首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law. When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s
Vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law. When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s
admin
2019-11-02
42
问题
Vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law. When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s amazing how little we have developed in other respects. We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas. We may despise them because they mistook these goings-on for entertainment. We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better. But are our feelings of superiority really justified? Are we any less blood-thirsty? Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest? Don’t the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence? Human beings remain as bloodthirsty as ever they were. The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungry lions, tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age; sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting.
It is really incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames. Let us not deceive ourselves. Any talk of the sporting spirit’ is sheer hypocrisy. People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring. Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence. A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news.
Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen. They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence.
There is an undeniable truth that a fairly large amount of people lose their lives in extreme sports activities. It is known to all that most extreme sports are carried out in very atrocious natural circumstances which may lead to unpredictable dangers. To make things worse, a fair number of participants hold inadequate knowledge of both the requirements of extreme sports and the skills to tackle emergent problems they will encounter. All those factors together result in the seemingly dangerous-and-demanding sports which are considered a waste of time in people’s mind.
Objectively speaking, participating in extreme sports benefits people in various aspects involving the proof of self-worth and forming valuable characters. As the comment mentions, the television live show of extreme sports is, in some people’s perspective, an awful propaganda of risking lives. We may get back to the basic question that why those people want to risk their lives in such a "meaningless activity". And why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much? You may well ask. The answer is simple: they are uncivilized. For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally — admittedly with little success. But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past. Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to be. Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world. Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly. These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law. The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence. If we banned dangerous and violent sports, we would be moving one step further to improve mankind. We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings.
The purpose of the author in writing this passage is______.
选项
A、to illustrate we human beings improve ourselves by banning the violent sports
B、to illustrate we can improve the law by banning the dangerous sports
C、to show we must take positive steps to improve the welfare system
D、to show law is the main instrument of social change
答案
A
解析
作者的写作目的是?通过制止野蛮体育项目,我们能改善人类自身。选项B通过制止野蛮体育活动,我们能改善法律,不完全对。作者明确指出要用法律来禁止野蛮体育项目。选项C我们必须采取积极步骤来改善社会福利体制。选项D表明法律是社会变革的主要工具,偏离题旨。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7AbK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Youngpeoplearefacinganuncertainfuture.Asthe21stcenturydawned,theywerepromisedawealthofprospectsunless【M1】____
Youngpeoplearefacinganuncertainfuture.Asthe21stcenturydawned,theywerepromisedawealthofprospectsunless【M1】____
InaBertelsmannFoundationstudyonsocialjusticereleasedthisfall,theUnitedStatescameindeadlylastamongtherich【M1】
Educationalphilosophyhaschangedagreatdealinthe50yearssinceIwasinschool.Backthen,forexample,Ihadthehighe
TheabilitytomovetofindnewworkhaslongbeenacornerstoneoftheAmericanDream.Thereisgrowingconcernthatbeingst
StructureoftheCanadianGovernmentI.Introduction—Canada’ssystemofgovernmentwasbasedontheBritishsystemofparliam
A、Theyarerealistic.B、Theyareshallow.C、Theyareenviable.D、Theyarematerialistic.B根据句(1)可知,人们认为那些想找个亿万富翁结婚的人既庸俗又浅薄,故答案为[
A、Internetaddiction.B、Internetversatility.C、Internetsecurity.D、Internettechnology.A根据句(1)可知,今天要讨论的问题是人们是否在电脑上花费过多的时间,之后整
Whenindividualfamilymembersareexposedtoandadoptthenewideas,thetendencyisforconflicttoriseandforthoseincon
还是成都的那些旧街道,我跟着你一步一步地走过平坦的石板路,我望着你的背影,心里安慰地想:父亲还很康健呢。一种幸福的感觉使我的全身发热了。我那时不会知道我是在梦中,也忘记了二十五年来的艰苦日子。在戏园里,我坐在你旁边,看台上的武戏,你还详细地给我解
随机试题
创造“人本主义”治疗的学者是
按“五轮学说”上下眼睑所属脏腑是()
痄腮的病因是感受
盐酸地尔硫革符合下列哪些性质
会计从业资格证书是具备会计从业资格的证明文件,该证书在()范围内有效。
我国已形成了具有中国特色的地方政府债券市场,即以企业债券形式发行地方政府债券。()
某公司是一家由事业单位转而成的股份制企业。在转制之前,员工的薪酬基本上是按照职务、技术职称和工龄等来确定的,员工的工资差别不大,所以干多和干少一个样,尽管单位的效率不高,但大家觉得挺满足。但改制以后,由于企业要直接面对激烈的市场竞争,所以公司的领导层决定打
前进:倒退()
中华传统美德的根本要求是()
冯.诺依曼型体系结构的计算机硬件系统的5大部件是
最新回复
(
0
)