Foxes and farmers have never got on well. These small dog-like animals have long been accused of killing farm animals. They are

admin2013-01-24  38

问题    Foxes and farmers have never got on well. These small dog-like animals have long been accused of killing farm animals. They are officially classified as harmful and farmers try to keep their numbers down by shooting or poisoning them.
   Farmers can also call on the services of their local hunt to control the fox population. Hunting consists of pursuing a fox across the countryside, with a group of specially trained dogs, followed by men and women riding horses. When the dogs eventually catch the fox they kill it or a hunter shoots it.
   People who take part in hunting think of it as a sport; they wear a special uniform of red coats and white trousers, and follow strict codes of behavior. But owning a horse and hunting regularly is expensive, so most hunters are wealthy.
   It is estimated that up to 100,000 people watch or take part in fox hunting. But over the last couple of decades the number of people opposed to fox hunting, because they think it is brutal, has risen sharply. Nowadays it is rare for a hunt to pass off without some kind of confrontation between hunters and hunt saboteurs. Sometimes these incidents lead to violence , but mostly saboteurs interfere with the hunt by misleading riders and disturbing the trail of the fox’s smell, which the dogs follow.
   Noisy confrontations between hunters and saboteurs have become so common that they are almost as much a part of hunting as the pursuit of foxes itself. But this year supporters of fox hunting face a much bigger threat to their sport. A Labour Party Member of the Parliament, Mike Poster, is trying to get Parliament to approve a new law which will make the hunting of wild animals with dogs illegal. If the law is passed, wild animals like foxes will be protected under the ban in Britain.
Fox hunting opponents often interfere in the game______.

选项 A、by resorting to violence
B、by confusing the fox hunters
C、by taking legal action
D、by demonstrating on the scene

答案B

解析 根据文章第四段的“…but mostly saboteurs interfere with the hunt by misleading riders and disturbing the trail of the fox’s smell,which the dogs follow”可以看出“fox hunting opponents”的这些做法的目的就是要“confusing the fox hunters”使他们无法正常进行,因此,[B]符合题意。文章第四段提到“现今”(nowadays)“fox hunting opponents”“鲜有”(rare)诉诸“violence”之时,且这不是主要的手段,因此,[A]不正确。从最后一段我们可以看出英国议会还没有通过禁止猎狐的法律,也就没有“fox hunting opponents”采取法律行动的可能,因此,[C]错误。从文章中推断不出“fox hunting opponents”通过示威抗议猎狐的行动,因此,[D]也不是正确的答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5vaO777K
0

随机试题
最新回复(0)