首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
admin
2017-12-31
65
问题
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the number of workers who own shares in the business that employs them has never been higher. America leads the way: 32m Americans own stock in their companies through pension and profit-sharing plans, and share-ownership and share-option schemes. The idea continues to gain momentum. Hillary Clinton’s recent speeches suggest that she may make it an important plank in her plans to reform capitalism. And worker-capitalists are also on the march everywhere.
Conservatives like employee ownership because it gives workers a stake in the capitalist system. Left-wingers like it because it gives them a piece of the capitalist pie. And middle-of-the-roaders like it because it helps to close a potentially dangerous gap between capital and labour. Britain’s David Cameron praises John Lewis, a retailer entirely owned by its staff. Bernie Sanders, America’s only socialist senator and now a candidate for the Democratic nomination, is a champion of employee share-ownership.
The trend is also being driven by a long-term shift from "defined benefit"(DB)pension plans, in which employers guarantee the retirement income of their workers, to "defined contribution"(DC)schemes, in which workers and employers put money into an investment pot, with no guarantees of how much it will eventually pay out. Including current workers and pensioners there are more than 88m DC plans in existence. A 2013 survey by Aon Hewitt, a consulting firm, found that 14% of such plans’ assets were invested in the shares of the employer in question.
A number of studies have found that workers at firms where employees have a significant stake tend to be more productive and innovative, and to have less staff turnover. Employee ownership has its drawbacks, however. One is the risk that workers have too many eggs in one basket: if their employer goes bust they can lose their pensions as well as their jobs. Just before Enron went bankrupt in 2001 the average employee held 62% of his or her 401(k)assets in Enron shares. Despite various initiatives by Congress to stop firms touting their shares to employees, similar cases are still arising.
A second problem is entrenchment. Supporters of worker ownership argue that it helps companies take a more long-term perspective. Critics argue that it can entrench bad management and undermine a company’s long-term competitiveness: underperforming bosses are much more likely to be able to stay in place, and resist hostile takeovers, if some of the company’s shares are in friendly hands. In 1994 United Airlines handed many of its workers a 55% stake, and representation on the board, in return for pay cuts. But its performance remained poor, and it filed for bankruptcy in 2002.
A third risk is entitlement. The strongest argument in favour of employee ownership is that workers will not only toil harder if they get a slice of the profits, but will make sure that their colleagues do so too. A new paper by Benjamin Dunford and others, argues that commitment can transmute into entitlement. The academics studied a sample of 409 employees at a commercial-property firm in the Midwest and found that those who invested a higher proportion of their 401(k)accounts in company stock expected better benefits than the rest, and took more discretionary leave.(However, the study did not consider whether employee ownership boosted the firm’s overall performance.)
Arguments about employee ownership can easily become too sweeping: grand claims from supporters invite vigorous rebuttals by critics. A great deal depends on how schemes are structured, and the motives for introducing them. Another recent paper, by Han Kim and Paige Ouimet, considers the sizes of ESOPs and of the firms that offer them. They find that small ESOPs(which control a stake of less than 5 % in the company in question)are far more likely to boost productivity than large ones, because firms that introduce large ESOPs are often troubled ones trying to conserve cash by substituting shares for pay, or seeking to fend off hostile takeovers by giving shares to friendly insiders. They also argue that ESOPs are much more likely to work in smaller firms than larger ones because employee-owners can more easily monitor each other and boost overall productivity.
There is plenty to be said for employee ownership. It can sharpen workers’ motivation and go some way to healing a potentially dangerous divide between the working class and the boss class. But if politicians are serious about the idea, they need to think harder about how to make it work in practice. They should pay closer attention to how schemes are designed, and look for ways to tailor regulations and tax incentives so as to encourage well-designed schemes. They also need to deal with the problem of concentrating risk in a single company’ s shares. Given that the average life expectancy of Fortune 500 companies has fallen from 75 years in the 1930s to perhaps just 15 years today, encouraging employees to invest their savings with the companies that employ them is a recipe for miserable retirements.
In what way does the author say that the gap between capitalists and workers is shrinking? What is employee ownership?
选项
答案
with more workers who own shares "in the business that employs them"/ in a sense, they become the "owners" of the business + become the capitalists who own the business / they might earn more from such shares / gain profits from the shares they own as the capitalists do / therefore the gap between the two might be "shrinking" / "profit-sharing plans" / employee ownership: many American businesses let their employees own stock/shares in a number of ways /in a sense they are considered "owners" of the business / thus the system is called "employee ownership"
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/E0SO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
SurveysinBritainandAmericaconsistentlyshowthatthebiggestworryparentshavefortheirschool-agechildreniswhatthey
However,whatisagonizingandunbearableistheduplicityandinsincerityofthesemediawhorefusedtocriticizetheGermanpo
Healthsystemsstrengthening—which,inglobalhealthspeak,meansbuildingandreinforcingthestaff—mustcontinuetotakeplace
AlthoughothernationscontributedtoNorthSeapollution,muchofthecontaminationwastracedbacktoBritain.
Thebirthofachildisatimeofhope.Itsnewlifeisasymbolofpotentialforgrowth.Itsdeathisadenialofprogress.Whe
A、Lifeexpectancyisanimportantindexintheranking.B、Povertyratesandprogressforwomensuggestthatrichnationsarerel
WhatdoestheBeijingOrganizingCommitteefortheOlympicGamesplantodotosolvetheproblemscausedbycarboom?
随机试题
IntheUnitedStates,elementaryandmiddleschoolsareadvisedtogivestudentstwoandahalfhoursofphysicalactivityawee
关于典型心绞痛以下错误的是()
男孩,6岁。因发热2周,头痛伴呕吐3天,惊厥1次入院。疑诊结核性脑膜炎。入院次日,患儿突然心率增快,呼吸节律不整,双瞳孔不等大,错误的处理是
无业人员甲通过伪造国家机关公文,骗取某县工商局副局长的职位。在该局股级干部竞争上岗时,甲向干部乙声称:“如果不给我2万元,你这次绝对没有机会。”乙为获得岗位。只好送甲2万元。关于对甲的行为的处理意见,下列哪一选项是正确的?()(2007年卷二第19
要约邀请不是合同成立过程中的必经过程,下列属于要约邀请的是( )。
某企业的12月31日资产负债表中资产有8000万元,所有者权益有5000万元,那么其负债有()万元。
证券公司应当于每个交易日21:00前向交易所报送当日各标的证券融资买入额、融资还款额、融资余额、融券卖出量、融券偿还量以及融券余量等数据。()
初二学生李阳最近沉迷于电子游戏,经常无心上课,上课时精神萎靡不振,逃课现象严重,作业迟交或不交。班主任徐老师在屡次说教无果之后,改用上课时间罚站、罚跑、留校等方式进行惩罚。学校领导考虑到将来的升学率,将其从学校重点班级调回到普通班级。调回到普通班级以后,李
1980年2月,第五届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议通过了中华人民共和国成立后由最高权力机关制定的第一部有关教育的法律。这部法律是()。
Themedicineworksmoreeffectivelyyoudrinksomehotwateraftertakingit.
最新回复
(
0
)