首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Recla
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Recla
admin
2022-07-08
75
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams.
According to Paragraph 5, why do environmental groups want the Hetch Hetchy Dam removed?
选项
A、To restore salmon and steelhead runs to the Snake River.
B、To allow access to the headwaters of the Columbia River.
C、To increase the size of Yosemite National Park.
D、To restore a valley to its original beauty.
答案
D
解析
第5段第3句提到“拆除约塞米蒂国家公园的赫奇赫奇大坝就能让美丽的河谷重现眼前”,由此可推测,正确答案为D项。让河谷恢复原本的美貌。根据第5段第2句可知使鲑鱼和硬头鳟洄游到哥伦比亚河的源头是要拆除华盛顿州斯内克河上的四座巨型水坝才能实现,故A项错误。B项“能够回到哥伦比亚河的源头”没有说明主语,说法片面。C项 “扩大约塞米蒂国家公园的规模”在文中没有被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/E7MO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Childabuseisthephysical,psychological,social,emotionalorsexualmaltreatmentofachild.Itharmsor【L1】______thesurvi
Accordingtothespeaker,whatistheproblemwithwatchingTV?
【L1】______and【L2】______affecthowpeoplevaluepersonalcontrolindecisionmaking,accordingtoanewstudyinBiologicalPsy
WelcometotheChineseConsulate-GeneralinMelbourneforthe"ChineseCultureDay"2018.SpeakingoftheChineseculture,man
WhatdoesthespeakersayabouttheartistsintheUnitedStatesduringtheGreatDepression?
Itwasduringthe21stcenturythataveragepeoplewereabletoundertaketravelforthesakeoftravel.
Whatisthebenefitofdarkchocolate?
ThePresidentiscertaintoknowtheresultofthisvoteasa(n)______forfurtherconomicdecision-making.
Westernjurieshavetraditionallyfoundeyewitnesstestimonytobethemostconvincingevidenceincriminaltrials.Seeingisbe
Aswillbeevidentbynow,thenumberanddiversityofpersonalitytheoriesareindeedremarkable.
随机试题
阐述公共选择理论关于政府失灵原因的分析。
男,33岁。反复高热1个月伴盗汗,浅表淋巴结未触及肿大,肝不大,脾肋下2指血象正常。腹部CT示:脾内见数个1.5cm×2.0cm大的占位性病变,疑诊淋巴瘤。若明确诊断应做的检查是
以下不属于温脾汤的药物是
为了使锤造冠颈缘密合采取的措施,以下哪些是正确的
传染性非典型肺炎潜伏期为
特殊儿童学校教育的模式不包括()
阅读下面材料,回答问题。李老师是一位青年教师,工作热情非常高,他对学生的要求十分严格,经常要求学生不要讲脏话;不要乱扔废纸……而这位教师讲课情急时常常“笨猪”“死脑子”不绝于耳。吸烟后,随手将烟蒂抛在课桌下面……教育后的班级怎么样呢?虽然李老师没
下列词语中没有错别字的一组是()。
PM2.5是指大气中直径小于或等于2.5微米的颗粒物,也称为可入肺颗粒。()
张某任甲企业厂长期间,代表甲企业与乙公司签订了一份合同,后张某被撤职,由王某担任厂长,乙公司要求甲企业履行合同,王某认为这是前任厂长的事,应由张某自己解决,由于王某的干预,合同未能履行,该合同不履行的责任应由()承担。
最新回复
(
0
)