首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2011-04-11
29
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers, and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U. S. -born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
Which of the following best indicates the main idea of the passage?
选项
A、Immigration is an economic policy as well as a politic policy.
B、Immigration will raise wages for the average native-born worker.
C、Immigration helps the economy and most American workers.
D、Immigration policy should be primarily oriented around the national goals.
答案
C
解析
下列哪项最好地概括了文章的大意?该题为归纳总结题。该文章主要探讨扩大合法移民数量政策的益处,即有助于本国经济的增长和提高普通本国工人的工资。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FAYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Becausesomeresourcesmustbeallocatedatthenationallevel,wehavecreatedpolicieswhichreflecttheaggregatedattributes
Becausesomeresourcesmustbeallocatedatthenationallevel,wehavecreatedpolicieswhichreflecttheaggregatedattributes
Inthesummerof999,LeifEriksonvoyagedtoNorwayandspentthefollowingwinterwithKingOlafTryggvason.Substantiallythe
Inthesummerof999,LeifEriksonvoyagedtoNorwayandspentthefollowingwinterwithKingOlafTryggvason.Substantiallythe
Patents,saidThomasJefferson,shoulddraw"alinebetweenthethingswhichareworthtothepublictheembarrassmentofanexc
对文化遗产不感兴趣,这是目前我们社会的一个普遍现象。这些年,走宝、毁宝的事一而再、再而三地发生,见报的只是冰山的一角,没见报的更是不得了。新山书香楼“收宝”反映的是新加坡人“走宝”,另外还有毁宝事件更令人伤心,以下仅举一例:读者某君要搬家了,清理祖
牡丹以其形美色艳、品种繁多,素有“花中之王”“国色天香”的美誉,深受国人的喜爱。牡丹又以其雍容华贵、光彩照人的外形,成为富贵、吉祥的象征,因而人们常常把牡丹与繁荣、昌盛和幸福连缀在一起。千百年来,文人墨客以牡丹为题,创造出无数名句绝响,给观赏者增添了无限的
TheidealseasonforplantingthecropinthemainfieldisJuly-AugustorNovember-December.Plantingisdoneonraisedbedsof
随机试题
男性,35岁。车祸导致右髋臼粉碎骨折。查体:血压80/50mmHg,脸色苍白,右足不能背伸。此时最有可能的并发症是
Mr.Smithwasawealthyindustrialist,buthewasnotsatisfiedwithlife.Hedidnotsleepwellandhisfooddidnotagreewithh
A.输血后1~2小时内出现发热反应,寒战、高热,伴皮肤潮红,症状可自行缓解B.输入几毫升全血后即呼吸困难、喘鸣,面色潮红,腹痛、腹泻C.输入几十毫升血后,出现腰背酸痛、高热、休克、血红蛋白尿等D.输血后出现头部剧烈胀痛,呼吸困难,发绀,大量血性泡沫痰
某民营企业的老板杨先生,现年40岁,年收入约30万元,但不稳定。杨太太,现年38岁,某中学的特级教师,年收入在4万元左右,收入稳定,参加了社会保险。女儿杨扬今年13岁。杨先生的父亲与杨先生一家同住,现年70岁,无任何收入来源。根据以上材料回答问题。杨
根据研究者对访谈结构的控制程度,可分为()。
______是指人们对于某种行为要求的依据或必要性缺乏认识与体验,跟随他人行动的现象。
根据以下情境材料,回答下列问题。某日中午,你和朋友在饭店共进午餐,饭店内突然发生枪击。请结合下列示意图回答问题:发生上图所示情况时,最容易发生的是()。
下列选项中作为法定合同担保方式的是()。
感人心者,莫先乎情,无论是血浓于水的亲情,不计得失的友情,还是海枯石烂永不变心的爱情,只要是出自内心深处的真情、挚情,都能拨动人们的心弦,奏出荡气回肠、感人肺腑的乐章!这段文字主要想说明的是()。
教师要求学生列举砖的用途,某学生在单位时间内列举出很多例证,但都在建筑材料范围之内。这表明该学生的发散思维在流畅性和变通性方面的特点是()。(2014年)
最新回复
(
0
)