首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
"Just stick to science." This is a common admonition that Science receives when we publish commentaries and news stories on poli
"Just stick to science." This is a common admonition that Science receives when we publish commentaries and news stories on poli
admin
2022-11-16
161
问题
"
Just stick to science
." This is a common admonition that Science receives when we publish commentaries and news stories on policies that readers disagree with. It turns out that "stick to science" is a tired-but-very-much-still-alive political talking point used to suppress scientific advice and expertise. According to a recent issue of The Washington Post, "stick to science" is what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator said in criticizing and silencing its own Scientific Advisory Board, of which two-thirds of the members were appointed by the current administration. The scientific community should not let this cycle continue because facts that have stood up to, in some cases, years of scrutiny are being suppressed in the service of politics.
The latest go-round is one of the most egregious. On New Year’s Eve, the EPA posted four reports from its Scientific Advisory Board commenting on upcoming changes in EPA rules. Three of the four consensus reports from the administration’s own panel are highly critical of upcoming EPA rule changes.
One of the four proposed rules addresses data transparency. The EPA Scientific Advisory Board agreed with the statement that the proposal’s push for transparency would suppress the use of relevant scientific evidence in policy-making. The Board articulated, among other criticisms, that the EPA’s proposed rule was "vague, and as a result, can be interpreted in different ways."
The scientific community needs to step out of its labs and support evidence-based decision-making in a much more public way. The good news is that over the past few years, scientists have increasingly engaged with the public and policy-makers on all levels, from participating in local science cafes, to contacting local representatives and protesting in the international March for Science in 2017 and 2018. Science and the American Association for the Advancement of Science will continue to advocate for science and its objective application to policy in the United States and around the world, but we too must do more.
Scientists must speak up. In June 2019, Patrick Gonzalez, the principal climate change scientist, testified to Congress on the risks of climate change even after he was sent a cease-and-desist letter by the administration. That’s the kind of courage that deserves the attention of the greater scientific community. There are many more examples of folks leading federal agencies and working on science throughout the government. When their roles in promoting science to support decision-making are diminished, the scientific community needs to raise its voice in loud objection.
The upcoming EPA public conference is an excellent opportunity for the scientific community to mobilize. All who value evidence and inductive reasoning should support the conclusions of the Scientific Advisory Board through feedback to the EPA, local representatives, scientific societies, and other science advocacy organizations. Because we need to make the science stick.
According to the last paragraph, the author argued that________.
选项
A、it is a perfect timing for scientists to take action
B、it is EPA’s responsibility to collect all feedback
C、the public should cultivate the inductive reasoning ability
D、the public should form their own scientific conclusions
答案
A
解析
根据题干关键词the last paragraph定位至尾段。该段首句先说明即将召开的环保署公开会议是科学界行动起来的绝佳机会(…an excellent opportunity for the scientific community to mobilize)。所有尊重科学依据和注重归纳推理的人都应该支持科学顾问委员会的结论。最后一句点明文章主旨:因为我们需要坚守科学。观察四个选项,A项中a perfect timing是文中an excellent Opportunity的同义重述,take action是mobilize的同义重述,故正确答案为A项。选项B意思是“美国环保署有责任收集所有反馈意见”,文中只是说到人们应通过提供反馈来支持科学顾问委员会的结论,其中反馈的渠道之一就是给美国环保署提意见,但不是说收集反馈意见是美国环保署的责任,故排除。C项意思是“公众应该培养归纳推理能力”,文中只是说所有尊重科学依据和注重归纳推理的人都应该支持科学顾问委员会的结论,但并未提到公众应培养这种能力,故排除。选项D意思是“公众应该得出自己的科学结论”,文中只是提到人们应支持科学顾问委员会的结论,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5bMD777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
"Juststicktoscience."ThisisacommonadmonitionthatSciencereceiveswhenwepublishcommentariesandnewsstoriesonpoli
Thebiggestsuccessofthefossilfuelindustry’sdecades-longcampaigntopushdoubtaboutclimatescienceisthatitforcedth
Thebiggestsuccessofthefossilfuelindustry’sdecades-longcampaigntopushdoubtaboutclimatescienceisthatitforcedth
Countriesmustcreativelycomplementtheuseoffossilfuelsandrenewableenergyintheinterimpendingwhenrenewableenergyc
ThedeclineinAmericanmanufacturingisacommonrefrain,particularlyfromDonaldTrump."Wedon’tmakeanythinganymore,"he
Britain’sprivateschoolsareoneofitsmostsuccessfulexports.Thechildrenofthewealthy【C1】________tothem,whetherfromC
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
随机试题
结合材料回答问题:材料1突如其来的新冠肺炎疫情,对人民的生命安全和身体健康构成严重威胁,对经济社会发展构成严重挑战。面对疫情,全国人民团结一心、众志成城,彰显热爱生命、守卫家园、和祖国命运紧紧维系在一起的巨大力量。在这场前所未有的抗疫斗争中,广大人民群
为治风寒湿痹、筋骨软弱或四肢拘挛之要药的是( )。
关于灭菌法分类的叙述正确的是
下列关于简易程序转为普通程序的做法,正确的是:()
公路路基进行坡面防护时,下述( )不合理。
村民甲、乙两家的承包地相邻。一日,两家为争夺水源发生打斗,甲用铁锨把乙的手臂砍破,乙到医院缝合了5针。案发当日,乙就向A县公安局B派出所报案,派出所调查情况后,依法对甲处以200元的罚款。乙认为对甲的处罚过轻,遂向A县公安局申请行政复议。A县公安局以未成立
现代人事行政的更新机制包括()。
在2011年世界知识产权组织公布的公司全球专利申请排名中,中国中兴公司提交了2826项专利申请,日本松下公司申请了2463项,中国华为公司申请了1831项,分别排名前三位。从这三个公司申请的专利中至少拿出多少项专利,才能保证拿出的专利一定有2110项是同一
危害国家安全罪的“国家安全”,属于()
Careerplanningdoesnotnecessarilyfollowroutineoflogicalsteps.Eachofusplacesweightondifferentfactorsandmaycons
最新回复
(
0
)