首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below. Theor
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below. Theor
admin
2017-09-22
13
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
Theory or Practice?
—What is the point of research carried out by biz schools?
Students go to universities and other academic institutions to prepare for their future. We pay tuition and struggle through classes in the hopes that we can find a fulfilling and exciting career. But the choice of your university has a large influence on your future. How can you know which university will prepare you the best for your future? Like other academic institutions, business schools are judged by the quality of the research carried out by their faculties. Professors must both teach students and also produce original research in their own field. The quality of this research is assessed by academic publications. At the same time, universities have another responsibility to equip their students for the real world, however that is defined. Most students learning from professors will not go into academics themselves—so how do academics best prepare them for their future careers, whatever that may be? Whether academic research actually produces anything that is useful to the practice of business, or even whether it is its job to do so, are questions that can provoke vigorous arguments on campus.
The debate, which first flared during the 1950s, was reignited in August, when AACSB International, the most widely recognised global accrediting agency for business schools, announced it would consider changing the way it evaluates research. The news followed rather damning criticism in 2002 from Jeffrey Pfeffer, a Stanford professor, and Christina Fong of Washington University, which questioned whether business education in its current guise was sustainable. The study found that traditional modes of academia were not adequately preparing students for the kind of careers they faced in current times. The most controversial recommendation in AACSB’s draft report (which was sent round to administrators for their comment) is that the schools should be required to demonstrate the value of their faculties’ research not simply by listing its citations in journals, but by demonstrating the impact it has in the professional world. New qualifiers, such as average incomes, student placement in top firms and business collaborations would now be considered just as important as academic publications.
AACSB justifies its stance by saying that it wants schools and faculty to play to their strengths, whether they be in pedagogy, in the research of practical applications, or in scholarly endeavor. Traditionally, universities operate in a pyramid structure. Everyone enters and stays in an attempt to be successful in their academic field. A psychology professor must publish competitive research in the top neuroscience journals. A Cultural Studies professor must send graduate students on new field research expeditions to be taken seriously. This research is the core of a university’s output. And research of any kind is expensive—AACSB points out that business schools in America alone spend more than $320m a year on it. So it seems legitimate to ask for what purpose it is undertaken.
If a school chose to specialise in professional outputs rather than academic outputs, it could use such a large sum of money and redirect it into more fruitful programs. For example, if a business school wanted a larger presence of employees at top financial firms, this money may be better spent on a career center which focuses on building the skills of students, rather than paying for more high-level research to be done through the effort of faculty. A change in evaluation could also open the door to inviting more professionals from different fields to teach as adjuncts. Students could take accredited courses from people who are currently working in their dream field. The AACSB insists that universities answer the question as to why research is the most critical component of traditional education.
On one level, the question is simple to answer. Research in business schools, as anywhere else, is about expanding the boundaries of knowledge; it thrives on answering unasked questions. Surely this pursuit of knowledge is still important to the university system. Our society progresses because we learn how to do things in new ways, a process which depends heavily on research and academics. But one cannot ignore the other obvious practical uses of research publications. Research is also about cementing schools’—and professors’—reputations. Schools gain kudos from their faculties’ record of publication: which journals publish them, and how often. In some cases, such as with government-funded schools in Britain, it can affect how much money they receive. For professors, the mantra is often "publish or perish". Their careers depend on being seen in the right journals.
But at a certain point, one has to wonder whether this research is being done for the benefit of the university or for the students the university aims to teach. Greater publications will attract greater funding, which will in turn be spent on better publications. Students seeking to enter professions out of academia find this cycle frustrating, and often see their professors as being part of the "Ivory Tower" of academia, operating in a self-contained community that has little influence on the outside world.
The research is almost universally unread by real-world managers. Part of the trouble is that the journals labour under a similar ethos. They publish more than 20,000 articles each year. Most of the research is highly quantitative, hypothesis-driven and esoteric. As a result, it is almost universally unread by real-world managers. Much of the research criticises other published research. A paper in a 2006 issue of Strategy & Leadership commented that "research is not designed with managers’ needs in mind, nor is it communicated in the journals they read...For the most part it has become a self-referential closed system [irrelevant to] corporate performance." The AACSB demands that this segregation must change for the future of higher education. If students must invest thousands of dollars for an education as part of their career path, the academics which serve the students should be more fully incorporated into the professional world. This means that universities must focus on other strengths outside of research, such as professional networks, technology skills, and connections with top business firms around the world. Though many universities resisted the report, today’s world continues to change. The universities which prepare students for our changing future have little choice but to change with new trends and new standards.
Questions 27-29
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 27-29 on your answer sheet.
In the second paragraph, the recommendation given by AACSB is
选项
A、to focus on listing research paper’s citation only.
B、to consider the quantity of academic publications.
C、to evaluate how the paper influences the field.
D、to maintain the traditional modes of academia.
答案
C
解析
题干问:原文第2段,国际高等商学院协会建议什么?通过题于提示回原文第2 段寻找专有名词“AACSB”出现的地方,该段第1句提到“…announced it would consider changing the way it evaluates research.”可帮助排除D选项。接着找到该机 构名称第二次出现的位置“The most controversial recommendation in AACSB’s draft report…is that the schools should be required to demonstrate the value of their faculties’ research not simply by listing its citations in journals,but by demonstrating the impact it has in the professional world.”通过这句可以看出,该机构不仅要求学校通过论文的引 用率来考查所做研究的价值,还需要考查这些研究对专业领域的影响力。四个选项中, 只有C项谈到“国际高等商学院协会建议评价论文如何影响某个领域”。因此,本题 的答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4iNO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Currentestimatesputthirteenpercentofglobalfloraatriskofextinction,butthisnumberdoesnotinclude______plantsfrom
Afool,especiallyifhehasthemisfortuneofknowinganything,should______itaswellashecan.
Akeyfeatureofquantuminformationscienceistheunderstandingthatgroupsoftwoormorequantumobjectscanhavesta
Relativismamountstothedenialofanobjectiveworldaboutwhichtrueandfalsestatementscanbemade;thereisnoabs
Allmammalsrequiresleep;itisanessentialpartoflife.Forgiraffes,twohoursaLinedayisenough.Forbats,thatnumber
AstheworksofdozensofwomenwritershavebeenrescuedfromwhatE.P.Thompsoncalls"theenormouscondescensiono
UntilAndrewlearnedto______astrictschedule,heseldommanagedtocompletehishomeworkinatimelymanner.
Thispassageisadaptedfrommaterialpublishedin2001.FrederickDouglasswasunquestionablythemostfamousAfricanAmerican
Thispassageisadaptedfrommaterialpublishedin2001.FrederickDouglasswasunquestionablythemostfamousAfricanAmerican
Thispassageisadaptedfrommaterialpublishedin2001.In1998scientistsusingtheneutrinodetectorinKamioka,Japan,were
随机试题
A.6-磷酸葡萄糖脱氢酶B.丙酮酸羧化酶C.糖原磷酸化酶D.糖原合酶糖原合成的关键酶是
根据1980年《国际残疾分类》,将残疾划分为三个独立类别,即残损、残疾和残障,与此相应则有残疾的一、二、三级预防。一级预防的目的是
根据民法理论,下列选项中属于事实行为的是()。
下列流动性风险的预警信号指标,()主要包括银行内部的有关风险、盈利和资产质量,及其他将对流动性风险产生中长期影响的指标信号。
在通货膨胀条件下,股票这类金融资产通常不会面临贬值风险。()
旅游交通相对于一般交通运输而言,其特殊性主要表现为()。
那些古茶树,成林成片,依着陡峭山势不规则地分布,__________于崇山,与周边各种树木、竹林和花草共生,完全依靠大自然的赐予,__________地呼吸生长。它们用年轮记录下的岁月,终于通过云南大规模的古茶树资源普查得到承认,为茶树原生地考证提供了确凿
ItisthoughttraditionallythattreesThesecondresearchprovedthat
Comeon—Everybody’sdoingit.Thatwhisperedmessage,halfinvitationandhalfforcing,iswhatmostofusthinkofwhenwehe
A、10%.B、15%.C、20%.D、25%.C
最新回复
(
0
)