首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2009-04-27
52
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the US Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a powers line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "Ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes, "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." The Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense built into every warship and plane.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial viewpoints in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on cancer
答案
D
解析
主旨题。主章首句就提到电会致癌吗?接着讲述人们对这一问题的不同观点,分别以美国环保署和五角大楼的科学家为例。可见只有D符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7ra4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
[A]FewerchildrenattendCatholicschoolsnow[B]Changeinhigher-incomefamilieswillleadtochangeofprivateschoolpo
Thatsmokingcauseslungcanceriswellestablished.Butwhatcausessmoking?Thisisthequestionattheheartofastudypubli
MatthewBreuerhassharedthepasswordstohiscomputer,emailandsocialmediaaccountswitheverygirlfriendhe’severhad."I
Whyinanageofadvancedtechnology,shouldsomanypeoplestillclingtoanancientbelief?Inpartitmustbebecauseastrolo
AUSdrugcompanyhasincreasedthepriceofanacnecreambymorethan3,900%to$9,561inlessthan18monthsinthelatestex
Dofriendsoftheoppositegenderdistractteenagers,hamperingtheiracademicperformance?Itmayseemobvious,andyetitish
Theunhealthyingredientsandlownutritioncontentofthefoodcanmakeyoulessactiveandlazy,newresearchshows.Nosurpri
Theunhealthyingredientsandlownutritioncontentofthefoodcanmakeyoulessactiveandlazy,newresearchshows.Nosurpri
随机试题
下列哪项一般不属于实性病理反映
胆脂瘤最多见于下列哪种类型乳突
成年人中最多见的急性白血病是
资产负债比率是资产总额除以负债总额的百分比。()
(2012年)根据胜任特征结构冰山图,水面以上的部分包括()。
我国《旅游法》第7条规定,国务院建立健全(),对旅游业发展进行综合协调。
20世纪早期,主张“生活即教育”“社会即学校”“教学做合一”,对改造中国旧教育做出伟大贡献的教育家是()。
实施素质教育,是对应试教育的否定,是对以往基础教育的否定。()(2014·河南)
根据以下资料,回答106-110题。固定资产投资稳定增长。2006年江苏省完成全社会固定资产投资10063.65亿元,比上年增长20.3%。其中,城镇固定资产投资完成7473.7亿元,增长20.2%;农村固定资产投资2589.95亿元,增长20.7%。
对于低头一族来说,一个标记明显的弱势人士来了,有的想注意到没有注意到,有的不想注意也乐得没有注意,这两种状态共同构成了人们“看见”需求的挡板。因为没有看见,“公德的旋律”就无法响起,公德心就无法________。技术进步带给每个人更丰富的世界,但将人们有意
最新回复
(
0
)