首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Google may be valued at more than $185 billion and boast millions of users, but that doesn’t mean the Internet giant is any matc
Google may be valued at more than $185 billion and boast millions of users, but that doesn’t mean the Internet giant is any matc
admin
2020-05-01
23
问题
Google may be valued at more than $185 billion and boast millions of users, but that doesn’t mean the Internet giant is any match for the diminutive French President Nicolas Sarkozy. On Dec. 8, Sarkozy warned Google he would not allow France to be "stripped" of its literary heritage, an apparent reference to Google’s enormous book-digitizing project. "We won’t let ourselves be stripped of our heritage to the benefit of a big company, no matter how friendly, big or American it is," Sarkozy said during a round-table discussion in eastern France. "We are not going to be stripped of what generations and generations have produced in the French language, just because we weren’t capable of funding our own digitization project."
Sarkozy’s oratorical histrionics are becoming a regular occurrence. But the French President isn’t the only European David ready to stand up to the Internet Goliath and its formidable archiving project. Last October, German Chancellor Angela Merkel reiterated concerns held by many German publishers. The German government, she said, rejected "the scanning of books without any copyright protection like Google is doing. We refuse to permit simple scanning of books without full protection of intellectual-property rights." The French and German complaints are part of a growing move in the European Union to head off Google’s mass digitization of literature. "It is not up to any individual organization to determine policy on a matter as important as the digitization of our global heritage," French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand told the Journal du Dimanche following a meeting of his E.U. peers in late November to discuss a united, state-led approach to the matter. "I’m not going to leave this issue up to simple laissez-faire."
Google has already digitized some 10 million books—most of them "public domain" works that are out of print, or books whose copyright owners are unknown. Google’s strategy thus far appears to have been to scan first, and deal with any copyright issues later—a method that worries authors and publishers. Justice authorities in the U.S. and in Europe have warned Google that it should not secure a monopoly position that would allow it to single-handedly dictate how much the public must pay to access many of the world’s great books.
Google and its backers—which include industrial partner Sony as well as libraries in the U.S. and Europe—argue that the company brings rare books often only obtainable by students, scholars and researchers to the general public online for free. It says it’s also setting aside funding to pay to unknown copyright owners who step up and ask for
remuneration
, or remove works by those who don’t want to be in Google’s archive.
Opponents—these include several European governments and publishers, and the Open Access Alliance formed by authors and Google rivals like Yahoo! and Microsoft — describe that as a kind of massive, literary landgrab which ignores copyright concerns until owners demand they be paid or their books removed. They also fear Google’s initially free search-and-access service will give way to a pay scheme. Confusing matters further, libraries, publishers and writers in both the U.S. and Europe are split in pro- and anti-Google Book camps.
The California-based giant has already made some concessions to publishers. Under a pending settlement reached with U.S. publishers’ groups, Google has agreed to limit its archiving to works that have been registered in the U.S., or come from the U.K., Australia, and Canada—English-speaking countries whose authors are present in American libraries. That agreement would nominally exclude books from countries like France and Germany, and from China, which has also objected to the digitization project on copyright grounds. Still, the accord must be approved by a U.S. federal court review in February—not a slam-dunk affair, given the American Justice Department’s concerns that the agreement still breaks "fundamental copyright principles".
Google has another court date it is preparing for. Paris publishing group La Martiniere took Google to court after it discovered the firm had scanned and archived books on which La Martiniere holds the copyright. It’s asking for $15 million in damages for the violation. If it wins—a ruling is expected on Dec. 18—the case will help set an important legal precedent on Google’s approach. Google France declined to comment on the court case, but noted its scanning work with 30 libraries and 30,000 private publishers has provoked little legal challenge. Could that change soon? "We feel confident we’ll win on the most important legal points in this case, which is important to establish precedent awaiting the U.S. hearing in February," notes Tessa Destais, an adviser to La Martiniere. "We’re not anti-Google—it’s a wonderful company. We’re simply insisting it obey copyright laws, and start negotiating with publishers as partners."
Which of the following is NOT an opponent of Google?
选项
A、China
B、Yahoo!
C、European publishers
D、The Open Access Alliance
答案
A
解析
事实题。由第五段可知,选项A不是谷歌公司的反对者。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DMbK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AudienceAwarenessofWritingI.Introduction—contents,【T1】______andstylesdependontheaudience【T1】______—theimportance
ThePurposesofLiteraryAnalysisI.IntroductionLiteraryanalysisisinitselfauniversalnecessity.—reason1:enablesrea
A、Itinvolves$1.5billioninvestmenttoupgradebridges.B、Itinvolvesplansoftransportingthestaffeasilytotheairports.
A、Toaskstudentstowriteasimilarletterusingoneofthemodels.B、Togivestudentspracticecomplainingintheclassroom.C
PASSAGETWOWhatisthispassagemainlyabout?
Literature,especially【T1】______,givespeopleagreaterappreciationforhistoryinanon-historicalway.【T2】______remainthe
A、Toinsurethatsheisagoodparent.B、Toinsurethatsheisingoodhealth.C、ToconductpsychologicalevaluationsonDavid.
Itisaknownfactthatphysicalactivityimprovesoverallhealth.Notonlydoesitimprovecirculation,increasebloodflowto
Atradegroupforliquorretailersputoutapressreleasewithanalarmingheadline;"MillionsofKidsBuyInternetAlcohol,
NoEnglishmanbelievesinworkingfrombooklearning.Hesuspectseverythingnew,anddislikesit,unlesshecanbecompelledb
随机试题
《民法典》第122条。请分析:受损失的人不得请求得利人返还获得的利益的主要情形有哪些?
下列指标可在呼吸机面板上直接测定并显示的是
患儿,男,8个月。口腔舌面满布白屑,色白如雪片,白屑周围有红晕,色微红,互相粘连,随拭随生,不易清除。其诊断是
某建筑公司与某单位于5月10日签订了实验楼承建合同,合同约定由于甲方责任造成总工期延误1d,甲方应向乙方补偿1万元;若乙方延误总工期1d应扣除乙方工程款1万元;施工中实际工程量超过计划工程量10%以上时超过部分按原单价的90%计算;双方对施工进度网络计划确
企业银行存款的账面余额与银行对账单余额因未达账项存在差额时,应按照银行存款余额调节表调整银行存款日记账。()
配送需求研究涉及下列哪些方面?()
如果可以,机器人甚至能挽救你的生命。以自动驾驶汽车为例,美国近年来年均车祸致死量高达13000人,自动驾驶汽车至少能够降低因醉酒和走神导致的车祸数量。然而大部分美国人声称,乘坐自动驾驶的交通工具会让他们感觉不适。若此类想法得不到改变,科技的发展必然受阻。事
甲、乙、丙、丁、戊、己、庚七人表演配乐诗朗诵,为了确保表演效果,需要安排朗诵顺序。已知下列条件:①甲要么第一个朗诵,要么最后一个朗诵。②乙和丙之间有三人。③丁和戊之间有三人,且丁先朗诵。④丁在乙之前朗诵。根据上述条件,以下哪项可能为真?
Whichofthefollowingcanreflecttheever-changingethnicstructureofAmerica?WhoplayprofessionalfootballintheUnited
WhytheSuper-RichAren’tLeavingMuchofTheirFortunestoTheirKidsA)WhatdoSting,BillGatesandWarrenBuffetthaveinco
最新回复
(
0
)