首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
admin
2017-12-31
35
问题
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the number of workers who own shares in the business that employs them has never been higher. America leads the way: 32m Americans own stock in their companies through pension and profit-sharing plans, and share-ownership and share-option schemes. The idea continues to gain momentum. Hillary Clinton’s recent speeches suggest that she may make it an important plank in her plans to reform capitalism. And worker-capitalists are also on the march everywhere.
Conservatives like employee ownership because it gives workers a stake in the capitalist system. Left-wingers like it because it gives them a piece of the capitalist pie. And middle-of-the-roaders like it because it helps to close a potentially dangerous gap between capital and labour. Britain’s David Cameron praises John Lewis, a retailer entirely owned by its staff. Bernie Sanders, America’s only socialist senator and now a candidate for the Democratic nomination, is a champion of employee share-ownership.
The trend is also being driven by a long-term shift from "defined benefit"(DB)pension plans, in which employers guarantee the retirement income of their workers, to "defined contribution"(DC)schemes, in which workers and employers put money into an investment pot, with no guarantees of how much it will eventually pay out. Including current workers and pensioners there are more than 88m DC plans in existence. A 2013 survey by Aon Hewitt, a consulting firm, found that 14% of such plans’ assets were invested in the shares of the employer in question.
A number of studies have found that workers at firms where employees have a significant stake tend to be more productive and innovative, and to have less staff turnover. Employee ownership has its drawbacks, however. One is the risk that workers have too many eggs in one basket: if their employer goes bust they can lose their pensions as well as their jobs. Just before Enron went bankrupt in 2001 the average employee held 62% of his or her 401(k)assets in Enron shares. Despite various initiatives by Congress to stop firms touting their shares to employees, similar cases are still arising.
A second problem is entrenchment. Supporters of worker ownership argue that it helps companies take a more long-term perspective. Critics argue that it can entrench bad management and undermine a company’s long-term competitiveness: underperforming bosses are much more likely to be able to stay in place, and resist hostile takeovers, if some of the company’s shares are in friendly hands. In 1994 United Airlines handed many of its workers a 55% stake, and representation on the board, in return for pay cuts. But its performance remained poor, and it filed for bankruptcy in 2002.
A third risk is entitlement. The strongest argument in favour of employee ownership is that workers will not only toil harder if they get a slice of the profits, but will make sure that their colleagues do so too. A new paper by Benjamin Dunford and others, argues that commitment can transmute into entitlement. The academics studied a sample of 409 employees at a commercial-property firm in the Midwest and found that those who invested a higher proportion of their 401(k)accounts in company stock expected better benefits than the rest, and took more discretionary leave.(However, the study did not consider whether employee ownership boosted the firm’s overall performance.)
Arguments about employee ownership can easily become too sweeping: grand claims from supporters invite vigorous rebuttals by critics. A great deal depends on how schemes are structured, and the motives for introducing them. Another recent paper, by Han Kim and Paige Ouimet, considers the sizes of ESOPs and of the firms that offer them. They find that small ESOPs(which control a stake of less than 5 % in the company in question)are far more likely to boost productivity than large ones, because firms that introduce large ESOPs are often troubled ones trying to conserve cash by substituting shares for pay, or seeking to fend off hostile takeovers by giving shares to friendly insiders. They also argue that ESOPs are much more likely to work in smaller firms than larger ones because employee-owners can more easily monitor each other and boost overall productivity.
There is plenty to be said for employee ownership. It can sharpen workers’ motivation and go some way to healing a potentially dangerous divide between the working class and the boss class. But if politicians are serious about the idea, they need to think harder about how to make it work in practice. They should pay closer attention to how schemes are designed, and look for ways to tailor regulations and tax incentives so as to encourage well-designed schemes. They also need to deal with the problem of concentrating risk in a single company’ s shares. Given that the average life expectancy of Fortune 500 companies has fallen from 75 years in the 1930s to perhaps just 15 years today, encouraging employees to invest their savings with the companies that employ them is a recipe for miserable retirements.
In what way does the author say that the gap between capitalists and workers is shrinking? What is employee ownership?
选项
答案
with more workers who own shares "in the business that employs them"/ in a sense, they become the "owners" of the business + become the capitalists who own the business / they might earn more from such shares / gain profits from the shares they own as the capitalists do / therefore the gap between the two might be "shrinking" / "profit-sharing plans" / employee ownership: many American businesses let their employees own stock/shares in a number of ways /in a sense they are considered "owners" of the business / thus the system is called "employee ownership"
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/E0SO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
AlphaZeroseemstoexpressinsight.Itplayslikenocomputereverhas,intuitivelyandbeautifully,witharomantic,attacking
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
________topopularexpectation,thisworkisinfactquiteeasy.
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
Bakedbeansarecheapestherebutourvicesarepunished—cigarettesandalcoholcostmoreinBritain.
A、Theyareconsideredasfashionableitems.B、Theykeeppeopleclosertoeachother.C、Theyaremoreconvenienttousersthanfi
A、Theyreducedtheemployees’compensations.B、Theyfrozepays.C、Theyfiredmanyworkers.D、Theynolongerofferedpensionorh
WhatdoestheBeijingOrganizingCommitteefortheOlympicGamesplantodotosolvetheproblemscausedbycarboom?
WhatdoestheBeijingOrganizingCommitteefortheOlympicGamesplantodotosolvetheproblemscausedbycarboom?
ThelatePopehadcuredhimselfofParkinson’sdisease,thusmovingastepclosertosainthood.
随机试题
A.肛提肌B.肛门外括约肌C.肛门内括约肌D.会阴深横肌E.会阴浅横肌参与构成尿生殖膈的是()
代谢抑制剂是指在化学结构上与天然代谢物类似,这些物质进入体内可以与正常代谢物拮抗,从而影响代谢的进行。()
A.亚胺培南B.庆大霉素C.氯林可霉素D.氨曲南E.氧氟沙星在神经系统疾病患者易引起惊厥的抗菌药物是
输出功率等于和小于()的移动式无线电通信设备,如陆上、海上移动通信设备以及步话机等,其电磁辐射可以免于管理。
在企业进行财产清查时,发现存货盘盈,在报批前正确的账务处理方法为()。
建国以来,我国的教育目的的表述虽然几经变换,但基本精神是一致的,总的来说有这样几个基本点()
中国班级授课制开始于()京师同文馆的正式创立。
根据下列资料,回答下列问题。截至2012年年底,全国共有社会服务机构136.7万个,比上年增长5.6%,职工总数1144.77万人,固定资产总值为6675.4亿元。2012年全国社会服务事业费支出3683.7亿元,比上年增长14.1%,占国家财政支出比重
海城市甲公司研发部门技术人员A按公司安排开发一项商业秘密,用于甲公司生产的制鞋机中,甲公司生产的制鞋机因此在华东地区长期销路很好,市场影响大,知名度很高,有时甚至缺货。海城市乙公司也生产制鞋机,由于技术相对落后,销路不好,乙公司号召员工献计献策,以打开产品
(1)Whendoeshistorybegin?Itistemptingtoreply"Inthebeginning",butlikemanyobviousanswers,thissoonturnsouttobe
最新回复
(
0
)