首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
35
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
It can be inferred from the passage that the author thinks______.
选项
A、the immigration bill is better than nothing, but it needs to be improved
B、the bill can help to solve immigration problems
C、the bill has a lot of advantages in comparison with previous ones
D、the bill will draw fresh waves of migrants
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1oSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thirtyyearsago,whenChristianBoerwasfirstlearninghowtoreadwhilegrowingupintheNetherlands,hemadealotofmista
Whenthecivilwarended,______tasksconfrontedthepeople.Soldiersfrombothsideshadtobedemobilized,readjustedtocivili
Itwasherviewthatthecountry’sproblemshadbeenexacerbatedbyforeignaid,soaskingforsuchassistancewouldbecounterp
Someentrepreneursperceivethemselvespossessedofan______powertochoosesafepartnersintheir"goingglobal"projects.
Thenonverbal______communicatedinbusinessinteractionsthroughfacialexpressionsandthemovementsofarms,legsandhandsar
Theresearchteamcanhandle________needstobehandled.
下面你将听到外商有关中国零售业发展情况的一段讲话。China’seconomy,oncereliantonstatespendinginheavyindustry,hasincreasinglylookedtothe
Becauseoftheoriginalsin,manyAmericanstaketoalcoholism,whichcostsheavycasualties.
Whichofthefollowinggroupsisdefinedas"newlyweds"?
A、Sellingcomputers.B、Buildingrailroads.C、Teaching.D、Preaching.C
随机试题
焊接工艺评定的补加因素是对焊接接头的冲击韧性有影响的因素。
实用性文体在语言表达上不能出现模糊性。
A.热陷心包兼阳明腑实B.邪热留伏阴分C.热与血结,蓄于下焦D.湿阻肠道,传导失司E.余湿未净,胃气不舒湿温病身热不退,脘中微闷,知饥不食,苔薄腻,其病机为
根据《会计法》规定,有()会计违法行为的,可对其直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员处3000元以上5万元以下的罚款。
关于涉税鉴证业务报告的说法,错误的是()。(2015年真题)
相对而言,下列受房地产行业价格波动影响小的行业是()。
甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为17%,存货采用计划成本核算。A材料的计划成本为0.21万元/吨。2018年6月与存货有关的经济业务如下:(1)6月1日,原材料一A材料借方余额为2500万元,材料成本差异贷方余额为300万元。(2)
一条执行考察任务的科考船,现从B地沿河驶向人海口,已知B地距入海口60千米,水速为每小时6千米,若船顺流而下,则用4小时可以到达入海口,该船完成任务从入海口返回并按原速度航行4小时后,由于海水涨潮,水流方向逆转,水速变为每小时3千米,则该船到达B地还需再航
以下资料,回答81-85题外出人口中大专及以上程度的人口占到了:
Airpollutionkilledaboutsevenmillionpeoplelastyear,makingittheworld’ssinglebiggestenvironmentalhealthrisk,theW
最新回复
(
0
)