首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
67
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What should the employers do to ensure expected result of RPO?
选项
A、A company should copy other companies’ RPO solution directly.
B、A company should only learn from the successful examples of RPO solution.
C、A company should learn from both the good and unfruitful outcomes of RPO and follow some principles as well.
D、A company should learn the history of RPO first.
答案
C
解析
文中第二段提到“…organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO.”和“the fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution.”即:“……打算把他们的招聘工作外包的公司需要仔细考虑和对比一下成功的早期招聘流程外包采用者的切实的结果。”和“事实上,有一些公共的元素——我们不妨叫它们原则——当按照这些原则来做的时候,可以极大地提高招聘流程外包解决方案的效率和最终结果”,A、B项与原文相悖,D项是一个迷惑选项,第二段最后一句话提到:首先需要了解RPO,但是这只是保证达到预期目标的一个条件。所以,C项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Eo7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 C该题问的是可不可以用信用卡结算,所以(A)所说的不会驾驶是不能被选为答案的。如果只听到creditcards中的credit,没有准确理解题意,很容易选(B)为答案。正确答案是与结算有关的(C)。
A、 B、 C、 D、 D答案为(D),图片上显示的是人们在看陈列在建筑物外的书籍的样子。主语是They和People,因此都能成为正确答案,所以要留意一下谓语部分。如果漏听了entering而只听到buil
Whatdoesthespeaker’scompanydo?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatdidthemayorrecentlydo?
Whattypeofbusinessdoesthespeakerworkfor?
WheredoesStevencurrentlywork?
Whatisimportantwhenrecruitingnewstaff?Howtoattractthewell-qualifiedpeople?
•YouwillhearthespeechoftheManagingDirectoroftheInternationalMonetaryFundatthepressconference.•Asyoulisten,f
TaskTwo-DifficultythataffectedthemoveForquestions18-22,matchtheextractswithdifficulties,listedA-H.For
【C1】______adoubttherearecountriesthatofferinterestingadvantagesforentrepreneurs,selfemployedandbusinessowners.
随机试题
(2008年4月)阻碍军人执行职务罪属于_______。
某女,25岁。感冒后口唇粘膜与皮肤交界处出现成簇小水疱,半透明,初时有痒感和疼痛。最有可能的原因是
我国造价工程师注册的类型有( )注册。
甲公司属于增值税一般纳税企业,以人民币作为记账本位币,采用交易发生日的即期汇率将外币金额折算为记账本位币,年末一次计算汇兑差额。2018年甲公司发生如下业务:资料一:2018年1月1日,以外币存款1000万美元购入按年付息的美元债券,面值为1000万
—Ileftmykeysintheroomyesterday.Ihadtogetin______thewindow.—It’sdangeroustodothat.
A、 B、 C、 D、 B当1个★=1个○,1个口:2个○时,每个图形中圆的个数为13、14、15、16个,选项中只有B换算后有17个圆。
国家教育部与各省、自治区、直辖市教委之间属于()。
骑士教育
Mostyoungpeopleenjoyphysicalactivities,walking,cycling,football,ormountaineering.Thesewhohaveapassion【C1】_____
A、She’sworkingallthetime.B、She’soutallthetime.C、Sheworkseveryotherday.D、Shestudiestwiceaday.A
最新回复
(
0
)