首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2010-05-14
62
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not tree. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then --are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the. survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’ s too early to tell if that’ s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’ t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
How does the population survey get it wrong in 2000?
选项
A、The population total in 2000 was reached by different method from that in 1990.
B、There might be some problems with the judgment calls by the researchers.
C、United Jewish Communities offered not enough financial support to the survey.
D、It is the result of the rash of headlines leaving the impression that the population has declined.
答案
B
解析
答案在第二段:judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1OqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AFloridamotherwasarrestedthismonthforallegedlystabbinghertwosons’bulliesinthebackwithboxcutters.Newsreports
OnDecember5,1945,at2:00pm,agroupof【C1】______tookoffinperfectweatherforapracticeflightovertheAtlanticOcean.
OnDecember5,1945,at2:00pm,agroupof【C1】______tookoffinperfectweatherforapracticeflightovertheAtlanticOcean.
OnDecember5,1945,at2:00pm,agroupof【C1】______tookoffinperfectweatherforapracticeflightovertheAtlanticOcean.
A、ThreatsfromalQaeda.B、Concernsovercorruption.C、Looseinformationnetworks.D、Unwillingnesstofightagainsttheterroris
A、TheyencouragedtheKenyanstohelpthemselvesinthefightingagainstthecatastrophe.B、TheyrequestedhelpfromtheUnited
A、Annualmembershipforthefuture.B、Yearlymembershipfornow.C、Quartermembershipforthefuture.D、Seasonalmembershipfor
ThewayAmericansplanforretirementisabouttochange—again.AttheurgingofPresidentObama,theDepartmentofLaborisbac
SincetheendofWorldWarII,abroadconsensusinsupportofglobaleconomicintegrationasaforceforpeaceandprosperityh
Isthestudyofsciencesimplyadisciplineinsearchoflawsrelatingtotheexistenceofmaterialtruths?Orisitalsoasear
随机试题
甲和乙低价购入高粱白酒,灌装后冒充茅台酒,先后共卖出50多箱,获利20多万元。甲和乙构成()。
男,45岁,有高血压史。因阵发性心悸2天来诊。体检:血压120/70mmHg,心率1807次/分,律齐,心音正常,无杂音。1分钟后心率降80次/分,律齐。30秒后又回复至180次/分。最可能的诊断为
女,23岁。问她“你是哪里人?”患者快速回答说:“我是中国人,祖国在我心中,我三中毕业,到山中去,矿物局山中,我在矿山当会计……人类进入新的历史阶段,新的时代。培养一代新人,我们都是革命接班人”,此症状是()
修正液中含有的易挥发且致命的有毒成分是()。
曹雪芹:晴雯()。
①面对海量的网络信息,网民受众一般很少有精力去核实信息的源头和真实性,这就为谣言制造者留下了可乘之机②谣言制造者和散布者多数动机不纯,但不管动机如何,都是靠牺牲社会大众的利益。以满足其一己私欲③制造谣言原本就是一种社会的病态,而通过互联
教师通过言传与身教相结合给学生做出表率,这体现的德育原则是
在信息纷繁复杂的互联网时代,每个人都时刻面临着被别人的观点欺骗、裹挟、操纵的风险。如果你不想总是受他人摆布,如果你不想、混混沌沌地度过一生,如果你想学会独立思考、理性决策,那你就必须用逻辑思维来武装你的头脑。如果以上陈述为真,以下哪一项陈述不必然为真
AnyonecantrackaVenmouser’spurchasehistoryandcollectadetailedprofile—includingtheirdrugdeals,eatinghabitsand
Lookatthetenstatementsforthispart.YouwillhearashortinterviewwithGeorgeJones,executivedirectorforBreadfo
最新回复
(
0
)