首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
admin
2013-01-24
29
问题
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided that the nation’s real problem is too many immigrants of too many kinds. Faced with a daily onslaught against migrants it may be understandable to give in to populist bigotry; but it is not forgivable.
Take this, for example: "National citizenship is inherently exclusionary." So no foreigners need ever apply for naturalisation, then. And" ... public anxiety about migration ... is usually based on a rational understanding of the value of British citizenship and its~ incompatibility with over-porous borders". Straight from the lexicon of the far right. And best of all: "You can have a welfare state provided that you are a homogenous society with intensely shared values."
These are extracts from an article in the Observer, penned by the liberal intellectual Goodhart, who is just one of several liberal thinkers now vigorously making what they consider a progressive argument against immigration. It goes like this: the more diverse a society, the less likely its citizens are to share common values; the fewer common values, the weaker the support for vital institutions of social solidarity, such as the welfare state and the National Health Service.
There are perfectly good reasons to worry about how we respond to immigration, not least the downward pressure on workers’ wages; the growth of racial inequality; and the exploitation of illegals. But the answer to these problems is not genteel xenophobia, but trade union rights, backed by equality and employment law.
The xenophobes should come clean. Their argument is not about immigration at all. They are liberal Powellites; what really bothers them is race and culture. If today’s immigrants were white people from the old Commonwealth, Goodhart and his friends would say that they pose no threat because they share Anglo-Saxon values.
Unfortunately for liberal Powellites, the real history of the NHS shatters their fundamental case against diversity. The NHS is a world-beating example of the way that ethnic diversity can create social solidarity. Launched by a Welshman, built by Irish: labourers, founded on the skills of Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors, it is now being rescued by an emergency injection of Filipino nurses, refugee ancillaries and antipodean medics. And it remains 100% British.
Virtually all of our public services have depended heavily on immigrants. Powell was forced to admit as much when, as minister for health he advertised for staff in the Caribbean. His new admirers will discover that a rapidly depopulating Europe will have no choice but to embrace diversity.
For the moment, however, the liberal Powellites are gaining support in high places. Their ideas are inspired by the work of the American sociologist Putnam, a Downing Street favourite. He purports to show that dynamic, diverse communities are more fragmented than stable, monoethnic ones. But the policy wonks have forgotten that Putnam’s research was conducted in a society so marked by segregation that even black millionaires still live in gated ghettoes.
The prime minister still seems uneasy on the issue. Last week, he wavered uncertainly between backing his pro-immigration home secretary, and a defensive response to Howard’s goading that the government was in a mess on the topic.
Oddly enough, this is a place in the arena of world politics where the PM does not stand shoulder to shoulder with Bush. The Spanish-speaking former governor of Texas recently announced that he would "regularise" the status of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants who had slipped across the border to work. It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions.
Even more peculiar, the prime minister appears to be ignoring not only Blunkett but also his new best friend, the Labour mayor of London, Livingstone, and Scotland’s first minister, McConnell. London wants more immigrants to keep pace with its booming economy, Scotland wants them to boost its ageing work force..Yet the liberal Powellites still seem prepared to confront a Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis, because they are scared witless by the far right. They hope that by appeasing racism, they’ll make it go away. But this is a beast with an insatiable appetite.
The French discovered that too late; the thuggish National Front is now France’s second largest party, with one in five likely to vote for them in upcoming local elections. Liberal secularists who joined in the assault on the rights of French Muslims now have to find a convincing explanation for their cowardice, which has also betrayed the freedom of expression of French Jews and Christians.
In Holland, this spinelessness has ended up as straight leftwing racism. The previously liberal Dutch establishment is now pushing an asylum policy so extreme even the Sun was moved to criticise it.
The line up that favours managed migration and diversity--Blunkett, McConnell, Livingstone, Bush and the Sun--share one quality that the PM should envy m6re than any other at present: they are all popular with the public. Maybe the government ought to pay, more heed to this focus group than the ones that see scary foreigners on every street corner.
Perhaps we should also be creating an even more progressive immigration policy, for example offering easier admission to those who will bring their skills to the depopulated regions of the north. The Americans will next year offer more work permits to IT whizzkids from India than ever before; and before the middle of the century, the world’s strongest economy will become its most ethnically diverse. Our own population is still over 92% white; we shouldn’t be duped by anxious faint-hearts into becoming an all-white backwater.
This passage is most probably part of______.
选项
A、an ethnic study
B、a newspaper article
C、a government report
D、a research report
答案
B
解析
本文为报刊文章。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1raO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、24weeks.B、12weeks.C、23weeks.D、22weeks.B新闻提到,经过一系列投票,英国下议院大多数议员反对将法定终止妊娠期限减少至12周,因此这一提议被最终否决,可见少数议员还是赞成这个提议的,因此B项正确。
A、thelengthB、thehighlightC、thelanguageD、theformatB
A、chaosintheregionB、strongerradicalIslamicextremistsC、Iran’sgainingnewrecruitsD、Iran’spursuingnuclearweaponsopen
______isthecapitalofScotlandsincethe15(上标)thcentury.
TheUnitedNationswasfoundedtopromotepeace,prosperityandhumanrights.Itisdoingsomewhatbetteronthefirsttwocount
Ascollegeseniorshurtleintothejobhunt,littlefibsontheresume--forexample,claimingadegreewhenthey’rethreecredit
Tolive,learn,andworksuccessfullyinanincreasing【M1】______complexandinformation-richsociety,studentsmustbeable
HostilitytoGypsieshasexistedalmostfromthetimetheyfirstappearedinEuropeinthe14thcentury.TheoriginsoftheGyps
Ifyoutraveledononeofthenation’sInterstatesintheselastfewdaysbeforeMemorialDay,youmighthaveencounteredanunu
ChildrenintheUKarenotreadingenoughathome,favouringtelevisionandcomputergamesinstead,accordingtonewresearch.
随机试题
胆汁中与消化有关的主要成分是
乳牙龋齿治疗原则如下,除外
下列关于村民委员会的表述,正确的是:()
我国现有的外汇贷款币种不包括()。
党的十八大以来,以习近平为总书记的党中央从坚持和发展中国特色社会主义全局出发,提出并形成了全面建成小康社会、全面深化改革、全面依法治国、全面从严治党的战略布局,简称“四个全面”。下列关于“四个全面”战略布局的说法,正确的是()。
材料一:促进国民经济又好又快发展,必须加快转变经济发展方式,推动产业结构优化升级,党的十七大从我国经济发展的实际出发,将“转变经济增长方式”改为“转变经济发展方式”。经济增长方式是指通过不同要素投入和技术组合获得经济增长的方法和模式,强
随着信息化的发展,网络已渗透到社会的方方面面,不仅改变着生产、生活方式,也影响着人们的思维和行为模式。通过网络反映诉求、进行监督、提出建议,相对于传统方式更加高效便捷,日益受到广大人民群众的青睐。可以说,互联网已经成为群众意见表达的重要平台。“______
在马克思的《资本论》中,一共提到680多个人物,其中只有一个是中国人,叫王茂荫(1798--1865年),安徽人,1832年考中进士步人仕途。他的货币观点及钞币发行方案最为引人注目,著有《王侍郎奏议》传世。马克思《资本论》第一卷第一篇第三章在谈到货币或商品
OneofthemanypleasuresofwatchingMadMen,atelevisiondramaabouttheadvertisingindustryintheearly1960s,isexamining
CrimewithoutBordersAsgangsgrowincreasinglyglobalized,organizedcrimeisbecomingaproblemhinderinginternat
最新回复
(
0
)