首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective res
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective res
admin
2016-01-05
46
问题
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences. Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public(including other scientists)receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’ s discovery claim into the community’ s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought." But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim—a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’ s reasoning and each other’ s conceptions of reason."
According to the first paragraph, the process of discovery is characterized by its
选项
A、uncertainty and complexity.
B、misconception and deceptiveness.
C、logicality and objectivity.
D、systematicness and regularity.
答案
A
解析
细节题。根据题干定位在第一段。第二句But in the everyday practice of science,discoveryfrequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.即在日常的科学实践中,科学发现常常遵循一条模糊而复杂的路径。A项uncertainty and complexity(不确定性和复杂性)是对原文ambigu—ous and complicated的同义替换,是正确答案。B项“误解和欺骗”、C项“逻辑性和客观性”都是对原文的曲解。D项“系统性和规律性”原文未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HjsZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Itisonlynaturalforleaderstotrytomakethemostoftheirstrengths.Thetheoryofcomparativeadvantagedirectspeople,a
OneofthemostpressingchallengesthattheUnitedStates—andindeed,theworld—willfaceinthenextfewdecadesishowtoall
IntheUnitedStatesthescienceofclimatechangestillremainsacontroversialissue.Partoftheproblemisthatitiscomple
IntheUnitedStatesthescienceofclimatechangestillremainsacontroversialissue.Partoftheproblemisthatitiscomple
Peopletendtoamasspossessions.Indeedtheycanhaveadelightfulsurprisewhentheyfindsomethingusefulwhichtheydidnot
[A]Dataanalysis[B]Subscribersusingtechnology[C]Accesstoreadingdata:Usingtechnology[D]OperationofScribdandOyster[
YouhavejustcomebackfromCanadaandfoundamusicCDinyourluggagethatyouforgottoreturntoBob,yourlandlordthere.
Parentsandgrandparentswithmoneytosparearenolongerwaitinguntildeathtopassontheirwealth.Instead,they’reincreas
"Ah,yes,divorce",RobinWilliamsoncemused,"fromtheLatinwordmeaningtoripoutaman’sgenitalsthroughhiswallet".The
"Ah,yes,divorce",RobinWilliamsoncemused,"fromtheLatinwordmeaningtoripoutaman’sgenitalsthroughhiswallet".The
随机试题
差动连接的单活塞杆液压缸在不增加液压泵流量的前提下就能实现快速运动。()
改正下列音节拼写的错误(不计声调):应yng___________无w___________闻wuen___________翁wueng___________
接控制是通过提高主管人员的素质来进行控制工作的。()
心室扑动的频率()
葡萄胎清宫术前准备物品中哪项不需要
年度终了,“利润分配”科目下的明细科目均应当没有余额。()
给定资料2014年4月初,37岁的H大学外文系讲师方老师开始了三年一次的述职工作。答辩结束后,系内决定继续聘任。但外文系将材料上报至校人事处进行最终核定后,方老师因学校“就职9年未评职称的老师必须离职”的规定,面临“非升即走”。
求微分方程y"+y’一2y=(2x+1)ex一2的通解.
R1、R2是一个自治系统中采用RIP路由协议的两个相邻路由器,R1的路由表如下图(a)所示,当R1收到R2发送的如下图(b)的(V,D)报文后,R1更新的五个路由表项中距离值从上到下依次为()。
Anarrowingofyourinterestsisimpliedinalmostanytransitionfromastudyenvironmenttomanagerialorprofessionalwork.
最新回复
(
0
)