首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s first duty to give instant obedie
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s first duty to give instant obedie
admin
2017-11-28
21
问题
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s first duty to give instant obedience to orders given by his military superiors? And apart from duty, will not the soldier suffer severe punishment, even death, if he refuses to do what he is ordered to do? If, then, a soldier is told by his superior to burn this house or to shoot that prisoner, how can he be held criminally accountable on the ground that the burning or shooting was a violation of the laws of war?
These are some of the questions that are raised by the concept commonly called "superior orders", and its use as a defense in war crimes trials. It is an issue that must be as old as the laws of war themselves, and it emerged in legal guise over three centuries ago when, after the Stuart restoration in 1660, the commander of the guards at the trial and execution of Charles I was put on trial for treason and murder. The officer defended himself on the ground "that all he did was as a soldier, by the command of his superior officer whom he must obey or die," but the court gave him short shrift, saying that "when the command is traitorous, then the obedience to that command is also traitorous."
Though not precisely articulated, the rule that is necessarily implied by this decision is that it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders, but that he may disobey — and indeed must, under some circumstances — unlawful orders. Such has been the law of the United States since the birth of the nation. In 1804, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that superior orders will justify a subordinate’s conduct only "if not to perform a prohibited act", and there are many other early decisions to the same effect.
A strikingly illustrative case occurred in the wake of that conflict of which most Englishmen have never heard (although their troops burned the White House) and which we call the War of 1812. Our country was badly split by that war too and, at a time when the United States Navy was not especially popular in New England, the ship-in-the-line Independence was lying in Boston Harbor. A pass-by directed abusive language at a marine standing guard on the ship, and the marine, Bevans by name, ran his bayonet through the man. Charged with murder, Bevans produced evidence that the marines on the Independence had been ordered to bayonet anyone showing them disrespect. The case was tried before Justice Joseph Story, next to Marshall, the leading judicial figure of those years, who charged that any such order as Bevans had invoked " would be illegal and void" , and, if given and put into practice, both the superior and the subordinate would be guilty of murder. In consequence, Bevans was convicted.
The order allegedly given to Bevans was pretty drastic, and Boston Harbor was not a battlefield; perhaps it was not too much to expect the marine to realize that literal compliance might lead to bad trouble. But it is only too easy to conceive of circumstances where the matter might not be at all clear. Does the subordinate obey at peril that the order may later be ruled illegal, or is protected unless he has a good reason to doubt its validity?
What was the rule implied by the trail of the commander of the guards?
选项
A、A soldier must obey lawful orders, be he right or wrong.
B、Even if an order is unlawful, the soldier must still obey it.
C、A soldier may or must disobey unlawful orders or he must die.
D、It is the soldier’s duty to obey superior orders whatever they are.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。文章第二段列举了the commander of the guards的例子,他自己因处决查理一世而被送上法庭,法庭驳回他“只是服从上级命令”的辩解,宣布“当命令是叛国的,那么服从命令也是叛国的”。接着第三段第一句提到,这个判决隐含的规则是:士兵的职责是服从合法的命令,但可以——事实上在某些情况下必须——不服从非法的命令。由此可知,答案为[C]项。文中没有提到士兵必须不分对错地服从合法的命令,故排除[A]项,[B]项和[D]项与文意相悖。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7iua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
InEnglishindividualisticculture,oneshouldbotherEnglishmenwithoutagoodreasonandmakingappointmentbeforehandseems
InEnglishifawordbeginswitha[1]ora[r],thenthenextsoundmustbeavowel.Thisisa(n)().
TheToriesweretheforerunnersof________,whichstillbearsthisnicknametoday.
世界军人运动会(MilitaryWorldGames),简称“军运会”,是国际军事体育理事会(ConseilInternationalduSportMilitaire,缩略为CISM,英语名称为InternationalMilitaryS
世界军人运动会(MilitaryWorldGames),简称“军运会”,是国际军事体育理事会(ConseilInternationalduSportMilitaire,缩略为CISM,英语名称为InternationalMilitaryS
Althoughadolescentmaturationalanddevelopmentstatesoccurinanorderlysequence,theirtiming______withregardtoonseta
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabureaucraticmanagementinwhichmanbecomesasmall,
Inourhighlytechnologicalsociety,thenumberofjobsforunskilledworkersis______
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopedachecklistofstressfulevents.Theyappreciatedthe
随机试题
位于两筋之间的穴位有
在我国农业社会主义改造的过程中,第二个阶段主要是建立初级农业生产合作社,它的性质是()
关于门静脉高压症的术前护理错误的是
某国有企业具有法人资格,于1991年8月10日由其厂长李某出面向民营企业借款50万元,借款期限6个月。1992年2月10日,该国有企业向出借人还款20万元,余款一直未还。1992年5月10日,该国有企业召开的职工代表大会上作出决议,罢免李某的厂长职务,并组
审计风险模型的建立,不仅从理论上解决了注册会计师以制度为基础采用抽样审计的随意性,而且较好地解决了审计资源的分配问题。按照风险导向审计的基本要求,注册会计师应当将审计资源分配到()。
骨骼肌中分布着多种神经,下列选项中哪条神经不分布于骨骼肌中?()
设f(x)在(-1,1)内二阶连续可导,且f’’(x)≠0.证明:(1)对(-1,1)内任一点x≠0,存在唯一的θ(x)∈(0,1),使得f(x)=f(0)+xf’[θ(x)x];(2)
软件设计中模块划分应遵循的准则是()。
Atsometimeinyourlifeyoumayhaveastrongdesiretodosomethingstrangeorterrible.However,chancesarethatyoudon’t
【S1】【S4】
最新回复
(
0
)