础的报酬体系、雇佣关系和绩效评估等,属于人力资源的()。
二丑艺术浙东的有一处的戏班中,有一种脚色叫作“二花脸”,译得雅一点,那么,“二丑”就是。他和小丑的不同,不是扮横行无忌的花花公子,也不扮一味仗势的宰相家丁,他所扮演的是保护公子的拳师,或是趋奉公子的清客。总之:身份比小丑高,而性格却比小丑坏。义仆是老生扮
求下列不定积分:
最新回复
(
0
)