首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2010-06-18
62
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly, all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors--mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans--all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis, a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice, a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference--and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong; now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery--and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all--as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia---which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls---also seems to be on the mend. Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news--even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform--whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
According to the passage, which of the following is NOT the writer’s opinion?
选项
A、Countries paid a heavy price for whichever measure taken.
B、Countries all found themselves in an economic dilemma.
C、Withdrawal of foreign capital resulted in the crisis.
D、Most governments chose one of the two options.
答案
D
解析
根据第二段中的“In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options.”,便可知政府没有什么选择,因此[D]不是作者的观点,因而是正确答案。根据第二段中最后一句“In practice, countries split the difference--and paid a heavy price regardless.”,可以排除[A]和[B]。根据第二段中的“all (investors) tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis”,可以排除[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/21lO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
IntheruinsofthePalmBeachHotelyougetapowerfulsensethataneraisdrawingtoaclosethatIsrael’sattempttosettle
ForquiteafewyearswehavebeentalkingaboutaddictiontotheInternet.Nowweareputtingtogether【C1】______thosestudents
Fiftyyearsago,RobertSolowpublishedthefirstoftwopapersoneconomicgrowththateventuallywonhimaNobelprize.Celebr
InBritain’soverheatedpropertymarket,theonlythingshotterthanthepricesofthehousesforsalearethefirmsthatbuild
Globalwarming?Youmayacceptorrejectthosewhosayitisadangerousphenomenon.Butiftheplanetiswarming,andhumanity
A、StudentslearningFnglishintheirhomecountryshouldstudyabroad.B、ImmersionisoneoftheEnglish-languageskillsforfor
Asaresultoftheagreement,thetwocountries’arsenalsaretobe
8月17日的下午,约克逊号邮船无数的窗眼里,飞出五色飘扬的纸带,远远的抛到岸上,任凭送别的人牵住的时候,我的心是如何的飞扬而凄恻!痴绝的无数的送别者,在最远的江岸,仅仅牵着这终于断绝的纸条儿,放这庞然大物,载着最重的离愁,飘然西去!船上
Anintelligentpersonwillnotallowhimselftobeinfluencedbyadvertisements.Instead,hewill,firstofall,trytogettok
Onedayyouwentshoppingwithyourclosefriendinasupermarket.Atapointoftime,younoticedyourfriendwasstealthilypu
随机试题
在Excel中,当在一个单元格中输入的内容需要分行显示时,应使用____________。
运用经济基础与上层建筑的辩证关系原理,说明我国进行政治体制改革的必要性。
培养基的pH过低时,其抑菌圈可扩大的是
静脉注射操作中,下述不妥的是
现年45岁的李先生决定自今年起每年过生日时将10000元存入银行直到60岁退休,假定存款的利率是3%并保持不变,则退休时李先生将拥有多少银行存款可用于退休养老之用?()
王鹏喜欢女同事李阳,但李阳拒绝与其建立恋爱关系。王鹏于是利用电脑合成技术,将单位集体照上的李阳照片和自己的照片合成在一起,制作成精美的图片向朋友炫耀他和李阳的“真挚感情”。李阳非常恼火,遂向法院起诉。王鹏恼羞成怒,将李阳的照片单独剪下放在单位门口任人践踏。
蔬菜是人类不可缺少的食物,它富含人体需要的维生素、矿物质及消化系统所必需的粗纤维等。下列说法中错误的是:
张某受王某的委托,为王某画了一幅肖像,双方未就这幅画的版权归属做出约定。王某去世后,其继承人王一将这幅画卖给了李某,李某未经任何人同意,将这幅画复制出售。下列关于李某做法的认定中,表述正确的是()。
Thatpeoplehavepersonalitiesgoeswithoutsaying.Petownerswillquicklyarguethattheiranimalshavepersonalitiestoo.Yet
Accordingtothepassage,Indiannameswereimportantbecausethey______.Accordingtothefourthparagraph,weknowanIndian
最新回复
(
0
)