首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Why bother with the study of history? What possible connections exist between an increasingly remote past and our own predicamen
Why bother with the study of history? What possible connections exist between an increasingly remote past and our own predicamen
admin
2012-01-19
73
问题
Why bother with the study of history? What possible connections exist between an increasingly remote past and our own predicaments (困境) in the present? Can stories about other peoples in other places at any other times have any meaning in an age of vaulting (飞速发展的) technology and traumatizing (惊人) change? Is it reasonable to think that anyone can benefit from the experiences of others in a presumably unprecedented (前所未有的) time when our political and economic systems falter (踉跄), and the nuclear, peril causes nightmares of dread? These questions hold more than rhetorical importance and compel serious answers. Undergraduates in all programs of study need to know what they can hope to learn and how their experiences will affect their capacity to think and act creatively in the future.
Skeptics have often argued that a knowledge of history will not provide much help. The American industrialist Henry Ford characterized history as "bunk". Although the observation probably tells more about the limitations of Ford’s mind that about the nature of history, other luminaries (名人) have expressed similar reservations. In the seventeenth century, the French scientist and mathematician Rene Descartes worried that undue curiosity about the past would result in excessive ignorance of the present. Another Frenchman, Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaire, a philosopher and historian, described history as "a pack of tricks we play on the dead". Although he meant the comment as an appeal for history written more accurately, he inadvertently gave support to the cynical claim that historians invariably fall into one of three camps: those as George Wilhelm Fried Rich Hegel, a nineteeth century German, feared that the only thing we can learn from history is that no one learns anything from history.
Undoubtedly the writing of history is a perilous (危险的) venture. A common lament among historians is the fact that every day requires them to face up to their incomprehension of the world and their incapacity to interpret their evidence correctly. Surely they should rank among the humblest of people. Nevertheless, for many, the sheer joy of the endeavor makes the risk worthwhile. Some even have assigned to themselves important and useful functions. Most historians regard the study of history as a way for human beings to acquire self knowledge. Edward Gibbon, the great English historian of the Roman Empire, sadly described the historical record as consisting of "the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind". Though certainly indicative of a wretched and dismal (阴沉的) state of affairs, his remark also held forth the possibility of escaping such conditions through rational in quiry. Transcendence over the past could come about only through knowledge.
Other historians have invoked (行使) their discipline as a kind of ethical sanction (制裁). Lord Acton, a Victorian Englishman, insisted upon maintaining "morality as the sole impartial criterion of men and things". He called upon historians to act as arbiters, defending the proper standards, out of an expectation that the threat of disapproval in the future might discourage incorrect behavior in the present. Historians should call malefactors to account for their misdeeds.
Still others presumed the existence of links between the past and the future and suggested that comprehension of what had taken place might prepare for what will come about. How to get ready for the unknown has always posed a great problem. George Santayana, a Harvard philosopher, asserted early in the twentieth century that people who forget about the past are condemned to repeat it. This utilitarian (实利主义的) conception saw in the discipline a way of developing workable strategies for survival. History comprised the recollections of all people. Santayana’s claim affirmed that things learned from experience could aid in the avoidance of mistakes, pitfalls, and catastrophes in the future.
Henry Ford regarded history as "bunk". This word probably means ______.
选项
A、a narrow bed
B、real knowledge
C、a useful discipline of study
D、nonsense
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8Djd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
GenerationsofAmericanshavebeenbrought【C1】______tobelievethatagoodbreakfastisimportantforhealth.Eatingbreakfasta
GenerationsofAmericanshavebeenbrought【C1】______tobelievethatagoodbreakfastisimportantforhealth.Eatingbreakfasta
GenerationsofAmericanshavebeenbrought【C1】______tobelievethatagoodbreakfastisimportantforhealth.Eatingbreakfasta
MostradioandtelevisionstationsintheUnitedStatesarecommercialstations,【C1】______istosay,theyearntheirmoneyfrom【
BetweentheeighthandeleventhcenturiesA.D.,theByzantineEmpirestagedanalmostunparalleledeconomicandculturalreviva
TextWhenaninventionismade,theinventorhasthreepossiblecoursesofactionopentohim:hecangivetheinventiontot
Onceitwaspossibletodefinemaleandfemaleroleseasilybythedivisionoflabour.Menworkedoutsidethehomeandearnedth
Stinkingbusesjamthecrowdedstreet.Driversshootatoneanotherandhonktheirhorns.Smoghurtstheeyesandchokesthesen
Therearevariouswaysinwhichindividualeconomicunitscaninteractwithoneanother.Threebasicwaysmaybedescribedasma
Travelingcanbefunnyandeasy.Avacationtriptoanotherpartofthecountryisespecially【C1】______whenthetravelingcondit
随机试题
加大生态系统保护力度,实施重要生态系统保护和修复重大工程,优化生态安全屏障体系,构建(),提升生态系统质量和稳定性。
女,32岁,有反复关节红肿病史,心悸、气促,下肢水肿3年。今日因活动后突发呼吸困难,咳粉红色泡沫痰入院。体查:心尖区舒张期隆隆杂音,双肺布满水泡音。心电图示心动过速,二尖瓣型P波。最可能的诊断是
患者,女性,35岁。“黑便3次,晕厥1次。”送至当地医院急诊室。既往有十二指肠溃疡病史。可能存在休克,接诊医生应及时进行哪些一般监测判断病情()
肝性脑病时首选的灌肠药物是()
下列可以用于企业长期偿债能力分析的指标有:()。
隧道监控量测时,测点应安设在距开挖面()m的范围内。
下列各项业务中,不需要通过“固定资产清理”科目核算的是()。
负有缔约过失责任的当事人,应当赔偿受损害的当事人的直接经济损失,对其间接利益的损害则不予赔偿。()
李某假期去秦岭游玩,从甲山到乙山有3条路线,从乙山到丙山有4条路线,从丙山到丁山有2条路线,从甲山经过乙山、丙山到丁山不同走法共有()种。
请你谈谈你报考这个职位有什么优势和劣势?
最新回复
(
0
)