首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
admin
2017-03-15
48
问题
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebrated and seasoned, he was thus a natural choice to serve on an independent "commission on growth" announced last month by the World Bank. (The commission will weigh and sift what is known about growth, and what might be done to boost it.)
Natural, that is, except for anyone who takes his 1956 contribution literally. For, according to the model he laid out in that article, the efforts of policymakers to raise the rate of growth per head are ultimately futile.
A government eager to force the pace of economic advance may be tempted by savings drives, tax cuts, investment subsidies or even population controls. As a result of these measures, each member of the labour force may enjoy more capital to work with. But this process of "capital deepening", as economists call it, eventually runs into diminishing returns. Giving a worker a second computer does not double his output.
Accumulation alone cannot yield lasting progress, Mr. Solow showed. What can? Anything that allows the economy to add to its output without necessarily adding more labour and capital. Mr. Solow labeled this font of wealth "technological progress" in 1956, and measured its importance in 1957. But in neither paper did he explain where it came from or how it could be accelerated. Invention, innovation and ingenuity were all "exogenous" influences, lying outside the remit of his theory. To practical men of action, Mr. Solow’s model was thus an impossible tease: what it illuminated did not ultimately matter; and what really mattered, it did little to illuminate.
The law of diminishing returns holds great sway over the economic imagination. But its writ has not gone unchallenged. A fascinating new book, Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations by David Warsh, tells the story of the rebel economics of increasing returns. A veteran observer of dismal scientists at work, first at the Boston Globe and now in an online column called Economic Principals, Mr. Warsh has written the best book of its kind since Peter Bernstein’s Capital Ideas.
Diminishing returns ensure that firms cannot grow too big, preserving competition between them. This, in turn, allows the invisible hand of the market to perform its magic. But, as Mr. Warsh makes clear, the fealty economists show to this principle is as much mathematical as philosophical. The topology of diminishing returns is easy for economists to navigate: a landscape of declining gradients and single peaks, free of the treacherous craters and crevasses that might otherwise entrap them.
The hero of the second half of Mr. Warsh’s book is Paul Romer, of Stanford University, who took up the challenge ducked by Mr. Solow. If technological progress dictates economic growth, what kind of economics governs technological advance? In a series of papers, culminating in an article in the Journal of Political Economy in 1990, Mr. Romer tried to make technology "endogenous", to explain it within the terms of his model. In doing so, he steered growth theory out of the comfortable cul-de-sac in which Mr. Solow had so neatly parked it.
The escape required a three-point turn. First, Mr. Romer assumed that ideas were goods—of a particular kind. Ideas, unlike things, are "non-rival": Everyone can make use of a single design, recipe or blueprint at the same time. This turn in the argument led to a second: the fabrication of ideas enjoys increasing returns to scale. Expensive to produce, they are cheap, almost costless, to reproduce. Thus the total cost of a design does not change much, whether it is used by one person or by a million.
Blessed with increasing returns, the manufacture of ideas might seem like a good business to go into. Actually, the opposite is true. If the business is free to enter, it is not worth doing so, because competition pares the price of a design down to the negligible cost of reproducing it.
Unless idea factories can enjoy some measure of monopoly over their designs—by patenting them, copyrighting them, or just keeping them secret—they will not be able to cover the fixed cost of inventing them. That was the final turn in Mr. Romer’s new theory of growth.
How much guidance do these theories offer to policymakers, such as those sitting on the World Bank’s commission? In Mr. Solow’s model, according to a common caricature, technology falls like "manna from heaven", leaving the bank’s commissioners with little to do but pray. Mr. Romer’s theory, by contrast, calls for a more worldly response: educate people, subsidies their research, import ideas from abroad, carefully gauge the protection offered to intellectual property.
But did policymakers need Mr. Romer’s model to reveal the importance of such things? Mr. Solow has expressed doubts. Despite the caricature, he did not intend in his 1956 model to deny that innovation is often dearly bought and profit-driven. The question is whether anything useful can be said about that process at the level of the economy as a whole. That question has yet to be answered definitively. In particular, Mr. Solow worries that some of the "more powerful conclusions" of the new growth theory are unearned, flowing as they do from powerful assumptions.
At one point in Mr. Warsh’s book, Mr. Romer is quoted comparing the building of economic models to writing poetry. It is a triumph of form as much as content. This creative economist did not discover anything new about the world with his 1990 paper on growth. Rather, he extended the metre and rhyme-scheme of economics to capture a world—the knowledge economy—expressed until then only in the loosest kind of doggerel. That is how economics makes progress. Sadly, it does not, in and of itself, help economies make progress.
The expression "manna from heaven" (Para. 11) can be best replaced by______.
选项
A、disaster
B、unexpected benefit
C、illusion
D、common sense
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/zuSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
Seekingtoframehisnewadministrationasonewithafirmfocusonclosingthegapbetweenchildrenfromaffluentandpoorfami
Thefactorywaspublicly________bytheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyforhavingneglectedenvironmentalprotocols.
AlexEzehoftheCentreforGlobalDevelopment,isathink-tankinWashington,remembersshowingKenyanpoliticiansevidencetha
下面你将听到一段关于中国法制建设的讲话。当今是法行天下的时代。国运之兴盛,政治之昌明,社会之稳定,经济之发展,民族之团结,文化之繁荣,人民之安居乐业,都离不开法律之维系和法律之保障。中国也不例外。一个国家采取什么样的治国方略,关系着国家的前途和命
A、Peoplefromdifferentpartsoftheworldliveandworktogether.B、Therearealmostthreemillionpeoplelivingandworkingin
A、Hikers,B、Bankers.C、Fishermen.D、Internetserviceproviders.C将选项内容迅速与原文对照。该题中特定信息的找寻非常简单,不用推理判断,只需听者迅速对原文中某些职业名作出反应即可。
Whichofthefollowingistrueabouthigh-incomebabies?
Peoplevaluemoneydesperatelybecausetheyvalueoneanotherdesperately;thusthecauseofpanicinthestock-marketplungeis
Belgiummayappeartooutsidersasagoodexampleofethnicpowersharing,butthelasttimetheFrench-speakingWalloonssuppli
随机试题
A.维生素B1B.维生素CC.维生素ED.烟酸E.维生素D与生殖功能关系最密切的是
A.肺部叩诊过清音B.肺部叩诊鼓音C.肺部叩诊清音D.肺部叩诊实音E.肺部叩诊正常
以下关于牙颌面畸形的叙述错误的是
2×14年12月31日,甲公司以20000万元购入乙公司60%的股权,形成非同一控制下的企业合并。2×15年12月,甲公司向乙公司销售一批商品,不含增值税的销售价格为1000万元,销售成本为800万元,货款至年末尚未收到,甲公司计提坏账准备30万元;乙公司
某公司五个部门的总人数是一个三位数,若将这个三位数的个位与百位数字对调,得到的新的三位数与原三位数之和为787,则该公司实际人数是()。
根据下列资料,回答下列问题。2016年年末,纳入统计范围的全国各类文化(文物)单位31.06万个,比上年年末增加1.15万个;从业人员234.81万人,同比增加2.34%。其中,各级文化文物部门所属单位66029个,增加319个;从业人员66.1
下列哪项检查适用于周围神经损伤的诊断
【2011浙江财经大学论述题第1题】试述决定和影响汇率的因素是什么?当前,决定我国人民币汇率的主要因素是什么?
Allmajortheoriesofchildpsychologystatethatchildrenundergoamajorchangebetweentheagesoffiveandseven.Inclassic
A、Thechildrenaretooyoungtobenefitfromcitylife:B、Evenadultsthemselvescannotgoeverywhereinthecity.C、Thereisa
最新回复
(
0
)