首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
55
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
proposal
解析
名词。本题考查重点单词的反复出现。本题讨论的话题就是这个proposal,篇首便谈到该词,此处该单词反复出现,以示强调。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
IfWesternpeoplethinktheyarehealthyeaters,theywillhavetothinkagain.
SomepeopleaccusemeofbeingrudebecauseIalwaysintroducemyselftootherpeopleImeetontrains;butlanswerbytelling
Alibaba,China’secommercegroup,hascontinuedastringofdealsthatisdesignedtostrengthenitsappealaheadofanexpected
TheWorld’sHeaviestDrinkingCountriesPeopleintheUKareamongthemostprolificdrinkersintheworld,accordingtoar
Sincethereisnoevidencethathumancancer,asgenerallyexperienced,isinfectious,manypeoplebelievethatbecauseviruses
Therearealsopeoplewhoobjecttofairytalesonthegroundsthattheyarenotobjectivelytrue,thatgiants,witches,two-hea
AsforthepeoplewhoseeyesstillfindthegreatreasonsbehindthetechnologyofdualSIMphonevague,youcanfindfivereaso
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
随机试题
软件系统是相对硬件系统而言的,它包括计算机运行所需要的各种程序和相关资料。()
某一物种的个体样方数占全部样方数的百分比,这属于群落数量特征中的()
对“脏腑辨证”的认识,不正确的是
A、青霉素B、诺氟沙星C、链霉素D、四环素E、拉氧头孢对第8对脑神经有损害的药物为( )。
甲曾向乙借款9000元,后不想归还借款,便预谋毒死乙。甲将注射了“毒鼠强"的白条鸡挂在乙家门上,乙怀疑白条鸡有毒未食用。随后,甲又乘去乙家串门之机,将“毒鼠强”投放到乙家米袋内。后乙和其妻子、女儿喝过米汤中毒,乙死亡,其他人经抢救脱险。关于甲的行为,下列哪
A、 B、 C、 D、 C看每组图形中圆形所在位置的变化,第一个图形中圆形在上部,第二个图形中圆形在内部,第三个图形中圆形在外部。且每组的3个图形的组成元素是一样的,所以选C项。
不属于第三次科技革命新特点的选项是()。
验证工作记忆是否存在中央执行系统,通常使用的研究范式是()。(2010年)
n维列向量组α1,…,αn—1线性无关,且与非零向量β正交.证明:α1,…,αn—1,β线性无关.
下面程序段的运行结果是 #include<iostream.h> voidmain() {char*s="abcde"; S+=2; cout<<&s;}
最新回复
(
0
)