首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How Safe Is Your Cell Phone? It takes a little extra work to get in touch with Andrea Boland. The Maine state representative
How Safe Is Your Cell Phone? It takes a little extra work to get in touch with Andrea Boland. The Maine state representative
admin
2013-07-20
52
问题
How Safe Is Your Cell Phone?
It takes a little extra work to get in touch with Andrea Boland. The Maine state representative answers e-mails and lists her business and home phone numbers on the Web. But unlike many politicians surgically attached to their BlackBerrys, she keeps her cell switched off unless she’s expecting a call. And if she has her way, everyone in Maine—and perhaps, eventually, the rest of the US—will similarly think twice before jabbering (急促含糊地说)away on their mobiles.
In March, Maine’s legislature will begin debating a bill she submitted that would require manufacturers to put a warning label on every cell phone sold in the state declaring, "This device emits electromagnetic radiation, exposure to which may cause brain cancer." Her warning would continue: "Users, especially children and pregnant women, should keep this device away from the head and body."
For those of you now eyeing your cell phones suspiciously, it’s worth noting that both the National Cancer Institute and the World Health Organization say there isn’t evidence to support the assertion that cell phones are a public-health threat. But a number of scientists are worried that there has been a dangerous rush to declare cell phones safe, using studies they feel are inadequate and too often weighted toward the wireless industry’s interests. An analysis published by University of Washington neurologist Henry Lai determined that far more independent studies than industry-funded studies have found at least some type of biological effect from cell-phone exposure.
Several countries—including Finland, Israel and France—have issued guidelines for cell-phone use. And San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who began researching the issue when his wife was expecting their first child, is hoping his city will adopt legislation that would have manufacturers print radiation information on cell-phone packaging and manuals and require retailers to display the data on the sales floor.
With 270 million Americans and 4 billion people around the world using cell phones—and more signing up every day—a strong link between mobiles and cancer could have major public-health implications. As cell phones make and take calls, they emit low-level radio-frequency (RF)radiation. Stronger than FM radio signals, these RF waves are still a billionth the intensity of known carcinogenic (会致癌的)radiation like X-rays.
The wireless industry contends that RF radiation lacks the strength to alter molecules in the human bodys the Federal Communications Commission maximum for cell-phone-signal exposure is intended to prevent RF radiation from heating tissue to the point that cells are damaged. Cell-phone RF radiation’s "effect on the body, at least at this time, appears to be insufficient to produce genetic damage typically associated with developing cancer," Dr. Robert Hoover, director of the National Cancer Institute’s Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, testified at a 2008 congressional hearing.
But the body of research is far from conclusive. In 1995, Lai co-wrote a study showing that a single two-hour exposure of RF radiation—at levels considered safe by the US standards—produced the sort of genetic damage in rats’ brain cells that can lead to cancer. Though subsequent researchers—often funded in part by the wireless industry—failed to replicate Lai’s results, a 2004 European Union-funded study reported similar findings.
Dariusz Leszczynski, a research professor at Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Helsinki, has done studies indicating that RF radiation may create a stress reaction in the cells that line blood vessels, leading to a dangerous damage in the blood-brain barrier. "Mobile-phone radiation may be able to indirectly hurt cells, perhaps by interfering with their ability to repair normal DNA damage," he says. "Given the scientific uncertainty, it’s premature to say the use of cell phones is safe."
If RF radiation increases the chances of developing brain cancer, it should show up in long-term studies of cell-phone users. But many epidemiological studies have found no clear connection, including a 2007 Danish Cancer Society study of 421 000 cell-phone users, which led many in the media to conclude that mobiles are harmless. To date, " peer-reviewed scientific evidence has overwhelmingly indicated that wireless devices do not pose a risk," says John Walls, a spokesman for CTIA, a global wireless association.
There are problems with many of these studies, however. For starters, the Danish one—which reviewed the medical records of people who had signed up for cell phones from 1982 to 1995—didn’t include all the business users, who were among the earliest adopters and most intensive users, because they were not billed directly.
Also, the study looked only at tumors that were diagnosed by 2002—not long after daily use of cell phones became widespread. Brain cancers can take several decades to develop, so it might be many years before a measurable bump in cancer rates shows up. "The latency period we have is far too short," says Dr. Siegal Sadetzki, a cancer researcher at Israel’s Gertner Institute whose epidemiological studies have found some connections between cell-phone use and salivary-gland (唾液腺)tumors. "And today, people are using the phone much more heavily."
Sadetzki served as Israel’s principal investigator in the Interphone study, which was conducted over the past several years by 13 countries, most of them European. The Interphone results initially were to be published in 2006, but the final report has been postponed repeatedly, and the study investigators are reportedly deeply divided. In the US, which isn’t one of the Interphone countries, the National Toxicology Program is launching studies of the health effects of cell phones. But peer-reviewed results won’t be available until at least 2014.
That’s a long time to wait for definitive data. The good news is that there are easy ways for those concerned about RF radiation to cut down on exposure. Using your cell phone’s speaker or connecting a wired headset—while keeping the handset away from your body—drastically reduces RF exposure. (Bluetooth headsets help too, but they still emit some radiation.)And given the potentially more serious risks for children, who have thinner skulls than adults, parents might want to wait before handing teens their first phone—or at least ensure they use it mostly for texting.
Meanwhile, a start-up, Pong Research, is selling cell-phone cases that significantly reduce radiation exposure by channeling waves away from the head. "I think it’s best to avoid as much of the risk as possible until the verdict is in," says Alfred Wong, Pong’s chief scientist and a professor emeritus of physics at UCLA.
That’s exactly what Boland and other advocates of warning labels are arguing. It’s true that cell-phone use has yet to be linked to cancer risk. "Scientifically speaking, we don’t have the proof yet," says Sadetzki. "But as a public-health concern, I’m saying we definitely should adopt precautions."
The RF waves are a kind of radiation that is______.
选项
A、strong enough to cause cancers
B、weaker than FM radio signals
C、slightly weaker than X-rays
D、at a relatively low level
答案
D
解析
细节推断题。由定位句可知,RF辐射要比调频无线电信号强,但是其强度只有已知致癌辐射(如X射线)的十亿分之一,因此RF辐射应当相对较弱,故答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8dn7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Parentsareoftenupsetwhentheirchildrenpraisethehomesoftheirfriendsandregarditasaslur(诽谤,中伤)ontheirowncooki
Foryearsthemedia,foodlabels,dietitians,andevenscientistswhoshouldknowbetterhavebombarded(轰炸)uswithadvicetol
A、Theyaffectone’swayoflookingattheworld.B、Theymakepeoplefeellonelyandunwanted.C、Theyaffectone’shealthconditi
Twogroupsofscientistsdemonstratedlastweekforthefirsttimethatthebodylaunchesamassive,effectivecounter-attackon
A、Heisworriedthathissonmightfail.B、Hewillsufferfromalotofpressure.C、Hewantshissontohaveahappychildhood.
He’slyingtherewithoutsayinganything;______(与其说他累了倒不如说他饿了).
A、Sheisworriedaboutthesafetyinthosecountries.B、Sheisalittleworriedaboutherhealth.C、Sheisafraidshewillspend
What’syourearliestchildhoodmemory?Canyourememberlearningtowalk?Ortalk?Thefirsttimeyou【C1】______thunderorwatch
Thestalledeconomy,expirationofhomebuyertaxcredits,marked-downhomeprices,stubbornlyhighunemploymentandconcernsabo
随机试题
根据诗词上句补充下句。__________,牧童遥指杏花村。
A.Itiswidelyacceptedthattheculturalindustryhasbeenoneofthekeyindustriesindevelopedcountries.B.Nomatterhow
下列关于唾液分泌调节的描述,正确的是
关于全国人大代表和省、自治区人大代表的名额,按照农村每一代表所代表的人口数4倍于城市每一代表所代表的人口数的原则分配的规定,下列哪一说法是错误的?(2009—卷一—19,单)
根据我国宪法和港、澳基本法规定,关于港、澳基本法的修改,下列哪一选项是不正确的?(2011年卷一26题)
在寒冷和严寒地区隧道衬砌比较容易发生的一类病害是()。
甲与乙签订了仓储合同,约定由乙储存甲交付的材料。合同履行期间,乙方保管员在一次盘库中发现,为甲保管的材料与仓储合同约定的数量和质量不符,不仅数量不足,而且品质下降。对此,下列关于甲、乙双方权利和义务的表述中错误的是()。
在下列情况中,注册会计师不可以出具带有强调事项段的无保留意见审计报告的有()。
一、注意事项1.申论考试是对考生阅读理解能力、综合分析能力、提出和解决问题能力、文字表达能力的测试。2.本试卷由给定资料与作答要求两部分构成。考试时限为150分钟。其中,阅读给定资料参考时限为40分钟,作答参考时限为110分钟。满分100分
刑警王某从某个杀人现场勘察完毕回到局里。门卫老张问他结果怎么样,王某说知道了杀人犯到过现场。老张知道王刑警在调侃他,因为根本无须王某告诉,他就知道:如果某人是杀人犯,那么案发时他一定在现场。但据此回答,我们可以推知()
最新回复
(
0
)