首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-01-19
78
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specially, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______.
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/D8xd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Itwasin1812,inavillageinFrance.Alittleboytrippedandfellwithpointedtoolsinhishand.Inthataccidenthebecame
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
【61】Itisawell-knownfactthatthereareconstantconflictsamongdifferentgroupsofpeople,andthatpeopletendtoblamet
【61】Itisawell-knownfactthatthereareconstantconflictsamongdifferentgroupsofpeople,andthatpeopletendtoblamet
Tobesuccessfulinajobinterview,youshouldtakecaretoappearmodestlydressed,avoidingtheextremesoftooelaborateor
WhatisSaffoaccordingtohimself?
WhatisSaffoaccordingtohimself?
随机试题
引起间质性肺炎的病原体有()
早期法家的代表人物之一是()
软组织神经源性肿瘤的MRI表现,错误的是
患儿5岁,冬季发病,症见恶寒,发热,无汗,鼻塞,流涕,喷嚏,咳嗽,头痛,喉痒,舌苔白,脉浮紧,治疗首选方剂是
“血之余”是指
铁路隧道明洞的外边墙基础深度超过路基面以下()m时,宜设置横向拉杆或用锚杆锚固于稳定的岩层内。
甲为某公司的法定代表人,某日与材料商乙签订了一份采购合同。按照公司章程的规定,甲已经超越了其法人对其代表权限的限制,但是,乙却不知情,则该合同()。
不属于借款人情况检查的内容的是()。
特许权使用费所得包括()。
案例一日,某老师收到一位学生的来信,信上说:“我这人整天不高兴,觉得自己每天都碌碌无为,而且还会给别人造成麻烦,我的性格比较内向,也不太爱说话,其实我也想像别人一样性格开朗,善于言谈,但我不知道该和同学们说什么,我想说的,我所想的,我觉得与其他同学不一
最新回复
(
0
)