首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
admin
2016-10-24
44
问题
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a list of the significant donors to the Conservative Party who had dined at No 10. By mid-morning, the Prime Minister had bowed to the pressure of the inevitable.and details of four dinners were duly released. Quite right, too.
Mr. Cameron claims to want to lead the most transparent and open government in the world. But the reality has been all too different, the most substantial progress is made only when the Prime Minister has a gun to his head.
Rules ensuring that ministers log all meetings with media executives, for example, were only put in place after the uproar over phone hacking had claimed the News of the World and led to the creation of the Leveson Inquiry. Given that the cozy relations between Government and media would unavoidably feature in the hearings, Mr. Cameron’s move was less a sign of a heartfelt commitment to openness than a pre-emptive strike(预防性打击).
Similarly, proposals to set up a register of lobbyists had all but stalled until this newspaper’s investigation revealed Bell Pottinger executives soliciting for business from a repressive government, boasting about their links with the Conservative high command and claiming that clients’ "messages" would get through to top advisers.
And it is only now—in an attempt to head off the scandal over Peter Crudda’s crude selling of access and influence—that Mr. Cameron has grudgingly revealed his dinner dates with major benefactors and set out rules that ministers meeting with party donors must report any discussions of policy to their Permanent Secretaries.
Mr. Cameron’s ill-judged uncommunicativeness alone would have added to suspicions of impropriety. But it is his supporters’ efforts to explain his reluctance——with false distinctions between public and private dinners, between meals and that take place in Downing Street or elsewhere, between public and private dinners, between those at Mr. Cameron’s expense and those not—that really make the case for complete openness in all matters relating to access to the Prime Minister.
A central claim is that the Downing Street flat is a private home and that any activities there should therefore be inviolable. The assertion is a ridiculous one. The flat is the residence of the British Prime Minister. It cannot be argued that simply because food is served upstairs rather than downstairs there is no cause for concern.
Quite the reverse, in fact. So long as large sums of money are changing hands, the implication of influence bought is unavoidable;even more so, if the meetings are informal. Indeed, the two-step over Mr. Cameron’s supper companions has only added to the sense of government-by-inner-group, of a blurred world of friendship and influence accessible to those with money to pay. It is up to the Prime Minister to dispel such damaging impressions forthwith.
Ultimately, there is but one remedy: take the big money out of politics. Previous attempts to cap donations have fallen foul of the three main parties’ inability to agree. But the Cruddas scandal may yet tip the balance, and Francis Maude, a senior Tory minister, yesterday announced plans for quick cross-party talks on reform.
In the meantime, it is obligatory upon Mr. Cameron to establish an immediate policy of absolute transparency. That means not simply a list of dinners with donors. It means every engagement of any kind must be put into the public domain. The sacrifice of his personal privacy is a small price to pay to guarantee the incorruptibility of the highest office of the land.
Which of the following is the best possible title of the passage?
选项
A、Absolute transparency—the only solution.
B、Downing Street:a world of power and wealth.
C、Necessity of a leader’s faithful supporters.
D、Controversies in Cameron’s cabinet.
答案
A
解析
以下哪个标题可能是最佳标题?绝对透明:唯一的解决方案。这道主旨题的答案可在末段找到。作者在最后一段说,卡梅伦先生有义务立刻制定绝对透明的政策。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/D3GO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Chooseoneappropriatewordfromthefollowingwordbanktofillintheblanksnumberedfrom1to15inthepassagebelow.Chang
Chooseoneappropriatewordfromthefollowingwordbanktofillintheblanksnumberedfrom1to15inthepassagebelow.Chang
Chooseoneappropriatewordfromthefollowingwordbanktofillintheblanksnumberedfrom1to15inthepassagebelow.Chang
Mostsmallearthquakeswhichcauseveryslight______canonlybedetectedwiththehelpofsophisticatedinstruments.
Wehaveknownforalongtimethattheorganizationofanyparticularsocietyisinfluencedbythedefinitionofthesexesandt
Signhasbecomeascientifichotbutton.Onlyinthepast20yearshavespecialistsinlanguagestudyrealizedthatsignedlangu
Signhasbecomeascientifichotbutton.Onlyinthepast20yearshavespecialistsinlanguagestudyrealizedthatsignedlangu
Despitethefactthattodayvirusareknowntocausecancerinanimalsandinplants,thereexistsagreatreluctancetoaccept
Asregardstothedevelopmentofmoralstandardsinthegrowingchild,______isveryimportantinparentalteaching.Toforbid
A"scientific"viewoflanguagewasdominantamongphilosophersandlinguistswhoaffectedtodevelopascientificanalysisof
随机试题
哪个检查窗主要用于显示左、右椎动脉及两者汇聚而成的基底动脉
某女,35岁。胃痛胀满,嗳腐恶食,矢气后痛减,医生辨为饮食停滞,治宜选用的中成药
不干涉内政原则是国际法的一项基本原则,下列关于内政的说法错误的有:()
仓储按其经营主体划分,以下()类型不在此划分范围。
上市公司通过()等形式向投资者披露其经营状况的有关信息。
2015年12月10日,甲公司购入乙公司股票10万股,将其划分为交易性金融资产,购买日支付价款249万元,另支付交易费用0.6万元,2015年12月31日,该股票的公允价值为258万元,不考虑其他因素,甲公司2015年度利润表“公允价值变动收益”项目本期金
某横排图书的正义主体文字确定用五号宋体。据此,该书版式设计方案中设计合理的项目有()等。
始建于17世纪的别墅风格别具特色。且已知下面的线索:(1)N属于赵,2号房产在该栋别墅之后建造,且与其建造时间相邻。(2)张拥有的别墅,沿顺时针方向与M建筑相邻,而后者至今仍然是一家酒吧。(3)李那栋始建于1685年的别墅不是O。(4)在最东面的不
(1)是固化在主板ROM内的程序,为计算机提供最底层、最直接的硬件访问和控制。
InEurope,______werethefirsttousetheumbrellaasasunshade.
最新回复
(
0
)