首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a
admin
2014-09-17
77
问题
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a link between a company’s success and the personality of its boss. To work out what that personality was, they asked senior managers to score their bosses for such traits as an ability to communicate an exciting vision of the future or to stand as a good model for others to follow. When the data were analyzed, the researchers found no evidence of a connection between how well a firm was doing and what its boss was like. As far as they could tell, a company could not be judged by its chief executive any better than a book could be judged by its cover.
A few years before this, however, a team of psychologists from Tufts University, led by Nalini Ambady, discovered that when people watched two-second-long film-clips of professors lecturing, they were pretty good at determining how able a teacher each professor actually was. At the end of the study, the perceptions generated by those who had watched only the clips were found to match those of students taught by those self-same professors for a full semester.
Now, Dr Ambady and her colleague, Nicholas Rule, have taken things a step further. They have shown that even a still photograph can convey a lot of information about competence—and that it can do so in a way which suggests the assessments of all those senior managers were poppycock.
Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule showed 100 undergraduates the faces of the chief executives of the top 25 and the bottom 25 companies in the Fortune 1,000 list. Half the students were asked how good they thought the person they were looking at would be at leading a company and half were asked to rate five personality traits on the basis of the photograph. These traits were competence, dominance, likeability, facial maturity (in other words, did the individual have an adult-looking face or a baby-face) and trustworthiness.
By a useful (though hardly unexpected) coincidence, all the businessmen were male and all were white, so there were no confounding variables of race or sex. The study even controlled for age, the emotional expression in the photos and the physical attractiveness of the individuals by obtaining separate ratings of these from other students-and using statistical techniques to remove their effects.
This may sound like voodoo. Psychologists spent much of the 20th century denigrating the work of 19th-century physiognomists and phrenologists who thought the shapes of faces and skulls carry information about personality. However, recent work has shown that such traits can, indeed, be assessed from photographs of faces with a reasonable accuracy.
And Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule were surprised by just how accurate the students’ observations were. The results of their study, which are about to be published in Psychological Science, show that both the students’ assessments of the leadership potential of the bosses and their ratings for the traits of competence, dominance and facial maturity were significantly related to a company’s profits. Moreover, the researchers discovered that these two connections were independent of each other. When they controlled for the "power" traits, they still found the link between perceived leadership and profit, and when they controlled for leadership they still found the link between profit and power.
These findings suggest that instant judgments by the ignorant (nobody even recognized Warren BuffeR) are more accurate than assessments made by well-informed professionals. It looks as if knowing a chief executive disrupts the ability to judge his performance.
Sadly, the characteristics of likeability and trustworthiness appear to have no link to company profits, suggesting that when it comes to business success, being warm and fuzzy does not matter much (though these milts are not harmful). But this result also suggests yet another thing that stock market analysts might care to take into account when preparing their reports: the physiognomy of the chief executive.
According to the research of Yale and the University of Pittsburgh,
选项
A、there was a link between a company’s success and the personality of its boss.
B、There was no connection between a firm’s success and its boss’s personality.
C、people could judge a professor’s ability by watching short film-clips of lecturing.
D、people could judge a professor’s ability only after attending lectures for a full semester.
答案
B
解析
第1段第1句提到Yale和Pittsburgh大学的学者想要找出企业的成功与老板的性格之间是否有联系,第3句说到他们没有发现这之间的联系(found no connection),因此B项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3mdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
LeavingHomeGenerally,mostpeoplehaveintheirmindsapictureoftheir"idealhome",butifyouarestudentsorpeopleju
这时,潮水越来越大了,天边要根银色的线条,一会儿变成黑色,一会儿又普通成白色,渐渐地排山倒海般由远向近而来。由于夜静,这潮水确实比白天的大,真如千军万马,两个人面对面讲话都听不到。不知道由于心理作用还是事实如此:夜潮的潮头也高,排列也整齐;潮水到镇海定塔下
Legal,officialdiscriminationagainstblackAmericanshasbeenabolished,but______.
InBritain,thedayafterChristmasiscalled
WhichofthefollowingstatementsaboutDoctorDavidHoiscorrect?
WhichofthefollowingstatementsaboutDoctorDavidHoiscorrect?
BasicCulturalTypesAsbusinessgoesglobal,businessmenhavecometofindthepeopleindifferentculturesactquitediffe
Thenatureofworkischanging.Recenttechnologicaladvances,ashiftfrommanufacturingtoservice-basedorganizations,incr
IwasinnorthernKenya,whichissufferingthroughtheworstdroughttohittheHornofAfricain60years.Thetollofdepri
FoodandFitness:theAmericanObsessionAmericansseemtobealwaysinahurry,whichhasbecomeone【1】【1】_____
随机试题
考虑诊断为其常见的并发症是
党的十八届四中全会明确提出,全面推进依法治国的总目标是()
《儒林外史》写马二先生游西湖,特别关心《三科程墨持运》的销路,是因为()
《规范》根据混凝土立方体___________大小,将混凝土划分为___________个强度等级。
心肌中富含的LDH同工酶是
期末一般无余额的账户有()。
《中华人民共和国未成年人保护法》中所称的未成年人是指()。
简述影响学习动机的因素。
一天,小方、小林做完数学题后发现答案不一样。小方说:“如果我的不对,那你的就对了。”小林说:“我看你的不对,我的也不对。”旁边的小刚看了看他们两人的答案后说:“小林的答案错了。”这时数学老师刚好走过来,听到了他们的谈话,并查看了他们的运算结果后说:“刚才你
()固定资产()资金分配()资金捐献()周转性基金
最新回复
(
0
)