首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
admin
2012-12-14
74
问题
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies working to hugely ambitious growth targets with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to long-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term "innovation" may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance, not all of which are well understood.
Take "type" of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take "degree". Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something "New! Improved!"? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, "innovation" is often just "simple proliferation of similar products". Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners a better approach? In larger organisations, has senior management really made time spent in cross-functional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg. payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it "celebrate failure", for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report) ?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen "by accident". Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill. We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say "these people have mastered the art of innovation"? Brilliant innovation is a wonderful thing. Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
According to the fourth paragraph, companies should ensure that______.
选项
A、their approach to risk management is fully new
B、the progress of an innovation is as speedy as possible
C、their new products are radically different from competitors’
D、the benefits of participating in teamwork are fully acknowledged
答案
D
解析
由第四段中,“in larger organizations,has senior management really made timespent in cross-functional teams a recognizedelement of successful career paths?可知,高级管理人员把精力用在被认为是事业成功途径的重要元素——团队组织上。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9Q7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whattypeofbusinessisthemanmostlikelycalling?
WhattypeofbusinessisMegan’sThreads?
Whattypeofservicedoesthecompanymostlikelyprovide?
Lookatthegraphic.Whatcolorpaintwillthewomanmostlikelychoose?
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.YouhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfrOmtheth
Askingquestions征询
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
Practisediscussingthistask,andthequestionswhichfollowit,withapartner:STAFFTRAININGREVIEWTheorganisationyouwor
•Youwillhearfivebusinesspeoplediscussinghowtobecomeatrueleader.•Foreachextracttherearetwotasks.ForTaskOne,
随机试题
下列属于鲁迅杂文集的是()
下列哪项不是急性心肌梗死的体征
A.血尿B.血红蛋白尿C.肌红蛋白尿D.卟啉尿E.药物性红尿马,7岁,营养良好,半月余未参加任何活动,参加比赛后24小时发病,后肢瘫痪,排红色尿液。最可能的红尿性质是()
A.独活B.黄芩C.细辛D.知母E.前胡属于小青龙汤组成药物的是
某市政工程基础采用明挖基坑施工,坑壁采用网喷混凝土加固。A公司中标后把基坑部分擅自分包给不具备安全资质的B公司。B公司开挖施工时把大量挖土弃置于基坑顶部,建设单位及监理单位发现后对B公司劝阻,但B公司不予理会;基坑施工时为加快进度,B公司采用了一次开挖到底
某工程施工合同约定2004年1月1日业主应向承包商支付工程款,如果承包商一直没有提出索要工程款的要求,业主也没有主动提出同意支付工程款,则()。
放行是检验检疫机构对列入法定检验检疫的出入境货物出具规定的证件,表示准予出入境并由海关监管验放的一种行政执法行为。( )
UKhouseholdsarecuttingbackonspendingatthefastestratesince1980.Thisiscontributingtotheworsteconomicslowdowni
Access表由【】和【】两部分构成。
AllChange[A]Thebasicmodeloftheelectricityindustrywastosendhighvoltagesoverlongdistancestopassivecustomers.Po
最新回复
(
0
)