首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Listen to the following passage. Write in English a short summary of around 150-200 words of what you have heard. You will hear
Listen to the following passage. Write in English a short summary of around 150-200 words of what you have heard. You will hear
admin
2012-09-06
36
问题
Listen to the following passage. Write in English a short summary of around 150-200 words of what you have heard. You will hear the passage only once and then you will have 25 minutes to finish your summary. This part of the test carries 20 points. You may need to scribble a few notes to write your summary.
Most economic forecasts are wrong. And governments usually fail when they try to fine-tune the economics in the short term. That’s not surprising, argues Paul Ormerod in his book Butterfly Economics, because few underlying economic theories and models come anywhere near real life. Ormerod, an economist and director of the London Think Tank, has dumped on the blinkered world of mainstream economic thought before, in his book, The Death of Economics. This time, he argues that his colleagues with the dismal science should instead view "society as a living creature, which adapts and learns. "
Ormerod calls his approach butterfly economics, in part to stress its link to biology. But it also reflects a principle advanced, by chaos theorists that the fluttering of a butterfly’s wings can set off a tornado in another part of the globe. Modern economics, he says, are "complex systems which hover on the brink of chaos. " But Ormerod could just as easily have titled it Ant Model Economics, because his theories derive from entomologists’ experiments with ants in the mid-1980s. Two equal-sized food sources were set equidistant from an ant’s nest. How did the colony divide itself between the sources? As it turned out, the proportion of ants visiting one site or the other changed constantly. Sometimes changes were small. Other times, shifts were dramatic and swift. None was predictable. Why? Basically, a foraging ant has three choices: returning to the food source it successfully visited before; being persuaded by other ants, via a scent, to try the other pile; or turning to the humans. People can stick with a previous decision, change their minds on their own accord, or be persuaded by the actions of others.
That people are often influenced by others, the author says, goes a long way toward explaining why some inferior technologies squeeze out superior ones, like VHS videocassette recorders upstaging Betamax VCRS, or why traders continue to buy currencies they know to be overvalued. Popularity breeds popularity. This may all seem obvious. But for economists, it’s a revelation. Standard economic theories nearly always assume that people’s behavior and tastes never change — which helps explain why most theories can’t pass a reality check. In real life, chaos — in the form of human decision making — reigns.
The ant model shows that accurate short-term predictions of ant behavior are impossible. But in long term, there is a pattern to the ants’ randomness. And, Ormerod says, so it is with economics, too. Short-term governmental forecasts usually miss the mark. And the abilities of politicians to alter the cycles of business are " largely illusory," he insists. But in the long term, there is some structure. The business cycle, with all its constant ebbing and flowing, may be uncontrollable and defiant of near-term forecasts. But despite its fluctuations, capitalist economies have grown slowly and steadily over time. That means, he says, mat policymakers should adopt a less-is-more approach. "The role of governments should be confined to trying to mitigate the consequences of a cycle rather than trying to eliminate it. "
Ormerod’s effort to persuade orthodox economists to take human behavior into account more often — regardless of its unpredictability — is a worthy goal. Still, it’s a bit dispiriting that his foraging ants, like Pavlvov’s salivating dogs, depict our behavior so accurately.
选项
答案
Most economic forecasts are wrong. And governments usually fail when they try to fine-tune the economics in the short term. That’s not surprising, argues Paul Ormerod in his book Butterfly Economics, because few underlying economic theories and models come anywhere near real life. Ormerod, an economist and director of the London Think Tank, has dumped on the blinkered world of mainstream economic thought before, in his book, The Death of Economics. This time, he argues that his colleagues with the dismal science should instead view " society as a living creature, which adapts and learns. " Ormerod calls his approach butterfly economics, in part to stress its link to biology. But it also reflects a principle advanced by chaos theorists that the fluttering of a butterfly’s wings can set off a tornado in another part of the globe. Modern economics, he says, are "complex systems which hover on the brink of chaos. " But Ormerod could just as easily have titled it Ant Model Economics, because his theories derive from entomologists’ experiments with ants in the mid-1980s. Two equal-sized food sources were set equidistant from an ant’s nest. How did the colony divide itself between the sources? As it turned out, the proportion of ants visiting one site or the other changed constantly. Sometimes changes were small. Other times, shifts were dramatic and swift. None was predictable. Why? Basically, a foraging ant has three choices: returning to the food source it successfully visited before; being persuaded by other ants, via a scent, to try the other pile; or turning to the humans. People can stick with a previous decision, change their minds on their own accord, or be persuaded by the actions of others. That people are often influenced by others, the author says, goes a long way toward explaining why some inferior technologies squeeze out superior ones, like VHS videocassette recorders upstaging Betamax VCRS, or why traders continue to buy currencies they know to be overvalued. Popularity breeds popularity. This may all seem obvious. But for economists, it’s a revelation. Standard economic theories nearly always assume that people’s behavior and tastes never change — which helps explain why most theories can’t pass a reality check. In real life, chaos — in the form of human decision-making — reigns. The ant model shows that accurate short-term predictions of ant behavior are impossible. But in long term, there is a pattern to the ants’ randomness. And, Ormerod says, so it is with economics, too. Short-term governmental forecasts usually miss the mark. And the abilities of politicians to alter the cycles of business are "largely illusory," he insists. But in the long term, there is some structure. The business cycle, with all its constant ebbing and flowing, may be uncontrollable and defiant of near-term forecasts. But despite its fluctuations, capitalist economies have grown slowly and steadily over time. That means, he says, that policymakers should adopt a less-is-more approach. " The role of governments should be confined to trying to mitigate the consequences of a cycle rather than trying to eliminate it. " Ormerod’s effort to persuade orthodox economists to take human behavior into account more often — regardless of its unpredictability — is a worthy goal. Still, it’s a bit dispiriting that his foraging ants, like Pavlvov’s salivating dogs, depict our behavior so accurately.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/630O777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Theshockoftheglobalcreditcrunchandsoaringcommoditypricesreachesstraighttothefrontdoorsofeveryfamilyinevery
Inthepopularmind,theInternetistherealizationoftheglobalvillage,wheretheflowofinformationandideasisunimpeded
Inthepopularmind,theInternetistherealizationoftheglobalvillage,wheretheflowofinformationandideasisunimpeded
"Thelanguageofacomposer",Carduswrote,"hisharmonies,rhythms,melodies,colorsandtexture,cannotbeseparatedexceptby
Hedrovefastandarrivedaboutanhour______themeetingschedule.
Afterall,thecandidatewasendorsedbythegovernor’sboardandmanyofthelocalpartymembers.
Thecommitteereporteditsfindingsafterathoroughinvestigation.
Stylisticdifferencesareavailabletoallmaturenativespeakersandinliteratecommunitiestoallwriters,aswellastofore
Asthepreviousspeecheshadbeentoolong,thechairmanhadtoaskthefollowingspeakersto________theirtalksintofiveminut
Whoweretakenhostageinthereportedkidnapping?
随机试题
我国公务员任用的主要方式是()
A.Aα类纤维B.Aγ类纤维C.B类纤维D.C类纤维支配骨骼肌梭内肌纤维收缩成分的神经纤维是
患者男,30岁。反复发作性喘息6年,再发3天来诊。查体:患者神志清楚,呼吸急促,呼吸频率24次/分,双肺可闻及以呼气相为主哮鸣音。心率110次/分,律齐,无杂音。经过上述治疗后,患者曾病情好转,神志转清、氧饱和度维持在96%以上,病程中出现发热,气道脓
以下不是放置引流的适应证的是
患者,男,20岁,足球比赛时不慎扭伤踝部,此时应立即给予的措施是()
对于局麻药的使用,以下哪些叙述是正确的?()
薛某驾车撞死一行人,交警大队确定薛某负全责。鉴于找不到死者亲属,交警大队调处后代权利人向薛某预收了6万元赔偿费,商定待找到权利人后再行转交。因一直未找到权利人,薛某诉请交警大队返还6万元。根据社会主义法治理念公平正义要求和相关法律规定,下列哪一表述是正确的
某沥青混合料车辙试验结果如下表所示,请回答以下问题。沥青混合料车辙试验注意事项包括()。
甲股份有限公司(以下简称甲公司)为增值税一般纳税人,适用增值税税率为16%。2018年1月1日,所有者权益总额为10000万元,其中股本6000万元,资本公积1000万元,盈余公积1200万元,未分配利润1800万元。2018年度甲公司发生如下经济业务:
女性,47岁,双手指近端指间关节和掌指关节对称性肿痛已2个月,ESR:42mm/h,CRP:100mg,L,WBC:8.2×109/L,血红蛋白:110g/L,RF(-),该患者最可能的诊断是
最新回复
(
0
)