首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
admin
2012-12-14
83
问题
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies working to hugely ambitious growth targets with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to long-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term "innovation" may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance, not all of which are well understood.
Take "type" of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take "degree". Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something "New! Improved!"? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, "innovation" is often just "simple proliferation of similar products". Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners a better approach? In larger organisations, has senior management really made time spent in cross-functional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg. payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it "celebrate failure", for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report) ?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen "by accident". Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill. We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say "these people have mastered the art of innovation"? Brilliant innovation is a wonderful thing. Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
According to the third paragraph, it would be a mistake to______.
选项
A、rely on future benefits in business planning
B、deny the benefits of pursuing innovation
C、neglect the importance of strategic issues
D、predict the outcomes of innovations
答案
B
解析
第三段第1句问:So were we wrong topinpoint innovation as key to long-term mar-ket success?(难道我们把创新做为长期市场成功的钥匙是错的吗?)回答为“surelynot”,所以说否定创新的作用是个错误选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2Q7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whattypeofbusinessdothespeakersmostlikelyworkfor?
WhattypeofbusinessisMegan’sThreads?
A、 B、 C、 B确认IsabellaShaw是不是新市场营销部部长的否定疑问句。(A)是重复问句中的单词marketing、有重复词错误的错误选项;听到That’sright(C)像是对的,但补充说明的主语不是问
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Task4AttractingNewBusinessClientsYouworkforacompany,whichprovidesmeetingfacilitiesforbusinessclients.Yourdepa
Marketing:theimportancetoacompanyofresearchingconsumertastesandtrends
Iscapitalmarketimportantornot?Why?Canyougiveexplanationaboutit?
Answer回答
Askingquestions查询
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
随机试题
把城市分为大城市、中等城市和小城市的依据为()
女患,46岁,以“双手、颜面皮肤肿胀、变硬8个月”来诊。查体:手指及面部皮肤增厚,嘴唇变薄,张口受限。手指、手背肿胀,指尖发凉,关节活动受限。化验:血清RF轻度增高,ANA阳性,血、尿常规正常。患者近日出现干咳,轻微活动后气短,胸片检查未见异常。宜做
关于工作流程与工作流程图的说法,正确的是()。
炉火臧克家金风换成了北风,秋去冬来了。冬天刚刚冒了个头,落了一场初雪,我满庭斗艳争娇的芳菲,顿然失色,鲜红的老来娇,还有各色的傲霜菊花,一夜全白了头。两棵丁香,叶子簌簌辞柯
下列属于犯罪未遂的是()。
反市场细分策略就是在满足大多数消费者的共同需求基础上,将过分狭小的市场合并起来,以便能以规模营销优势达到用较低的价格去满足较大市场的消费需求。根据上述定义,下列选项属于反市场细分策略的是()。
根据统计资料,2006年1~8月份黑龙江对俄出口总值是( )。根据统计资料,2007年1~8月份全国对俄贸易进出口总值是( )。
填入下面句子的横线处,上下文衔接最恰当的一项是:浑身雅艳,遍体娇香,_______。①一对眼明秋水润。②脸如莲萼,③两弯眉画远山青,④分明卓氏文君,⑤何减白家樊素,⑥唇似樱桃。
项目论证是确定项目是否实施的依据,_______不属于项目建设方项目论证的原则。_______不属于项目建设方项目论证的内容。(34)
在下列有关Windows98网络功能的叙述中,错误的是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)