首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
admin
2012-12-14
101
问题
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies working to hugely ambitious growth targets with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to long-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term "innovation" may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance, not all of which are well understood.
Take "type" of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take "degree". Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something "New! Improved!"? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, "innovation" is often just "simple proliferation of similar products". Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners a better approach? In larger organisations, has senior management really made time spent in cross-functional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg. payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it "celebrate failure", for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report) ?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen "by accident". Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill. We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say "these people have mastered the art of innovation"? Brilliant innovation is a wonderful thing. Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
According to the third paragraph, it would be a mistake to______.
选项
A、rely on future benefits in business planning
B、deny the benefits of pursuing innovation
C、neglect the importance of strategic issues
D、predict the outcomes of innovations
答案
B
解析
第三段第1句问:So were we wrong topinpoint innovation as key to long-term mar-ket success?(难道我们把创新做为长期市场成功的钥匙是错的吗?)回答为“surelynot”,所以说否定创新的作用是个错误选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2Q7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisMegan’sThreads?
Whatkindofinformationdoesthereportmainlyprovide?
Inthispart,theinterlocutorasksquestionstoeachofthecandidatesinturn.Youhavetogiveinformationaboutyourselfand
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Task4AttractingNewBusinessClientsYouworkforacompany,whichprovidesmeetingfacilitiesforbusinessclients.Yourdepa
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
StrategicPlanning:thefactorsinvolvedinmanagingchangeeffectivelywithinanorganization
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Stafftraining:howtomaintainthestaff’sinterestinthecompany’strainingprogra
Leavingamessageonanansweringmachine
Practisediscussingthistask,andthequestionswhichfollowit,withapartner:STAFFTRAININGREVIEWTheorganisationyouwor
随机试题
民族运动
如题30图所示,三台同型号水泵在工作环境相同的情况下并联运行,并联时泵的效率点为()。
叶某跟随同乡的包工头周某进城务工两年。现叶某欲对拖欠其上资3万元的包工头周某提起诉讼,以下说法正确的是()。
为满足项目管理工作的需要,往往需要对建设工程项目信息进行综合分类,即按多维分类,分类的方法不包括( )。
基金托管费的计提通常是()。Ⅰ.按基金资产净值的一定比率提取Ⅱ.按基金资产总值的一定比率提取Ⅲ.逐日计算,按月支付Ⅳ.按月计算,一次支付
被拒绝承兑、被拒绝付款或者超过付款提示期限的票据,不得背书转让。()
张某向陈某借款50万作为出资,与李某、王某成立一家普通合伙企业。2年后借款到期,张某无力还款。根据合伙企业法律制度的规定,下列说法中,正确的有()。
香山红叶、牡丹花会、断桥残雪和曲院风荷,分别反映的是()四季的自然景观。
如果一项培训内容的掌握有赖于实践,那么这项培训就适于()。
设0<a<1,证明:方程arctanx=ax在(0,+∞)内有且仅有一个实根.
最新回复
(
0
)