首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
admin
2020-11-04
27
问题
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy
[A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, something retail analysts have known for years is now apparent to everyone: The online retailer is on a collision course with Walmart to try to be the predominant seller of pretty much everything you buy. Each one is trying to become more like the other—Walmart by investing heavily in its technology, Amazon by opening physical bookstores and now buying physical supermarkets. But this is more than a battle between two business titans. Their rivalry sheds light on the shifting economics of nearly every major industry.
[B] That in turn has been a boon(福音)for consumers but also has more worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality. To understand this epic shift, you can look not just to the grocery business, but also to my closet, and to another retail acquisition announced Friday morning.
[C] Men’s dress clothing, mine included, can be a little boring. Like many male office workers, I lean toward clothes that are sharp but not at all showy. Nearly every weekday, I wear a dress shirt that is either light blue, white or has some subtle check pattern, usually paired with slacks and a blazer. The description alone could make a person doze. I used to buy my dress shirts from a Hong Kong tailor. They fit perfectly, but ordering required an awkward meeting with a visiting salesman in a hotel suite. They took six weeks to arrive, and they cost around $ 120 each, which adds up fast when you need to buy eight or 10 a year to keep up with wear and tear(破损). Then several years ago I realized that a company called Bonobos was making shirts that fit me nearly as well, that were often sold three for $ 220, or $ 73 each, and that would arrive in two days.
[D] Bonobos became my main shirt provider, at least until recently, when I learned that Amazon was trying to get into the upper-end men’s shirt game. The firm’s " Buttoned Down" line, offered to Amazon Prime customers, uses high-quality fabric and is a good value at $ 40 for basic shirts. I bought a few: they don’t fit me quite as well as the Bonobos, but I do prefer the stitching(针脚). I’m on the fence as to which company will provide my next shirt order, and a new deal this week makes it interesting: Walmart is buying Bonobos. Walmart’s move might seem a strange decision. It is not a retailer people typically turn to for $ 88 summer weight shirts in Ruby Wynwood Plaid or $ 750 Italian wool suits. Then again, Amazon is best known as a reseller of goods made by others.
[E] Walmart and Amazon have had their sights on each other for years, each aiming to be the dominant seller of goods—however consumers of the future want to buy them. It increasingly looks like that " however" is a hybrid of physical stores and online-ordering channels, and each company is coming at the goal from a different starting point.
[F] Amazon is the dominant player in online sales, and is particularly strong among affluent consumers in major cities. It is now experimenting with physical bookstores and groceries as it looks to broaden its reach. Walmart has thousands of stores that sell hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. It is particularly strong in suburban and rural areas and among low- and middle-income consumers, but it’s playing catch-up with online sales and affluent urbanites.
[G] Why are these two mega-retailers both trying to sell me shirts? The short answer is because they both want to sell everything. More specifically, Bonobos is known as an innovator in exactly this type of hybrid of online and physical store sales. Its website and online customer service are excellent, and it operates stores in major cities where you can try on garments and order items to be shipped directly. Because all the actual inventory is centralized, the stores themselves can occupy minimal square footage. So the acquisition may help Walmart build expertise in the very areas where it is trying to gain on Amazon. You can look at the Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods through the same lens. The grocery business has a whole different set of challenges from the types of goods that Amazon has specialized in: you can’t store a steak or a banana the way you do books or toys. And people want to be able to make purchases and take them home on the spur of the moment.
[H] Just as Walmart is using Bonobos to get access to higher-end consumers and a more technologically savvy way of selling clothes, Amazon is using Whole Foods to get the expertise and physical presence it takes to sell fresh foods. But bigger dimensions of the modern economy also come into play.
[I] The apparel business has long been a highly competitive industry in which countless players could find a niche(商机). Any insight that one shirt-maker developed could be rapidly copied by others, and consumer prices reflected the retailer’s real estate costs and branding approach as much as anything. That helps explain why there are thousands of options worldwide for someone who wants a decent-quality men’s shirt. In that world, any shirt-maker that tried to get too big rapidly faced diminishing returns. It would have to pay more and more to lease the real estate for far-flung stores, and would have to outbid competitors to hire all the experienced shirt-makers. The expansion wouldn’t offer any meaningful cost savings and would entail a lot more headaches trying to manage it all.
[J] But more and more businesses in the modern economy, rather than reflecting those diminishing returns to scale, show positive returns to scale: The biggest companies have a huge advantage over smaller players. That tends to tilt markets toward a handful of players or even a monopoly, rather than an even playing field with countless competitors.
[K] The most extreme example of this would be the software business, where a company can invest bottomless sums in a piece of software, but then sell it to each additional customer for practically nothing. The apparel industry isn’t that extreme—the price of making a shirt is still linked to the cost of fabric and the workers to do the stitching—but it is moving in that direction. And that helps explain why Walmart and Amazon are so eager to put a shirt on my back.
[L] Already, retailers need to figure out how to manage sophisticated supply chains connecting Southeast Asia with stores in big American cities so that they rarely run out of product. They need mobile apps and websites that offer a seamless user experience so that nothing stands between a would-be purchaser and an order. Larger companies that are good at supply chain management and technology can spread those more-or-less fixed costs around more total sales, enabling them to keep prices lower than a niche player and entrench their advantage.
[M] These positive returns to scale could become even more pronounced. Perhaps in the future, rather than manufacture a bunch of shirts in Indonesia and Malaysia and ship them to the United States to be sold one at a time to urban office workers, a company will have a robot manufacture shirts to my specifications somewhere nearby.
[N] If that’s the future of clothing, and quite a few companies are working on just that, apparel will become a landscape of high fixed costs and enormous returns to scale. The handful of companies with the very best shirt-making robots will win the market, and any company that can’t afford to develop shirt-making robots, or isn’t very good at it, might find itself left in the cold.
Traditionally, Amazon is popular among consumers in big cities while Walmart is widely located in rural areas.
选项
答案
F
解析
[F]段提到,亚马逊备受大城市的富有人群喜爱,而沃尔玛更受偏远地区和郊区的中低收入人群钟爱。题干中的in big cities和in rural areas分别对应定位句中的in major cities和in suburban and rural areas,故选[F]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BkP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Theyarefocusedmoreonattractionthanlove.B、TheyweredonebyhisformercolleagueatYale.C、Theywerecarriedoutover
A、Itisourdutytomakeitrightinourownbackyard.B、Theworldpeacestartshouseholdbyhousehold.C、Itisanewideathat
InequalityIsNotInevitable[A]Adangeroustrendhasdevelopedoverthispastthirdofacentury.Acountrythatexperiencedsh
Facebookiscrackingdownoncryptocurrencies(加密数字货币)byusingoneofitsmostpowerfultools:accesstoitsmassiveadvertisin
Facebookiscrackingdownoncryptocurrencies(加密数字货币)byusingoneofitsmostpowerfultools:accesstoitsmassiveadvertisin
珠穆朗玛峰(MountEverest)位于中国和尼泊尔(Nepal)两国边界上。在藏语中的意思是“第三女神”。它海拔8844.43米,是喜马拉雅山(theHimalayaMountains)的主峰,也是世界上最高的山峰。登上珠穆朗玛峰顶峰,一直是各国
调节
农历五月初五是中国民间的传统节日——端午节。关于端午节的由来,说法甚多。根据古籍记载,端午节最早是中国古代南方吴越民族举行图腾祭祀的节日,比纪念屈原更早。但千百年来,屈原的爱国精神和感人诗作已广泛深入人心,故人们“惜而哀之世论其辞,以相传焉”。因此,纪
《证券公司为期货公司提供中间介绍业务试行办法》规定,券商申请介绍业务资格,其风险控制指标中净资本不低于()亿元。
随机试题
A、距根尖端1.5mm,根尖部根管内无任何X线透射影像B、在距根尖端5mm处从近中侧穿,根尖部根管内无根充物C、齐根尖端,根尖部近根管壁处有线状X线透射影像D、出根尖孔约1.5mm,根尖部根管内无任何X线透射影像E、仅在一个根管内,另一根根管
下列关于未成年人诉讼程序的说法正确的是:()
城市污水处理设施建设,应按照( )确定最终规模,以( )为主要依据确定近期规模。
关于费用特点的说法,正确的是()。
利用布莱克一斯科尔斯期权定价模型估算期权价值时,下列表述正确的有()。
甲科技公司(以下简称甲公司)开发出一种新型保健技术,为将该技术转化为产品,甲公司与乙企业签订了技术合同。合同约定:资金、设备、材料等物质条件由乙企业提供,研究开发工作全部由甲公司负责。为使开发顺利进行,乙企业决定投资兴建一座新技术试验楼。经过必要的程序,乙
下列选项中,不属于中国四大石窟的是()。
根据法律法规内容的不同,我国的教育法规可分为()。
下面程序段的功能是:在数据库中判断是否存在名为my_proe的存储过程,若存在,则删除之,然后创建同名的存储过程,该存储过程的功能是向author_id、author_name和address字段插入数据。阅读并回答以下问题:USEbookdbG
下列叙述中正确的是
最新回复
(
0
)