首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
60
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments? ______
选项
A、They are indifferent.
B、They are worried very much.
C、They may exercise prudent avoidance.
D、They are shocked.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
TheaffluentmiddleclasscreatedbytheAsianboomnowtakeupoverfromexportsasthemainengineofgrowth.
Theprisoner______thathehadassaultedapoliceman.
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Itisreportedthatalmost66%ofthelandinthewesternpartofthecountryaredevoidofcultivation.
Mostyoungpeopletodayare,intheeyesoftheoldergeneration,selfishalmostinallrespects.
Notallsoundsmadebyanimalsserveaslanguages,andwehaveonlytoturntothediscoveryofecho-locationinbatstoseeac
Inthe1400s,artistsoftencreatedtheirownpigmentsbypulverizingsemipreciousstones.
随机试题
A.1日B.3日C.1周D.2周E.6周扣年女性急性肾盂肾炎抗生素治疗的疗程一般为
自身力量不足,需要外力协助,尤其在启动时需要帮助的骨折患者,应采取的功能锻炼方法为()
因债务人无偿转移财产,对债权人造成损害,债权人可行使的撤销权是指()。
当期货交易所总经理因故临时不能履行职权时,由()代其履行职权。[2015年5月真题]
股份有限公司公开发行公司债券对公司净资产的要求是()。
甲企业在计算2006年度企业所得税应纳税所得额时,对“存货跌价准备”在税前进行了扣除。但乙税务机关认为,甲企业100万元的“存货跌价准备”不得在税前扣除,并作出了补缴企业所得税33万元的决定。甲企业不服,拒绝补缴税款,向丙税务机关申请税务行政复议,丙税务机
某发明专利申请于2015年11月20日获得公告授权,专利权人为甲。针对该专利权,乙于2016年5月20日向专利复审委员会提出无效宣告请求,甲随后删除了部分权利要求。专利复审委员会于2016年11月20日作出审查决定,宣告修改后的权利要求维持有效。2017年
以下投资业绩评估指标中,用以测算每单位非系统风险所带来的非常规收益的是()。
Java线程组把一个线程看做一个【】进行同一处理。
Alatesurgeinuniversityapplicationsisputtingextrapressureonsixth-formerstoachievetopgradesintheirexams.F
最新回复
(
0
)