首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
admin
2012-12-14
120
问题
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies working to hugely ambitious growth targets with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to long-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term "innovation" may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance, not all of which are well understood.
Take "type" of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take "degree". Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something "New! Improved!"? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, "innovation" is often just "simple proliferation of similar products". Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners a better approach? In larger organisations, has senior management really made time spent in cross-functional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg. payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it "celebrate failure", for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report) ?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen "by accident". Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill. We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say "these people have mastered the art of innovation"? Brilliant innovation is a wonderful thing. Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
According to the third paragraph, it would be a mistake to______.
选项
A、rely on future benefits in business planning
B、deny the benefits of pursuing innovation
C、neglect the importance of strategic issues
D、predict the outcomes of innovations
答案
B
解析
第三段第1句问:So were we wrong topinpoint innovation as key to long-term mar-ket success?(难道我们把创新做为长期市场成功的钥匙是错的吗?)回答为“surelynot”,所以说否定创新的作用是个错误选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2Q7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisFindersBuyers?
Whattypeofbusinessdothespeakersmostlikelyworkfor?
Whattypeofbusinessdothespeakersmostlikelyworkfor?
Whattypeofbusinessdoesthespeakermostlikelyworkfor?
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopic
•Youwillhearfivebusinesspeoplediscussinghowtobecomeatrueleader.•Foreachextracttherearetwotasks.ForTaskOne,
•Youwillheararecruitingmanagertellinghowtofindjobsontheweb.•Asyoulisten,forquestions1-12,completethenotes
A.beingontimeforanyinterviewB.beingnicetoeveryoneyoutalktoC.beinghonestintheinterviewD.become
随机试题
某一次还本付息债券的票面额为1000元,票面利率10%,必要收益率为12%,期限为5年,如果按单利计息,复利贴现,其内在价值为()元。
三拗汤的组成是
下列不属于产后2小时内在产房内急需观察的内容是
男,重体力劳动工人,腰腿痛,并向左下肢放散,咳嗽、喷嚏时加重。检查腰部活动明显受限,并向左倾斜,直腿抬高试验阳性。病程中无低热、盗汗、消瘦症状。首先考虑的诊断是
甲15周岁,系我国某边镇中学生。甲和乙一起上学,在路上捡到一手提包,打开后,发现内有1000元钱和4小袋白粉末。甲说:“这袋上有中文‘海洛因’和英文‘heroin’及‘50g’的字样,我在电视上看过,这东西就是白粉,我们把它卖了,还能发一笔财。”二人遂将4
公路桥涵设计采用的偶然作用包括有()。
浙江浙海服装进出口公司(3313910194)在对口合同项下进口蓝湿牛皮,委托浙江嘉宁皮革有限公司(3313920237)加工牛皮沙发革。承运船舶在帕腊纳瓜港装货启运,航经大阪,又泊停釜山港转“HANSASTAVANGER”号轮HV300W航次(提单号:
国家管理和评价课程的基础是()
下列关于宪法规定的表述准确的是:
给定资料资料12014年5月,N市放射源丢失事件引发舆论关注。5月10日中午12时,N市环境保护局在其官方微博“N市环保”上发布公告称:“7日,天津宏迪工程检测发展有限公司在位于浦六北路188号的中石化第五建设有限公司院内进行探伤作业期间,丢失
最新回复
(
0
)