首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s first duty to give instant obedie
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s first duty to give instant obedie
admin
2017-11-28
8
问题
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s first duty to give instant obedience to orders given by his military superiors? And apart from duty, will not the soldier suffer severe punishment, even death, if he refuses to do what he is ordered to do? If, then, a soldier is told by his superior to burn this house or to shoot that prisoner, how can he be held criminally accountable on the ground that the burning or shooting was a violation of the laws of war?
These are some of the questions that are raised by the concept commonly called "superior orders", and its use as a defense in war crimes trials. It is an issue that must be as old as the laws of war themselves, and it emerged in legal guise over three centuries ago when, after the Stuart restoration in 1660, the commander of the guards at the trial and execution of Charles I was put on trial for treason and murder. The officer defended himself on the ground "that all he did was as a soldier, by the command of his superior officer whom he must obey or die," but the court gave him short shrift, saying that "when the command is traitorous, then the obedience to that command is also traitorous."
Though not precisely articulated, the rule that is necessarily implied by this decision is that it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders, but that he may disobey — and indeed must, under some circumstances — unlawful orders. Such has been the law of the United States since the birth of the nation. In 1804, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that superior orders will justify a subordinate’s conduct only "if not to perform a prohibited act", and there are many other early decisions to the same effect.
A strikingly illustrative case occurred in the wake of that conflict of which most Englishmen have never heard (although their troops burned the White House) and which we call the War of 1812. Our country was badly split by that war too and, at a time when the United States Navy was not especially popular in New England, the ship-in-the-line Independence was lying in Boston Harbor. A pass-by directed abusive language at a marine standing guard on the ship, and the marine, Bevans by name, ran his bayonet through the man. Charged with murder, Bevans produced evidence that the marines on the Independence had been ordered to bayonet anyone showing them disrespect. The case was tried before Justice Joseph Story, next to Marshall, the leading judicial figure of those years, who charged that any such order as Bevans had invoked " would be illegal and void" , and, if given and put into practice, both the superior and the subordinate would be guilty of murder. In consequence, Bevans was convicted.
The order allegedly given to Bevans was pretty drastic, and Boston Harbor was not a battlefield; perhaps it was not too much to expect the marine to realize that literal compliance might lead to bad trouble. But it is only too easy to conceive of circumstances where the matter might not be at all clear. Does the subordinate obey at peril that the order may later be ruled illegal, or is protected unless he has a good reason to doubt its validity?
What was the rule implied by the trail of the commander of the guards?
选项
A、A soldier must obey lawful orders, be he right or wrong.
B、Even if an order is unlawful, the soldier must still obey it.
C、A soldier may or must disobey unlawful orders or he must die.
D、It is the soldier’s duty to obey superior orders whatever they are.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。文章第二段列举了the commander of the guards的例子,他自己因处决查理一世而被送上法庭,法庭驳回他“只是服从上级命令”的辩解,宣布“当命令是叛国的,那么服从命令也是叛国的”。接着第三段第一句提到,这个判决隐含的规则是:士兵的职责是服从合法的命令,但可以——事实上在某些情况下必须——不服从非法的命令。由此可知,答案为[C]项。文中没有提到士兵必须不分对错地服从合法的命令,故排除[A]项,[B]项和[D]项与文意相悖。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7iua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Americanexceptionalismandisolationism
联合国教育、科学及文化组织(简称:联合国教科文组织,英文:UnitedNationsEducationalScientific:andCulturalOrganization,缩写UNESCO)成立于1946年11月,是联合国下属的专门机构之一。
When______,manyracistscannotgivealogicalreasonfortheirattitudestowardsotherracialgroups.
Althoughhesufferedfromdiscrimination,MartinLutherKingisamanwhobelievedinreconciliationandonlyrarely______agr
Whilethishealthylifestyleapproachtohealthworkedforsome(thewealthymembersofsociety),peopleexperiencingpoverty,u
Althoughspecificconcernsmaydeterminetheintentofaresearchproject,itsresultsareoften______.
ThevocabularyandgrammaticaldifferencesbetweenBritishandAmericanEnglisharesotrivialandfewashardly______.
IndigenousAustraliansbelievethatreconciliationisnecessarybutthegovernmentshould,mostimportantly,makeaformalapolo
Ifanydamagetothegoodsoccurs,aclaimmay______theinsuranceagentatyourend,whowillundertaketocompensateyoufort
Thesun,rain,andfrosthaddamagedthe________wallofthisoldbuilding.
随机试题
1959年我国税制改革的内容是()
Graves病最常发生哪种心律失常
关于水肿,哪项描述正确
溴隐亭治疗帕金森病的作用机制是()。
需将一只220V,8W的指示灯安装在配电板上,电源电压为380V,应串接一只()的电阻。
根据《建筑法》的规定,建设单位应当自领取施工许可证之日起3个月内开工。因故不能按期开工的,应当向发证机关申请延期,延期以()次为限,每次不超过()个月。
下列各项中,属于会计分录必须具备的要素的是()。
公积金个人住房贷款实行()的原则。[2015年5月真题]
(凡要求计算的项目,均需列出计算过程;计算结果出现小数的,均保留小数点后两位。)A股份有限公司(本题下称“A公司”)为上市公司,2009年至2010年发生的相关交易或事项如下:(1)2009年1月1日递延所得税资产余额为25万元,均为对应收B公司账款
最大化未来股票价格作为公司理财的目标恰当吗?
最新回复
(
0
)