首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Smoking bans in public places are becoming more and more common in many countries. Whether the rights of the non-smokers to brea
Smoking bans in public places are becoming more and more common in many countries. Whether the rights of the non-smokers to brea
admin
2020-09-01
31
问题
Smoking bans in public places are becoming more and more common in many countries. Whether the rights of the non-smokers to breathe in fresh air outweigh those of the smokers to smoke freely is a matter of opinion, manifesting itself in a heated smoking ban debate. In the following excerpt, the author states the effect of the smoking ban. Read the excerpt carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the author’s opinion:
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
The English smoking ban came into force on July 1, 2007. Smoking is banned in almost all enclosed public spaces, including pubs, restaurants and on public transport. Only places that are "like homes" or are specifically excluded by the health secretary are exempt from the ban. In essence, smoking is only allowed outdoors and in private homes. Posters must be displayed in all workplaces reminding people that smoking is illegal. Individuals who defy the ban face a £50 on-the-spot fine: businesses can be fined £200 for allowing smoking or not displaying the signs.
There are many shocking things about the smoking ban—or, at least, they would be shocking if we were not inured to them.
First, there’s the fact that the flimsy evidence that passive smoking causes any significant harm is taken seriously. According to figures from Action on Smoking and Health(ASH)—Britain’s fundamentalist anti-smoking lobby group—the incidence of lung cancer for non-smokers is about 10 cases per 100,000 people. Regular passive smoking(that is, living with a smoking partner, not just encountering one in bars or restaurants)increases that by about 25 percent—12.5 cases per 100,000. So, even if these figures are correct, passive smoking causes 2.5 cases of lung cancer per 100,000 of the population: to put it another way, these are odds of 40,000-to-one of potentially getting lung cancer from passive smoking. On the basis of these remote risks, a war against smokers has been built.
The second shocking thing is that governments now believe it is their right—even duty—to decide what vices we engage in. In this, the UK is not alone. From Argentina to Zambia, governments and local authorities have been queuing up to make it extremely difficult for people to indulge in filthy habits. Only this week, the Dutch joined the smoking ban club, exactly a year after England’s pubs and restaurants went smoke-free(or "smokefree" to use the single-word, Orwellian Newspeak preferred by the New Labour government). On the same day, patients in England’s mental institutions received the "protection" of the law, too—that is, they will from now on be "protected" from smoke by a super-killjoy ban on smoking even in hospitals for the mentally ill.
Another shocking thing is the way in which the people have been browbeaten into accepting this kind of state intervention. A quarter of the population is actively engaged, at some time or other, in the pastime of smoking: and most of the rest of the population was once happy to tolerate that pastime. Yet a noisy minority, joining forces with governments that are increasingly keen to micromanage our most personal affairs and behaviour, has managed to criminalize a perfectly normal activity. This state of affairs has been accepted with barely a murmur of protest.
The consequences for our everyday life have been profound. Smokers are now marked out as "undesirables" , shunted on to the street or to some other open area to partake in their evil habit. The simple business of socializing has been imdermined: alcohol-fueled chatter is persistently interrupted by the disappearance of smokers to the nearest open space. Many people, particularly the elderly, for whom getting up and walking outside every time they want a cigarette is something of an ordeal, are visiting pubs less and less. There is something rather inhumane in the zealous anti-smoking crusade, where the health authorities and their cheerleaders seem happy to make our life worse in the name of "protecting us" from harm.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
My Views on the Public Smoking Ban The harsh English public smoking ban has been in effect for more than nine years, followed by many facts that some of us cannot understand. Firstly, passive smoking does not cause lung cancer as has been imagined: secondly, it is taken for granted that the governments think it is their duty to prohibit public smoking: and thirdly, even heavy smokers accept the ban naturally without thinking of it as abnormal. It seems that smokers are categorized as " undesirables", with socializing undermined and protection abused. Though some people believe the public smoking ban is an unwarranted infringement upon a person’s right of freedom to choose, and the ban is built on junk science, harms social life and many people’s livelihoods, and affects a country’s revenue, I am 100% in favor of the smoking ban. Firstly, smoking bans originate from medical considerations. Some people think passive smoking is not relevant to lung cancer, but research does show that secondhand smoke is nearly as harmful as smoking itself. Those living in homes with smokers have a 20 to 30 percent higher risk of developing lung cancer than those who do not. Many see it unfair that they have to suffer the effects of secondhand smoke when they socialize with those who smoke. Smoking bans remove these risks for the non-smokers. Secondly, smoking bans are implemented because they raise air quality in such establishments as restaurants and bars as well. Some studies have shown that the indoor air quality in bars and restaurants which are smoke-free is nine times better than those without smoking bans. That’s why we see that in many developed countries many smokers have their pastime on the street or in a fixed spot outside the building. What’s more, in part, the smoking ban may eliminate the chance of fire and other accidents as well. From what has been discussed above, it is safe to come to the conclusion that to restrict smoking in public areas is more than welcome.
解析
本题讨论的是公共场所禁烟的问题,属于社会生活类话题。题目要求简要概括所给材料的观点,并发表个人见解。在具体行文方面,考生首先需要简要概述这一社会现象,并就此提出论点,即是否支持在公共场所禁烟;之后,通过阐述原因支持个人论点,并恰当使用举例法、统计法等进行佐证;最后,总结全文,重申论点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4zIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Whatisasymbolandhowcanyouidentifyoneinliterature?Asymboltypicallyencompassesbotha【T1】______andafigurativeme
FiveThingsforCollegeGraduatestoKnowI.Degreedoesnot【T1】______youtoajob【T1】______A.Yoursituationaftergraduatio
A、Soilfertility.B、Weather.C、Pollution.D、Plantingtechnique.B男士说,在夏天开始的时候,在肥沃的土壤栽培香蕉树并给予足够的水,到了冬天也会生长缓慢;即便英国的温室种植,也很难收成。可见,气
FiveTypesofBooksI.IntroductionA.Readingforinformation,hopingto—improveourmindswiththeinformationacquired—g
Ourerawitnessesmanycaseswhereourownlibertycontradictswithothers’.Hereisanexampletoshowthisdelicateissue.A
AreyouconsideringtravelingtoanativeEnglishspeakingcountrytoimproveyourEnglishlanguagesskillsatalanguagescho
A、Roadrage.B、Roadaccidents.C、Modernmotorists.D、Growthofhighways.A主持人在访谈开始部分就提到参加节目的嘉宾Neff会谈及roadrage的概况,而随后的访谈内容也是紧紧围绕
A、HongKong.B、Japan.C、WestAsia.D、Europe.B对话接近尾声时,Mr.Phelps问到新招聘的员工是否有机会在香港以外的地方工作,例如去东南亚,并表示他最想去日本。因此B项是正确答案。
雨声渐渐地住了,窗帘后隐隐的透进清光来。推开窗户一看,呀!凉云散了,树叶上的残滴,映着月儿,好似荧光千点,闪闪烁烁的动着。——真没想到苦雨孤灯之后,会有这么一副清美的图画!凭窗站了一会儿,微微地觉得凉意侵人。转过身来,忽然眼花缭乱,屋子里的别的东
车从这里的地铁爬上天桥,颤颤巍巍地从又乱又脏的街区开过去,往下一望,有时会突然看到一栋破极了的大楼的窗子里,有一些脸色神秘的东方人,穿着日式的大黑衣服,在练拳。再往下一望,看到一个穿脏花裙子的黑老女人,摇摆着生了痛风病的胖腿,拿着一个大塑料袋,气息奄奄地走
随机试题
下肢浮肿,小便量少时应臌胀病后期,常见的辨证是
产后三病的内容是产后三冲的内容是
某项目总投资4000万元,由甲、乙、丙三家企业按50%、30%、20%的股份比例出资组成项目法人,合资合同期限为10年。甲企业注册资金1000万元,乙企业注册资金600万元,丙企业注册资金400万。下述说法正确的是()。
关于施工图预算对工程造价管理部门的作用,下列选项正确的是()。
某公司的注册资本为人民币5000万元,法定盈余公积金累计为1250万元,该公司可以不再提取法定盈余公积金。()
新中国建立后的土地改革政策与过去的主要不同是()。
QE是QuantitativeEasing的缩写或简称,汉语译为“量化宽松”,是一种【31】政策,由中央银行通过公开市场操作加大货币供应量,可视之为“无中生有”创造出指定金额的货币,也被简化地形容为间接【32】钞票。其操作是中央银行通过公开市场操作【3
管理信息系统是一类复杂的信息系统,实现时都要对系统进行分解,在下述中应选哪个(些)作为系统划分的依据?Ⅰ.组织机构Ⅱ.系统功能Ⅲ.企业职能
以下过程的功能是从数组中寻找最大值:PrivateSubFindMax(a()AsInteger,ByRefMaxAsInteger) DimsAsInteger,fAsInteger DimiAsInteger
A、Hehasalreadygottheresult,B、Hetookittwoweeksago.C、Theresultisstillunknown.D、Thetestwillbeavailable.C男士说他上
最新回复
(
0
)