首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
"Just stick to science." This is a common admonition that Science receives when we publish commentaries and news stories on poli
"Just stick to science." This is a common admonition that Science receives when we publish commentaries and news stories on poli
admin
2022-11-16
151
问题
"
Just stick to science
." This is a common admonition that Science receives when we publish commentaries and news stories on policies that readers disagree with. It turns out that "stick to science" is a tired-but-very-much-still-alive political talking point used to suppress scientific advice and expertise. According to a recent issue of The Washington Post, "stick to science" is what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator said in criticizing and silencing its own Scientific Advisory Board, of which two-thirds of the members were appointed by the current administration. The scientific community should not let this cycle continue because facts that have stood up to, in some cases, years of scrutiny are being suppressed in the service of politics.
The latest go-round is one of the most egregious. On New Year’s Eve, the EPA posted four reports from its Scientific Advisory Board commenting on upcoming changes in EPA rules. Three of the four consensus reports from the administration’s own panel are highly critical of upcoming EPA rule changes.
One of the four proposed rules addresses data transparency. The EPA Scientific Advisory Board agreed with the statement that the proposal’s push for transparency would suppress the use of relevant scientific evidence in policy-making. The Board articulated, among other criticisms, that the EPA’s proposed rule was "vague, and as a result, can be interpreted in different ways."
The scientific community needs to step out of its labs and support evidence-based decision-making in a much more public way. The good news is that over the past few years, scientists have increasingly engaged with the public and policy-makers on all levels, from participating in local science cafes, to contacting local representatives and protesting in the international March for Science in 2017 and 2018. Science and the American Association for the Advancement of Science will continue to advocate for science and its objective application to policy in the United States and around the world, but we too must do more.
Scientists must speak up. In June 2019, Patrick Gonzalez, the principal climate change scientist, testified to Congress on the risks of climate change even after he was sent a cease-and-desist letter by the administration. That’s the kind of courage that deserves the attention of the greater scientific community. There are many more examples of folks leading federal agencies and working on science throughout the government. When their roles in promoting science to support decision-making are diminished, the scientific community needs to raise its voice in loud objection.
The upcoming EPA public conference is an excellent opportunity for the scientific community to mobilize. All who value evidence and inductive reasoning should support the conclusions of the Scientific Advisory Board through feedback to the EPA, local representatives, scientific societies, and other science advocacy organizations. Because we need to make the science stick.
According to the last paragraph, the author argued that________.
选项
A、it is a perfect timing for scientists to take action
B、it is EPA’s responsibility to collect all feedback
C、the public should cultivate the inductive reasoning ability
D、the public should form their own scientific conclusions
答案
A
解析
根据题干关键词the last paragraph定位至尾段。该段首句先说明即将召开的环保署公开会议是科学界行动起来的绝佳机会(…an excellent opportunity for the scientific community to mobilize)。所有尊重科学依据和注重归纳推理的人都应该支持科学顾问委员会的结论。最后一句点明文章主旨:因为我们需要坚守科学。观察四个选项,A项中a perfect timing是文中an excellent Opportunity的同义重述,take action是mobilize的同义重述,故正确答案为A项。选项B意思是“美国环保署有责任收集所有反馈意见”,文中只是说到人们应通过提供反馈来支持科学顾问委员会的结论,其中反馈的渠道之一就是给美国环保署提意见,但不是说收集反馈意见是美国环保署的责任,故排除。C项意思是“公众应该培养归纳推理能力”,文中只是说所有尊重科学依据和注重归纳推理的人都应该支持科学顾问委员会的结论,但并未提到公众应培养这种能力,故排除。选项D意思是“公众应该得出自己的科学结论”,文中只是提到人们应支持科学顾问委员会的结论,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5bMD777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Formuchofthe20thcentury,milkwasasimplepartofdailylifeintheU.S.,asfarmersraisedcows,milkmendeliveredbottle
ArecentstudypublishedinthejournalAppliedPhysiology,NutritionandMetabolismhassomeveryexcitingfindingsinthefigh
Countriesmustcreativelycomplementtheuseoffossilfuelsandrenewableenergyintheinterimpendingwhenrenewableenergyc
Countriesmustcreativelycomplementtheuseoffossilfuelsandrenewableenergyintheinterimpendingwhenrenewableenergyc
ThedeclineinAmericanmanufacturingisacommonrefrain,particularlyfromDonaldTrump."Wedon’tmakeanythinganymore,"he
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
随机试题
滤泡旁细胞发生的甲状腺癌是
内分泌系统的反馈调节中,作为靶腺的有
新生儿溶血病的临床表现不包括()
某企业拥有优越的地理环境和一定技术能力的廉价劳动力,拟大力发展出口加工业,该企业较宜实行()战略。
吊车轮压设计值为______kN,最大横向水平力设计值为______kN。疲劳计算按(GB50017—2003)第3.1.6条规定,采用1台吊车标准值,求最大弯矩时可将1台吊车轮压合力与邻近一轮的中线与梁中心线重合,如下图所
旋喷桩施工时相互两桩旋喷间隔时间不应小于()h。
仁达公司2007年1月1日按每份面值1000元发行了300万份可转换债券,取得总收入300000万元,支付发行费用5万元。该债券期限为3年,票面年利率为6%,利息于次年1月10日支付;每100份债券均可在债券发行1年后转换为80股该公司普通股,每股面
【2014河南新乡】道德教育最终应落实于()。
给定资料1.“已经养成习惯了,让我们浪费也浪费不来。”说起低碳、环保,年近80岁的周奶奶话匣子一打开就关不住。“淘米水用来浇花、浇菜,洗衣服的水,还可以洗拖把、鞋子,之后还能攒下来洗厕所,洗过澡的水也留下来洗厕所。我们家里大的水桶就有7、8个。”
根据2012年的统计,中国的GDP仅次于美国,达到了51.8万亿元人民币。
最新回复
(
0
)