首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
2.5K+
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments? ______
选项
A、They are indifferent.
B、They are worried very much.
C、They may exercise prudent avoidance.
D、They are shocked.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Wearenotconsciousoftheextentofwhichworkprovidesthepsychologicalsatisfactionthatcanmakethedifferencebetweena
Earthobservationsshouldprovide"valueadded"applicationsfromexistingenvironmentalservices,propertytitleholdersandpr
Professionalsinvolvinginsuchdevelopmentshouldhaveauniquesenseofinnovation,theabilitytoassimilatenewinformation,
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherattemptresolvingmajordifferencesamongcountrie
Theprisoner______thathehadassaultedapoliceman.
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
It’sasurethingthatifsheknowsthatthereisa______saleintown,shewillcertainlyrushtothescene.
Heobviouslystandsagoodchanceofgettingthepost,asheiswell______themoreinfluentialmembersofthecommittee.
TheaffluentmiddleclasscreatedbytheAsianboomnowtakeupoverfromexportsasthemainengineofgrowth.
Inthe1400s,artistsoftencreatedtheirownpigmentsbypulverizingsemipreciousstones.
随机试题
基本社会化
A.柔软,疼痛,无粘连B.生长较快,质地硬,与周围组织粘连,活动度差C.容易缩小,消失D.质地较硬,易粘连,可出现波动感,破溃后形成瘘管,最终遗留瘢痕E.柔软,可出现波动感,但很快白行消退肿瘤性淋巴结肿大表现为
该患儿不会发生的并发症是:该患儿的治疗及护理正确的是:
提出城市设计是按“三维空间的要求考虑建筑及空间”的是()。
当相关系数不同时,组合的标准差也会发生变化,假设其他条件不变,下列说法正确的有()。
某商场采用毛利率法计算期末存货成本。甲类商品2018年4月1日期初成本为3500万元,当月购货成本为500万元,当月销售收入为4500万元。甲类商品第一季度实际毛利率为25%。2018年4月30日,甲类商品结存成本为()万元。
旅行社组织旅游者旅游,应与旅游者签订合同。该合同应对()作出明确约定。
设∫’(0)=2,则=().
A、Theshorterhourstheywork,thehigherpaytheycanenjoy.B、Themoretheywork,thelessleisuretheycanenjoy.C、Theshort
Childrenhavebeensaidtohavebrain-injuredchildsyndrome,hyperactive(极度活跃的)childsyndromeandattention-deficitdisorder
最新回复
(
0
)