首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
admin
2013-01-24
48
问题
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided that the nation’s real problem is too many immigrants of too many kinds. Faced with a daily onslaught against migrants it may be understandable to give in to populist bigotry; but it is not forgivable.
Take this, for example: "National citizenship is inherently exclusionary." So no foreigners need ever apply for naturalisation, then. And" ... public anxiety about migration ... is usually based on a rational understanding of the value of British citizenship and its~ incompatibility with over-porous borders". Straight from the lexicon of the far right. And best of all: "You can have a welfare state provided that you are a homogenous society with intensely shared values."
These are extracts from an article in the Observer, penned by the liberal intellectual Goodhart, who is just one of several liberal thinkers now vigorously making what they consider a progressive argument against immigration. It goes like this: the more diverse a society, the less likely its citizens are to share common values; the fewer common values, the weaker the support for vital institutions of social solidarity, such as the welfare state and the National Health Service.
There are perfectly good reasons to worry about how we respond to immigration, not least the downward pressure on workers’ wages; the growth of racial inequality; and the exploitation of illegals. But the answer to these problems is not genteel xenophobia, but trade union rights, backed by equality and employment law.
The xenophobes should come clean. Their argument is not about immigration at all. They are liberal Powellites; what really bothers them is race and culture. If today’s immigrants were white people from the old Commonwealth, Goodhart and his friends would say that they pose no threat because they share Anglo-Saxon values.
Unfortunately for liberal Powellites, the real history of the NHS shatters their fundamental case against diversity. The NHS is a world-beating example of the way that ethnic diversity can create social solidarity. Launched by a Welshman, built by Irish: labourers, founded on the skills of Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors, it is now being rescued by an emergency injection of Filipino nurses, refugee ancillaries and antipodean medics. And it remains 100% British.
Virtually all of our public services have depended heavily on immigrants. Powell was forced to admit as much when, as minister for health he advertised for staff in the Caribbean. His new admirers will discover that a rapidly depopulating Europe will have no choice but to embrace diversity.
For the moment, however, the liberal Powellites are gaining support in high places. Their ideas are inspired by the work of the American sociologist Putnam, a Downing Street favourite. He purports to show that dynamic, diverse communities are more fragmented than stable, monoethnic ones. But the policy wonks have forgotten that Putnam’s research was conducted in a society so marked by segregation that even black millionaires still live in gated ghettoes.
The prime minister still seems uneasy on the issue. Last week, he wavered uncertainly between backing his pro-immigration home secretary, and a defensive response to Howard’s goading that the government was in a mess on the topic.
Oddly enough, this is a place in the arena of world politics where the PM does not stand shoulder to shoulder with Bush. The Spanish-speaking former governor of Texas recently announced that he would "regularise" the status of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants who had slipped across the border to work. It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions.
Even more peculiar, the prime minister appears to be ignoring not only Blunkett but also his new best friend, the Labour mayor of London, Livingstone, and Scotland’s first minister, McConnell. London wants more immigrants to keep pace with its booming economy, Scotland wants them to boost its ageing work force..Yet the liberal Powellites still seem prepared to confront a Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis, because they are scared witless by the far right. They hope that by appeasing racism, they’ll make it go away. But this is a beast with an insatiable appetite.
The French discovered that too late; the thuggish National Front is now France’s second largest party, with one in five likely to vote for them in upcoming local elections. Liberal secularists who joined in the assault on the rights of French Muslims now have to find a convincing explanation for their cowardice, which has also betrayed the freedom of expression of French Jews and Christians.
In Holland, this spinelessness has ended up as straight leftwing racism. The previously liberal Dutch establishment is now pushing an asylum policy so extreme even the Sun was moved to criticise it.
The line up that favours managed migration and diversity--Blunkett, McConnell, Livingstone, Bush and the Sun--share one quality that the PM should envy m6re than any other at present: they are all popular with the public. Maybe the government ought to pay, more heed to this focus group than the ones that see scary foreigners on every street corner.
Perhaps we should also be creating an even more progressive immigration policy, for example offering easier admission to those who will bring their skills to the depopulated regions of the north. The Americans will next year offer more work permits to IT whizzkids from India than ever before; and before the middle of the century, the world’s strongest economy will become its most ethnically diverse. Our own population is still over 92% white; we shouldn’t be duped by anxious faint-hearts into becoming an all-white backwater.
This passage is most probably part of______.
选项
A、an ethnic study
B、a newspaper article
C、a government report
D、a research report
答案
B
解析
本文为报刊文章。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1raO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HumanitiesDisciplinesInmanypeople’seyes,thehumanitiesdisciplinesseemtobedyingout.However,actually,studentsconti
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.InonlyfouryearsasaphysicistatBellLaboratories,Scho
Almostacenturyafterhisdeath,thewell-knownFrenchauthorJulesVernehasonceagainmanagedtofiretheimaginationofpeo
Forthisreason,nostyleofconversationismoreextensivelyacceptablethanthenarrative.HewhohasstoredhismemorywithS
Ascollegeseniorshurtleintothejobhunt,littlefibsontheresume--forexample,claimingadegreewhenthey’rethreecredit
Note-takinginLecturesForlisteners,note-rakingisanessentialwaytoachievebetterunderstandingofalecture.Itinvolv
Note-takinginLecturesForlisteners,note-rakingisanessentialwaytoachievebetterunderstandingofalecture.Itinvolv
BodySystemsAbodysystemreferstoagroupoforgans,whicharepartsofthebodythatdoaspecialjob,suchastheheart,
TherighttopursuehappinessisissuedtoAmericanswiththeirbirthcertificates,butnooneseemsquitesurewhichwayitran
ClosebyWestminsterAbbeyontheriversidestandsthePalaceofWestminster,generallyknownasthe______.
随机试题
设y=sinx—cosx,求。
用作衡量组织兴奋性高低的指标通常是
干性支气管扩张症的主要症状是
抗体形成细胞试验是用于检测机体的
甲公司与乙公司签订了一个买卖合同,但由于丙公司的恶意阻挠,乙公司没有履行合同,那么( )。
对县级以上地方各级人民政府工作部门的具体行政行为不服的,可以向该部门的本级人民政府申请行政复议,也可以向上一级主管部门申请行政复议。()(2017年)
L集团的业务包括通用机械、专用机械、配件及服务、钢材贸易四个板块,在集团管理架构中分属于四个事业部。L集团是以生产通用机械起家的。通用机械产品包括各类通用型的机床、磨床等生产设备,其制造的设备广泛应用于各类生产型企业,并由于质量稳定、价格适中,一直受到客户
标志着祖国统一大业向前迈出重要一步的香港回归是在()。
Arecentstudyexaminedmen’sattitudestowomen,lifegoalsandgenderrolesandthefindingsindicatethatthepopularimageo
【B1】【B8】
最新回复
(
0
)