首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
48
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
What is "fair-banding"?
选项
答案
Working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
女士们、先生们:我非常高兴能利用英中贸协年会的机会向英国工商界朋友们致以诚挚的问候。多年来,英中贸协一直关心和支持中英关系发展,是堪称两国友好交流的桥梁和互利合作的纽带。在此,我谨对英中贸协及诸位长期为促进中英经贸合作所做的不懈努力和杰出贡献表示
台湾当局和少数国家宣称台湾因为未能加入WHO影响了防治SARS,这完全违背事实海峡两岸中国人民根连根、心连心。台湾发生SARS疫情后,中国中央政府十分关心,迅速采取了一系列加强两岸交流与合作的措施。//除通过医学专业机构向台湾同行传送有关SARS疫情、防
下面你将听到的是一段有关中国教育改革与发展的讲话。党的十一届三中全会以来,随着党和国家工作重点转移到以经济建设为中心。教育在社会主义现代化建设中的地位和作用也越来越重要,我国教育的改革和发展取得了很大的成就。进入20世纪90年代,科学
女士们,先生们:早上好!很荣幸参加此次论坛,与各位共同探讨环保与发展方面的问题。气候变化是环境问题,但归根到底是发展问题。这个问题是在发展进程中出现的,应该在可持续发展框架下解决。只有各方在促进自身发展过程中不断提高技术水平,积极建立适应可持续
冷战以后世界上仅有一个超级大国,势力均衡因此也就不存在了。这种状况是否会持续很久呢?答案取决于你是乐观主义者,还是悲观主义者。还取决于强权政治是否会被纳入受全球单一文化观念影响的某种立宪制世界秩序中。不过,在可预见的未来,第三次世界大战似乎不太可
地球大气层正在转暖,这种迹象日趋明显,这向人们提出了一个重大问题,即地球变暖在多大程度上应归咎于人类活动,又在多大程度上是自然原因造成的?气候变化科学家们正在寻求答案。经过对全球气候变化的全方位定期科学评估,科学家们断定全球气候受到了“显而易见的人为影响”
促进外商投资企业出口便利化,引导外商投资企业充分利用其销售网络扩大出口。鼓励跨国公司在华设立地区总部和研发中心。
当前,世界多极化和经济全球化深入发展,科学技术突飞猛进,给亚洲的发展带来新的机遇,也带来新的挑战。亚洲有49个国家和地区,大部分是发展中经济体。经济全球化,有利于它们更多地获得资金,尤其是跨国企业的投资,加快经济发展和结构调整;有利于它们更好地利用自身优势
随机试题
A、Nevermind.B、Yes,Ihave.C、I’msorry.D、Hereismycard.B本题考查对一般疑问句的回答。对于这类问句,一般先用Yes或No给出判断,然后可根据句意给出相应答复。题目问:“你有没有尝试过一项新的
简述虚拟企业的特征和优势。
图示机构中,物块A、B的质量均为m,两均质圆轮C、D的质量均为2m,半径均为R。C轮铰接于无重悬臂梁CK上,D为动滑轮,梁的长度为3R,绳与轮间无滑动。系统由静止开始运动,则固定端K处的约束反力为()。
建设项目总进度纲要的主要内容有()。
拟对某一住宅项目进行功能评价,经评价人员分析,大家一致认为住宅功能分为适用、安全、美观和其他四方面功能,分别用F1~F4表示。就适用功能而言,又可以具体分为平面布局、空间布置、采光通风和层高层数等项指标,分别用F11~F14表示;就安全功能而言,可以具体分
根据蒙代尔的政策搭配学说,如果经济运行中同时存在着国际收支顺差和通货膨胀问题,为使经济恢复均衡而采取的政策组合是()。
用一个变量来存储跳高比赛成绩,单位为“米”,则该变量的数据类型应声明为()。
我国《合同法》第42条规定:“当事人在订立合同过程中有下列情形之一,给对方造成损失的,应当承担损害赔偿责任:(一)假借订立合同,恶意进行磋商;(二)故意隐瞒与订立合同有关的重要事实或者提供虚假情况;(三)有其他违背诚实信用原则的行为。”试分析:
TheoutbreakofswinefluthatwasfirstdetectedinMexicowasdeclaredaglobalepidemiconJune11,2009.Itisthefirstwo
Thepurposeofanyselectioninterviewistochoosetherightpersonforthejobinquestionortoselectsomeonewhoshowspote
最新回复
(
0
)